Advertisement

The impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes after robotic liver resection

  • Iswanto SucandyEmail author
  • Abdelrahman Attili
  • Janelle Spence
  • Timothy Bordeau
  • Sharona Ross
  • Alexander Rosemurgy
Original Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

High body mass index (BMI) is associated with other multiple comorbidities such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, steatohepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and cardiopulmonary diseases, which can impact the perioperative outcomes following liver resection. We aimed to study the impact of BMI on perioperative outcomes after robotic liver resection. All the patients undergoing robotic liver resection between 2013 and 2017 were prospectively followed. The patients were divided into three groups (BMI < 25, BMI 25–35, BMI > 35 kg/m2) for illustrative purposes. Demographic and perioperative outcome data were compared. Data are presented as median (mean ± SD). Thirty-eight patients underwent robotic hepatectomy, 73% were women, age was 58 (57 ± 17.6) years, and ASA class was 3 (3 ± 0.5). Indications for surgery were neoplastic lesions in 34 patients (89%), hemangioma in two patients (6%), fibrous mass in one patient (2.5%), and focal nodular hyperplasia in one patient (2.5%). 32% of the patients underwent right or left hemihepatectomy, 21% underwent sectionectomy, 5% underwent central hepatectomy and the reminder underwent non-anatomical liver resection. Operative time was 261 (254.6 ± 94.3) min. Estimated blood loss was 175 (276 ± 294.8) ml. Length of hospital stay was 3 (5 ± 4.9) days. By regression analysis of the three BMI groups, estimated blood loss, rate of postoperative complication, rate of conversion, need for transfusion, length of ICU stay, and length of hospital stay did not have a significant relationship with BMI. A total of five patients (13%) experience complications. Four patients had complications that were nonspecific to liver resection, including acute renal injury, respiratory failure, and enterocutaneous fistula. One patient had bile leak, treated with ERCP stenting. No mortality was seen in this study. Obesity should not dissuade surgeons from utilizing minimally invasive robotic approach for liver resection. Robotic technique is a safe and feasible in patients with high BMI. The impact of BMI on outcomes is insignificant.

Keywords

Robotic surgery Hepatobiliary Obesity Outcome Liver resection 

Notes

Funding

This paper was not funded in part or in whole by any organization.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Iswanto Sucandy, MD, Abdelrahman Attili, MD, Janelle Spence, BA, Timothy Bordeau, BA, Sharona Ross, MD, Alexander Rosemurgy, MD declare that they have no conflict of interest to report with this study.

Ethical standards

All the procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this study. A copy of the written consent is available for review upon request.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams KF, Schatzkin A, Harris TB et al (2006) Overweight, obesity, and mortality in a large prospective cohort of persons 50 to 71 years old. N Engl J Med 355:763–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bianchini F, Kaaks R, Vainio H (2002) Overweight, obesity, and cancer risk. Lancet Oncol 3:565–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Key TJ, Spencer EA, Reeves GK (2010) Symposium 1: overnutrition: consequences and solutions. Obesity and cancer risk. Proc Nutr Soc 69:86–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chow WH, Dong LM, Devesa SS (2010) Epidemiology and risk factors for kidney cancer. Nat Rev Urol 7:245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klinghoffer Z, Yang B, Kapoor A, Pinthus JH (2009) Obesity and renal cell carcinoma: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms and management considerations. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 9:975–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Madboulay K, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2003) Laparoscopic colectomy in obese and nonobese patients. J Gastrointest Surg 7(4):558–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pikarsky AJ, Saida Y, Yamaguchi T et al. (2002) Is obesity a high-risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 16(5):855–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Uchida H, Iwashita Y, Saga K et al (2016 Mar) Benefit of laparoscopic liver resection in high body mass index patients. World J Gastroenterol 14(10):3015–3022 22(CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leung U, Fong Y (2014) Robotic liver surgery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 3(5):288–294Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ho C-M, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H, Ito N, Hasegawa Y, Takahara T (2013) Systematic review of robotic liver resection. Surg Endosc 27(3):732–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baek S-J, Lee D-W, Park S-S, Kim S-H (2011) Current status of robot-assisted gastric surgery. World J Gastrointest Oncol 3(10):137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reddy SK, Tsung A, Geller DA (2011) Laparoscopic liver resection. World J Surg 35:1478–1486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mitko J, Main W et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic cholecystectomy in the obese population: is there a preferred approach ? Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(7):S114–S115Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Larson SC, Wolk A (2007) Overweight, obesity and risk of liver cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Br J Cancer 97(7):1005–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Caldwell SH, Crespo DM, Kang HS, Al-Osaimi AM (2004) Obesity and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 127:S97–S103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aleksandrova K, Stelmach-Mardas M, Schlesinger S (2016) Obesity and liver cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res 208:177–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pasulka PS, Bistrian BR, Benotti PN et al (1986) The risks of surgery in obese patients. Ann Intern Med 104:540–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pierpont YN, Dinh TP, Salas RE et al (2014) Obesity and surgical wound healing: a current review. ISRN Obes 20:638936Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bernardini MQ, Gien LT, Tipping H et al (2012) Surgical outcome of robotic surgery in morbidly obese patient with endometrial cancer compared to laparotomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 22:76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dindo D, Muller MK, Weber M, Clavien PA (2003) Obesity in general elective surgery. Lancet 361:2032–2035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kitahara H, Patel B, McCrorey M, Nisivaco S, Balkhy HH (2017) Morbid obesity does not increase morbidity or mortality in robotic cardiac surgery. Innovations (Phila) 12(6):434–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mathur AK, Ghaferi AA, Osborne NH et al (2010) Body mass index and adverse perioperative outcomes following hepatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1285–1291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nomi T, Fuks D, Ferraz JM et al (2015) Influence of body mass index on postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Endosc 29(12):3647–3654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Utsunomiya T, Okamoto M, Kameyama T et al (2008) Impact of obesity on the surgical outcome following repeat hepatic resection in Japanese patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 14:1553–1558CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iswanto Sucandy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Abdelrahman Attili
    • 1
  • Janelle Spence
    • 1
  • Timothy Bordeau
    • 1
  • Sharona Ross
    • 1
  • Alexander Rosemurgy
    • 1
  1. 1.Southeastern Center for Digestive Disorder and Hepatopancreatobiliary Cancer, Advanced Minimally Invasive and Robotic SurgeryFlorida Hospital TampaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations