Advertisement

Performance of da Vinci Stapler during robotic-assisted right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis

  • Craig S. Johnson
  • Andrew Kassir
  • Daryl S. Marx
  • Mark K. Soliman
Original Article

Abstract

Applications for surgical staplers continue to grow, due to the increase in minimally invasive surgical approaches, and range from vessel ligation to tissue transection and anastomoses. Complications associated with stapled tissue, such as bleeding or leaks, continue to be a concern for surgeons, as both can be associated with prolonged operative times and can contribute to postoperative morbidity and mortality. The goal of this retrospective study was to evaluate the performance of the da Vinci® Xi EndoWrist® Stapler 45 with SmartClamp™ technology during robotic-assisted right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. We reviewed 113 consecutive cases from four medical centers. Preclinical diagnoses were inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (n = 5), benign bowel disease (n = 77), and malignant bowel disease (n = 31). No anastomotic leaks occurred; one event of anastomotic bleeding (0.88%) resolved without surgical intervention. Overall, there were 643 clamp attempts (5.7 attempts per case), and 570 fires (5.0 fires per case). SmartClamp™ occurrences happened in approximately one out of three cases, with the highest proportion of occurrences in the IBD group (2.0 occurrences per case). The most commonly fired reload was blue (1.5 mm closed height) with 4.1 blue reloads fired per case overall. No incomplete fires occurred during the procedures. The study data demonstrate the performance of the da Vinci Xi EndoWrist® Stapler 45 as used in right colon resection with intracorporeal anastomosis. The collection and analysis of these data provide surgeons with information related to stapler firings, which were not previously available; as such, this analysis may lead to deductions that are useful for intraoperative decision-making and clinical outcomes.

Keywords

Colectomy Intracorporeal anastomosis Colorectal disease Bowel disease Stapler Robotic assisted 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate clinical research funding from Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (Sunnyvale, CA USA) for study data collection and for the editorial support. The authors had full control over the interpretation of the data analysis and over the manuscript drafts and revisions, and all authors approved the final manuscript submission.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Dr. Johnson receives consulting and education fees from Intuitive Surgical; Dr. Marx receives fees from Intuitive for education and case observation research; and Dr. Soliman is a consultant and lecturer for Intuitive and is on the medical advisory board for C-SATS. Dr. Kassir reports no conflicts of interest or disclosures.

Ethics approval

All procedures, which were carried out and described in this study, were in accordance with the ethical standards of each institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Due to the retrospective nature of this study, formal consent was not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Chekan E, Whelan RL (2014) Surgical stapling device-tissue interactions: what surgeons need to know to improve patient outcomes. Med Devices (Auckl) 7:305–318Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown SR, Matthew R, Keding A, Marshall HC, Brown JM, Jayne DG (2014) The impact of postoperative complications on long-term quality of life after curative colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 259:916–923CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Collopy BT (2001) Colorectal anastomatic leak rates are measures of technical skill in surgery. ANZ J Surg 71:508–510CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bakker IS, Grossman I, Henneman D, Havenga K, Wiggers T (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and leak-related mortality after colonic surgery in a nationwide audit. Br J Surg 101:424–432CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim JS, Cho SY, Min BS, Kim NK (2009) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis with a doubling stapling technique. J Am Coll Surg 209(6):694–701CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holzmacher JL, Luka S, Aziz M, Amdur RL, Agarwal S, Obias V (2017) The use of robotic and laparoscopic stapling devices during minimally invasive colon and rectal surgery: a comparison. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27(2):151–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryOklahoma Surgical HospitalTulsaUSA
  2. 2.Colon and Rectal Clinic of ScottsdaleScottsdaleUSA
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryMonroe Surgical HospitalMonroeUSA
  4. 4.Colon and Rectal Clinic of OrlandoOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations