Advertisement

Journal of Robotic Surgery

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 307–313 | Cite as

Efficacy and cost of robotic hepatectomy: is the robot cost-prohibitive?

  • Jonathan G. Sham
  • Morgan K. Richards
  • Y. David Seo
  • Venu G. Pillarisetty
  • Raymond S. Yeung
  • James O. Park
Original Article

Abstract

Robotic technology is being utilized in multiple hepatobiliary procedures, including hepatic resections. The benefits of minimally invasive surgical approaches have been well documented; however, there is some concern that robotic liver surgery may be prohibitively costly and therefore should be limited on this basis. A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was performed of robotic and open liver resections performed for benign and malignant pathologies. Clinical and cost outcomes were analyzed using adjusted generalized linear regression models. Clinical and cost data for 71 robotic (RH) and 88 open (OH) hepatectomies were analyzed. Operative time was significantly longer in the RH group (303 vs. 253 min; p = 0.004). Length of stay was more than 2 days shorter in the RH group (4.2 vs. 6.5 days; p < 0.001). RH perioperative costs were higher ($6026 vs. $5479; p = 0.047); however, postoperative costs were significantly lower, resulting in lower total hospital direct costs compared with OH controls ($14,754 vs. $18,998; p = 0.001). Robotic assistance is safe and effective while performing major and minor liver resections. Despite increased perioperative costs, overall RH direct costs are not greater than OH, the current standard of care.

Keywords

Robotic surgery Hepatectomy Surgical costs 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not obtained from individual participants included in the study as allowed by our institutional review board in the setting of retrospective reviews/de-identified clinical data.

References

  1. 1.
    Jacobs EF, Boris R, Masterson TA (2013) Advances in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy over time. Prostate Cancer 2013:902686CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2007) Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17(1):1–4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heemskerk J, de Hoog DE, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2007) Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 50(11):1825–1830CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wright JD, Kostolias A, Ananth CV, Burke WM, Tergas AI, Prendergast E et al (2014) Comparative effectiveness of robotically assisted compared with laparoscopic adnexal surgery for benign gynecologic disease. Obstet Gynecol 124(5):886–896CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI et al (2013) Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA 309(7):689–698CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Polignano FM, Quyn AJ, de Figueiredo RS, Henderson NA, Kulli C, Tait IS (2008) Laparoscopic versus open liver segmentectomy: prospective, case-matched, intention-to-treat analysis of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness. Surg Endosc 22(12):2564–2570CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dagher I, Di Giuro G, Dubrez J, Lainas P, Smadja C, Franco D (2009) Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy: a comparative study. Am J Surg 198(2):173–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, Lykoudis P, Primrose JN, Pearce NW (2011) Single-centre comparative study of laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 15(5):818–823CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250(5):831–841CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261(4):619–629PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D (2009) The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg 250(5):772–782CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kluger MD, Vigano L, Barroso R, Cherqui D (2013) The learning curve in laparoscopic major liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20(2):131–136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cai X, Li Z, Zhang Y, Yu H, Liang X, Jin R et al (2014) Laparoscopic liver resection and the learning curve: a 14-year, single-center experience. Surg Endosc 28(4):1334–1341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leddy L, Lendva T, Satava R (2010) Robotic surgery: applications and cost effectiveness. Open Access Surg 3:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM, Duan WD, Lu F, Dong JH (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg 253(2):342–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Idrees K, Bartlett DL (2010) Robotic liver surgery. Surg Clin N Am 90(4):761–774CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Coratti A, Bianco FM, Addeo P, Buchs NC et al (2011) Totally robotic right hepatectomy: surgical technique and outcomes. Arch Surg 146(7):844–850CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Buchs NC et al (2011) Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. Surgery 149(1):29–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Park BJ, Flores RM (2008) Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 18(3):297–300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morgan JA, Thornton BA, Peacock JC, Hollingsworth KW, Smith CR, Oz MC et al (2005) Does robotic technology make minimally invasive cardiac surgery too expensive? A hospital cost analysis of robotic and conventional techniques. J Cardiac Surg 20(3):246–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Martin AD, Nunez RN, Castle EP (2011) Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy: a complete cost analysis. Urology 77(3):621–625CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hohwu L, Borre M, Ehlers L, Venborg Pedersen K (2011) A short-term cost-effectiveness study comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Med Econ 14(4):403–409CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kaye DR, Mullins JK, Carter HB, Bivalacqua TJ (2015) Robotic surgery in urological oncology: patient care or market share? Nat Rev Urol 12:55–60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Castaing D, Vibert E, Ricca L, Azoulay D, Adam R, Gayet B (2009) Oncologic results of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases in two specialized centers. Ann Surg 250(5):849–855CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    CDC (2015) Defining adult overweight and obesity. http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/defining.html (cited 20 Sept 2015)
  28. 28.
    Dripps RD (1963) New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 24:111Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Herron DM, Marohn M, Group S-MRSC (2008) A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 22(2):313–325 (discussion 1–2) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yu YD, Kim KH, Jung DH, Namkoong JM, Yoon SY, Jung SW et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study from a single center. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 399(8):1039–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, Sabbaghian S, Tohme S, Steel J et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259(3):549–555CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tranchart H, Ceribelli C, Ferretti S, Dagher I, Patriti A (2014) Traditional versus robot-assisted full laparoscopic liver resection: a matched-pair comparative study. World J Surg 38(11):2904–2909CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Spampinato MG, Coratti A, Bianco L, Caniglia F, Laurenzi A, Puleo F et al (2014) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study. Surg Endosc 28(10):2973–2979CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cai XJ, Yang J, Yu H, Liang X, Wang YF, Zhu ZY et al (2008) Clinical study of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors. Surg Endosc 22(11):2350–2356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ocuin LM, Tsung A (2015) Robotic liver resection for malignancy: current status, oncologic outcomes, comparison to laparoscopy, and future applications. J Surg Oncol 112(3):295–301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Barbash GI, Glied SA (2010) New technology and health care costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 363(8):701–704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan G. Sham
    • 1
  • Morgan K. Richards
    • 1
  • Y. David Seo
    • 1
  • Venu G. Pillarisetty
    • 1
  • Raymond S. Yeung
    • 1
  • James O. Park
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Center for Advanced Minimally Invasive Liver Oncologic Therapies (CAMILOT)University of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations