A randomised trial to compare the increase in intracranial pressure as correlated with the optic nerve sheath diameter during propofol versus sevoflurane-maintained anesthesia in robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic surgery
Robot-assisted surgery can cause raised intracranial pressures (ICP) due to steep trendelenburg position and pneumoperitoneum. The choice of anesthetic agents can influence the ICP, which can be measured indirectly by correlating it with the sonographically measured optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). In this study, our primary aim was to compare the change from baseline of the ONSD during propofol versus sevoflurane-maintained anesthesia in patients undergoing robotic pelvic surgery. In this prospective, interventional, double-blinded study, we randomised 50 patients into two groups P and S. Subjects in group P received intravenous propofol infusion while those in group S received inhalation sevoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia. The ONSD at fixed intervals was noted as the mean of four values measured using ultrasound in both eyes by two independent anesthesiologists who were blinded to the group allocation. The patient demographics and baseline parameters were similar. The mean maximum rise in ONSD from baseline was 0.01 ± 0.01 cm in group P while it was 0.03 ± 0.01 cm in group S (p = 0.001). Percentage change from baseline in group P was 3.41 ± 1.81% and 8.00 ± 2.95% in group S (p = 0.001). We found a positive correlation between the duration of surgery and the maximum rise in ONSD in group S (p = 0.003), but not in group P. Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is more effective than inhalation sevoflurane in attenuating the increase in ICP as correlated with the ONSD during robotic pelvic surgery.
Robotic surgery Anesthesia agent Optic nerve sheath diameter Intracranial pressure
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Ms. Parul Takkar Chugh, Department of statistics, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India for help in analysis and interpretation of data.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Robba C, Cardim D, Donnelly J et al (2009) Effects of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position on intracranial pressure assessed using different non-invasive methods. BJA 117(6):783–91 (Not checked by JORS)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishikawa M, Watanabe H, Kurahashi T (2017) Effects of 25 and 30-degree Trendelenburg positions on intraocular pressure changes during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Prostate 5(4):135–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubb RL, Raichle ME, Eichling JO et al (1974) The effects of changes in PaCO2 on cerebral blood volume, blood flow, and vascular mean transit time. Stroke 5:630–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlunzen L, Juul N, Hansen KV et al (2012) Regional cerebral blood flow and glucose metabolism during propofol anaesthesia in healthy subjects studied with positron emission tomography. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 56:248–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelhard K, Werner C (2006) Inhalational or intravenous anesthetics for craniotomies? Pro inhalational. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 19:504–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chui JH, Mariappan R, Mehta J et al (2014) Comparison of propofol and volatile agents for maintenance of anesthesia during elective craniotomy procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 61(4):347–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J et al (2007) Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. Intracranial pressure thresholds. J Neurotrauma 24(Suppl 1):55–58 (Not validated by JORS)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajajee V, Vanaman M, Fletcher JJ et al (2011) Optic nerve ultrasound for the detection of raised intracranial pressure. Neurocrit Care 15:506–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton DR, Sargsyan AE, Melton SL et al (2011) Sonography for determining the optic nerve sheath diameter with increasing intracranial pressure in a porcine model. J Ultrasound Med 30:651–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strebel S, Lam AM, Matta B et al (1995) Dynamic and static cerebral autoregulation during isoflurane, desflurane, and propofol anesthesia. Anesthesiology 83(1):66–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen KD, Landsfeldt U, George EC et al (2003) Intracranial pressure and cerebral hemodynamic in patients with cerebral tumors: a randomized prospective study of patients subjected to craniotomy in propofol-fentanyl, isoflurane-fentanyl, or sevoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia. Anesthesiology 98:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinaud M, Lelausque JN, Chetanneau A et al (1990) Effects of propofol on cerebral hemodynamics and metabolism in patients with brain trauma. Anesthesiology 73(3):404–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond JC, Todd MM, Scheller MS et al (1986) A comparison of the direct cerebral vasodilating potencies of halothane and isoflurane in the New Zealand white rabbit. Anesthesiology 65:462–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matta BF, Heath KJ, Tipping K et al (1999) Direct cerebral vasodilatory effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane. Anesthesiology 91:677–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim MS, Bai SJ, Lee JR et al (2014) Increase in intracranial pressure during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum with steep trendelenburg positioning proven by ultrasonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter. J Endourol 28(7):801–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayal VS, Neulander M, Norton HJ et al (2007) Emergency department sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter to detect findings of increased intracranial pressure in adult head injury patients. Ann Emerg Med 49:508–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballantyne SA, O’Neill G, Hamilton R et al (2002) Observer variation in the sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter in normal adults. Eur J Ultrasound 15:145–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar