Advertisement

Frontiers of Computer Science in China

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 45–56 | Cite as

Fuzzy c-means clustering with non local spatial information for noisy image segmentation

  • Feng ZhaoEmail author
  • Licheng Jiao
  • Hanqiang Liu
Research Article

Abstract

As an effective image segmentation method, the standard fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering algorithm is very sensitive to noise in images. Several modified FCM algorithms, using local spatial information, can overcome this problem to some degree. However, when the noise level in the image is high, these algorithms still cannot obtain satisfactory segmentation performance. In this paper, we introduce a non local spatial constraint term into the objective function of FCM and propose a fuzzy cmeans clustering algorithm with non local spatial information (FCM_NLS). FCM_NLS can deal more effectively with the image noise and preserve geometrical edges in the image. Performance evaluation experiments on synthetic and real images, especially magnetic resonance (MR) images, show that FCM_NLS is more robust than both the standard FCM and the modified FCM algorithms using local spatial information for noisy image segmentation.

Keywords

image segmentation fuzzy clustering algorithm non local spatial information magnetic resonance (MR) image 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1979, 9(1): 62–66MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baradez M O, McGuckin C P, Forraz N, Pettengellc R, Hoppe A. Robust and automated unimodal histogram thresholding and potential applications. Pattern Recognition, 2004, 37(6): 1131–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pappas T N. An adaptive clustering algorithm for image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1992, 40(4): 901–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cinque L, Foresti G, Lombardi L. A clustering fuzzy approach for image segmentation. Pattern Recognition, 2004, 37(9): 1797–1807zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen S C, Zhang D Q. Robust image segmentation using FCM with spatial constraints based on new kernel-induced distance measure. IEEE Trans System, Man, and Cybernetics. Part B: Cybernetics, 2004, 34(4): 1907–1916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caldairou B, Passat N, Habas P A, Studholme C, Rousseau F. A non-local fuzzy segmentation method: application to brain MRI. Pattern Recognition, 2010 (in press)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hojjatoleslami S A, Kittler J. Region growing: a new approach. IEEE Trans Image Processing, 1998, 7(7): 1079–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Osher S, Paragios N. Geometric Level Set Methods in Imaging, Vision, and Graphics. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2003zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bezdek J C. Pattern Recognition With Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms. New York: Plenum Press, 1981zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ahmed MN, Yamany SM, Mohamed N, Farag A A, Moriarty T. A modified fuzzy C-means algorithm for bias field estimation and segmentation of MRI data. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2002, 21(3): 193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang D Q, Chen S C. A novel kernelized fuzzy C-means algorithm with application in medical image segmentation. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 2004, 32(1): 37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Szilágyi L, Benyo Z, Szilágyi S, Adam H S. MR brain image segmentation using an enhanced fuzzy C-means algorithm. In: Proceedings of 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2003, 724–726Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cai W, Chen S, Zhang D. Fast and robust fuzzy c-means clustering algorithms incorporating local information for image segmentation. Pattern Recognition, 2007, 40(3): 825–838zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buades A, Coll B, Morel J M. A non-local algorithm for image denoising. In: Procceeding of 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2005, 60–65Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wu M, Schölkopf B. A local learning approach for clustering. In: Proceedings of 20th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2007, 1529–1536Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bezdek J C. Cluster validity with fuzzy sets. Cybernetics and Systems, 1973, 3(3): 58–73MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bezdek J C. Mathematical models for systematic and taxonomy. In: Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Numerical Taxonomy. 1975, 143–166Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Intelligent Perception and Image Understanding of Ministry of Education of China, Institute of Intelligent Information ProcessingXidian UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations