Journal of Robotic Surgery

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 79–82 | Cite as

Are there advantages to robotic-assisted surgery over laparoscopy from the surgeon’s perspective?

  • Julie Ann Van Koughnett
  • Shiva Jayaraman
  • Roy Eagleson
  • Douglas Quan
  • Aimee van Wynsberghe
  • Christopher M. Schlachta
Original Article

Abstract

The advantages of a robotic approach are often difficult to quantify for surgical procedures that can be performed laparoscopically. Using a novel subjective rating scale, this study demonstrates a methodology to measure surgeon assessment of ease of use, comparing complex operations performed robotically and laparoscopically. A subjective assessment scale for robotic surgery was developed that included 13 task-related factors assessing operative challenges and ease of use. As part of a larger study comparing outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic biliary-enteric anastomosis, a surgeon performing 20 choledochojejunal anastomoses in an ex vivo pig model completed this scale after each procedure. Ten anastomoses were performed laparoscopically and ten using da Vinci robot assistance. Overall difficulty was also assessed using a 10-cm visual analog scale. Robotic surgery was associated with superior ease to laparoscopy in 8 of the 13 factors, including image quality, depth perception, comfort, eye fatigue, dexterity, precision of motion, speed of motion, and range of motion. The visual analog scale also showed a significant benefit in overall ease of the robotic over laparoscopic procedure. Nonsignificant trends favoring robotics were seen with fluidity of motion and equipment setup. Based on these results this study suggest that surgeon ease of use may be quantified using this assessment scale and that robot assistance may be advantageous over laparoscopy when performing complex surgical tasks in an ex vivo model from the surgeon’s perspective.

Keywords

Robotic surgery Laparoscopic surgery da Vinci surgical system 

References

  1. 1.
    Advincula AP (2006) Surgical techniques: robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system. Int J Med Robot 2:305–311. doi: 10.1002/rcs.111 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Advincula AP, Song A (2007) The role of robotic surgery in gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19:331–336. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328216f90b PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matsunaga GS, Ahlering TE, Skarecky DW (2006) Update on robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Sci World J 6:2542–2552. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2006.394 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kondraske GV, Hamilton EC, Scott DJ et al (2002) Surgeon workload and motion efficiency with robot and human laparoscopic camera control. Surg Endosc 16:1523–1527. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8272-x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D et al (2005) Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 19:117–119. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9004-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Narula VK, Watson WC, Davis SS et al (2007) A computerized analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic task performance. Surg Endosc 21:2258–2261. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9363-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kraft BM, Jager C, Kraft K et al (2004) The AESOP robot system in laparoscopic surgery: increased risk or advantage for surgeon and patient? Surg Endosc 18:1216–1223. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9200-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie Ann Van Koughnett
    • 2
  • Shiva Jayaraman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Roy Eagleson
    • 1
    • 3
  • Douglas Quan
    • 2
  • Aimee van Wynsberghe
    • 1
  • Christopher M. Schlachta
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Canadian Surgical Technologies and Advanced Robotics (CSTAR)London Health Sciences Centre, Lawson Health Research InstituteLondonCanada
  2. 2.Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and DentistryUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  3. 3.Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations