Frontiers of Literary Studies in China

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 25–47 | Cite as

A controversial poet, a forgotten dynasty: Jin dynasty poets’ reception of Bai Juyi and its historical significance

Research Article


A certain dispute that arose during the early Jin dynasty regarding Bai Juyi that seemed to be a coincidental occurrence was to some extent inevitable. On one hand, it foreshadowed the opposition that would later arise between followers of the Tang and Song stylistic schools; on the other, it represented both the Tang school poets’ disdain for the “ornamental avant-garde” poetry that was fashionable at the time as well as their own search for a new creative direction. The re-evaluation of Bai Juyi that occurred during that period, particularly the frequent comparison of Bai to Tao Yuanming, indicates that Bai Juyi’s poetry was widely accepted at the time, which itself represented not only a challenge to traditional perspectives, but also a historical landmark in Bai Juyi’s history of acceptance. Jin dynasty poets’ creative imitation of Bai Juyi’s carefree as well as his satirical poems spurred a maturation of Bai’s spirit of concern for self and reality, which later incorporated itself into the spirit of Chinese literati in general.


Jin dynasty poets Bai Juyi acceptance historical significance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. He Wen 何汶 (1984), Zhuzhuang shihua 竹庄诗话 (Thoughts on poetry from Bamboo village), Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
  2. Liu Qi 刘祁 (1983), Gui qian zhi 归潜志 (Returned home, secluded), Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
  3. Shang Yongliang 尚永亮 (1990), “Lengqiao: Liu Zongyuan shenmei qingyu he beiju shengming de jiejing” 冷峭: 柳宗元审美情趣和悲剧生命的结晶 (Cold-hearted: The crystallization of Liu Zongyuan’s aesthetic sense and tragic life), Jianghan luntan, no. 9.Google Scholar
  4. Shang Yongliang (2009a), “Lun Wang Ruoxu dui Bai Juyi de jieshou jiqi deshi” 论王若虚对白居易的接受及其得失 (On Wang Ruoxu’s acceptance of and influence taken from Bai Juyi), Shehui kexue, no. 9.Google Scholar
  5. Shang Yongliang (2009b), “Yuan Yishan yu Bai Letian de shixue guanlian jiqi jieshou beijing” 元遗山与白乐天的诗学关联及其接受背景 (The connections between Yuan Lost Mountain and Bai Juyi’s poetic aesthetics, and the acceptance background thereof), Wenxue yichan, no. 4.Google Scholar
  6. Shang Yongliang (2010), “’Bai Su’ lun zhi liang Song liubian jiqi shenceng yuanyin” “白俗”论之两宋流变及其深层原因 (Changes in the “vulgar bai” argument during the Song and their fundamental causes), Xueshu yanjiu, no. 5.Google Scholar
  7. Weng Fanggang 翁方纲 (1983), Shizhou shihua 石洲诗话 (Thoughts on poetry from the riverbank), Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe.Google Scholar
  8. Yong Rong 瑢永, et al. (1965), “Zhuoxuanji tiyao” «拙轩集»提要 (Abstract of Zhuoxuanji), in Siku quanshu zongmu 四库全书总目 (Encyclopedia table of contents), Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
  9. Yuan Haowen 元好问 (1959), Zhongzhou ji 中州集 (Poems from the Central Plains), Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chinese Language and Literature CollegeShaanxi Normal UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations