Robotic-assisted surgery has been described for many general surgery procedures, including gastric bypass. This is a comparative study looking at the short-term outcomes and technical differences between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRNY) and robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RARNY). Our database was reviewed for all Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures performed over the last 5 years. Operative times, length of stay, and all complications listed for the 90 days postoperatively were recorded and statistically analyzed. A total of 356 LRNY and 249 RARNY were performed. The average body mass index (BMI), age, and sex were similar between groups. On average, the RARNY took 17 min longer than the LRNY, this difference being significant (p < 0.01). Average length of stay for the two groups was similar (~3 days). There were a total of 51 complications in the standard laparoscopic group (14%), of which 14 (3.9%) were major complications. In the robotic group, there were 35 (14%) complications, of which 9 (3.6%) were major complications. The only significant difference in complication rate was for anastomotic leak at the gastrojejunostomy: there were no leaks in the robotic series, and six (1.7%) in the standard laparoscopic series (p = 0.04). Length of stay and overall complication rates were similar for RARNY and LRNY. There was no mortality in either group, and the complication rate was lower than literature standards. While the RARNY took longer, there was a significantly lower gastrointestinal leak rate in this group.
Leak rate Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Robotic-assisted surgery Bariatric surgery
Huffmanm LC, Pandalai PK, Boulton BJ, James L, Starnes SL, Reed MF et al (2007) Robotic Heller myotomy: a safe operation with higher postoperative quality-of-life indices. Surgery 142(4):613–618. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2007.08.003. Discussion 618–620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrn JC, Schluender S, Divino CM, Conrad J, Gurland B, Shlasko E et al (2007) Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci robot system. Am J Surg 193(4):519–522. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.042PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu SC, Clapp BL, Lee MJ, Albrecht WC, Scarborough TK, Wilson EB (2006) Robotic assistance provides excellent outcomes during the learning curve for laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from 100 robotic-assisted gastric bypasses. Am J Surg 192(6):746–749. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.038PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madan AK, Harper JL, Tichansky DS (2008) Techniques of laparoscopic gastric bypass: on-line survey of American Society for Bariatric Surgery practicing surgeons. Surg Obes Relat Dis 4(2):166–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer MA, Lidor A, Magnuson TH (2006) A zero leak rate in 251 consecutive laparoscopic gastric bypass operations using a two-layer gastrojejunostomy technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16(2):83–87. doi:10.1089/lap.2006.16.83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar