Advertisement

Journal of Robotic Surgery

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 727–730 | Cite as

Robotic treatment of a type 2 calyceal diverticulum in a child: is suture closure and marsupialisation enough for a good outcome?

  • V. SripathiEmail author
  • Aparajita Mitra
  • Rajiv L. Padankatti
  • T. Ganesan
Case Report

Abstract

Calyceal diverticula in children are rare and 20% eventually become symptomatic. Following the use of laparoscopic or endoscopic treatments, 85% of children report symptomatic relief. However, complete radiological resolution is seen only in three-fourths of the laparoscopic group and a quarter of those treated via endoscopy. Diathermy ablation of the lining and/or prolonged double J stenting has not altered this outcome. The robotic approach is superior to the other two techniques as the leak can be clearly identified and securely suture ligated. We believe that this is the third published report of the successful closure of a calyceal diverticulum in a child using robotic assistance. A ten-year-old boy presented with severe pain in the right flank and a palpable renal swelling. Retrograde injection of contrast outlined a large exophytic calyceal diverticulum (type 2) in the lower pole. Robotic assistance allowed precise suture closure of the neck as well as partial marsupialisation of the diverticulum. The child was discharged within 48 h and remains symptom free 18 months later. Calyceal diverticula are rare but technically challenging entities. We have shown a good outcome with only suture closure of the leak. Diathermy ablation of the lining and prolonged internal stenting were avoided.

Keywords

Pediatric calyceal diverticulum Robotic surgery Marsupialisation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Sripathi V, Mitra A, Padankatti RL and Ganesan T declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case Report/any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 130913 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Torricelli FCM, Batista LT, Colombo JR et al (2014) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic management of a caliceal diverticular calculus. BMJ Case Rep. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2014-205437 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Waingankar N, Hayek S, Smith AD et al (2014) Calyceal diverticula: a comprehensive review. Rev Urol 16(1):29–43PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Driscoll KE, Kim C (2007) A novel approach to the treatment of a calyceal diverticulum. J Robot Surg 1(3):203–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rayer P, Rayer PP (1841) Traitements des maladies des reins 3. Baillere, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wulfsohn M, Wulfsohn MA (1980) Pyelocaliceal diverticula. J Urol 123:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Narath P, Narath PA (1951) Renal pelvis and ureter. Grune and Stratton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dretler S, Dretler SP (1992) A new useful endourologic classification of calyceal diverticula. J Endourol 6(suppl):81Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miller SD, Ng CS, Streem SB, Gill IS (1992) Laparoscopic management of caliceal diverticular calculi. J Urol 167(3):1248–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Basiri A, Radfar MH, Lashay A (2013) Laparoscopic management of caliceal diverticulum: our experience, literature review, and pooling analysis. J Endourol Endourol Soc 27(5):583–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Akca O, Zargar H, Autorino R et al (2014) Robotic partial nephrectomy for caliceal diverticulum: a single-center case series. J Endourol Endourol Soc 28(8):958–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Sripathi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aparajita Mitra
    • 1
  • Rajiv L. Padankatti
    • 2
  • T. Ganesan
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric UrologyApollo Children’s HospitalChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Pediatric SurgeryApollo Children’s HospitalChennaiIndia
  3. 3.Department of UrologyApollo HospitalsChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations