Patient satisfaction with robotic surgery
- 340 Downloads
This study is a service evaluation of the robotic-assisted surgery service within the Gynaecology Oncology department at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals. The aim is not only to evaluate and improve this new service within the department, but also to add to the available literature that reviews patient satisfaction with robotic-assisted surgery. An anonymous questionnaire was developed with questions taken from the NHS User Experience Survey Question Bank and additional questions in the same format specific to robotic-assisted surgery. This was posted to the first 140 patients to have undergone robotic-assisted surgery within Gynae Oncology at STH. One hundred completed questionnaires were returned. Over 90% of patients were pleased with the care that they received pre-operatively and felt that they have enough input into the decisions made about treatment. Half of patients (51%) reported having pain post-procedure, with a quarter of these patients experiencing severe pain. The majority of patients (72%) felt that their length of stay in hospital was of the right duration. Almost all patients (99%) were pleased with the overall care that they received and 91% would recommend robotic-assisted surgery as a modality. Patients are very satisfied with the care that they receive when undergoing robotic-assisted surgery within Gynae Oncology at our center and the majority of patients would recommend robotic-assisted surgery as a modality.
KeywordsPatient satisfaction Robotic surgery Gynaecology oncology
There was no funding for this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Both authors E. Long and F. Kew declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 5.Backes FJ, ElNaggar AC, Farrell MR, Brudie LA, Ahmad S, Salani R, Cohn DE, Holloway RW, Fowler JM, O’Malley DM (2016) Perioperative outcomes for laparotomy compared to robotic surgical staging of endometrial cancer in the elderly: a retrospective cohort. Int J Gynaecol Cancer 26:1717–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Department of Health, UK (2012) Greater voice for patients—the health and social care bill. Factsheet B3Google Scholar
- 10.Department of Health (2010) Equity and excellence: liberating the NHS (Coalition Government White Paper). s.l.: Department of HealthGoogle Scholar
- 11.Department of Health (2008) High quality care for all—NHS next stage review final report. s.l.: Department of HealthGoogle Scholar
- 12.Department of Health (2014) NHS outcomes framework 2015/16. s.l.: Department of HealthGoogle Scholar
- 13.Mulley A, Trimble C, Elwyn G (2012) Patients’ preferences matter. s.l.: The King’s FundGoogle Scholar
- 14.NHS. Question-bank. (Online). http://content.digital.nhs.uk/media/9556/Question-bank/xls/Question_Bank_-_National_and_Extended_UESv4.xlsx
- 15.Quality-Health, NHS England (2014) National Cancer Patient Experience Survey. s.l.: NHS EnglandGoogle Scholar
- 18.Ho C, Tsakonas E, Tran K et al (2011) Robot-assisted surgery compared with open surgery and laparoscopic surgery: clinical effectiveness and economic analyses. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in HealthGoogle Scholar