Advertisement

Cliometrica

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 221–244 | Cite as

Welfare reform, 1834: Did the New Poor Law in England produce significant economic gains?

  • Gregory ClarkEmail author
  • Marianne E. Page
Original Paper

Abstract

The English Old Poor Law, which before 1834 provided welfare to the elderly, children, the improvident, and the unfortunate, was a bête noire of the new discipline of Political Economy. Smith, Bentham, Malthus, and Ricardo all claimed it created significant social costs and increased rather than reduced poverty. The Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834, drafted by Political Economists, cuts payments sharply. Because local rules on eligibility and provision varied greatly before the 1834 reform, we can estimate the social costs of the extensive welfare provision of the Old Poor Law. Surprisingly there is no evidence of any of the alleged social costs that prompted the harsh treatment of the poor after 1834. Political economy, it seems, was born in sin.

Keywords

Welfare reform Poverty Welfare systems Work incentives 

JEL Classification

J6 J13 N33 

References

Official Sources

  1. Great Britain, Parliamentary Papers (1803–1804) Returns relative to the expense and maintenance of the poor in England, vol XIIIGoogle Scholar
  2. Great Britain, Parliamentary Papers (1818) Returns relative to the expense and maintenance of the poor in England, vol XIXGoogle Scholar
  3. Great Britain, Parliamentary Papers (1830–1831) Money expended for the relief of the poor, 1825–9, vol XI, p 217Google Scholar
  4. Great Britain, Parliamentary Papers (1833) 1831 census: abstracts of the answers and returns, vols XXXVI–XXXVIIIGoogle Scholar
  5. Great Britain, Parliamentary Papers (1834a) Report of the poor law commission, vol XXVIIGoogle Scholar
  6. Great Britain, Parliamentary Papers (1834b) Report of the poor law commission, Appendix B. 1. Part II, vol XXXIGoogle Scholar
  7. Great Britain, Parliamentary Papers (1835) Money expended for the maintenance of the poor, 1830–4, vol XLVII, pp 185–400Google Scholar
  8. Great Britain, Parliamentary Papers (1844) Poor rates, vol XLGoogle Scholar
  9. Great Britain, Parliamentary Papers (1845) Annual value of real property of each parish of each county of England and wales assessed to the property and income tax, 1842–3, vol XXXVIIIGoogle Scholar

Other Sources

  1. Bentham J (2001) The collected works of Jeremy Bentham. In: Quinn M (ed) Writings on the poor laws, vol 1. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Besley T, Coate S (1992) Workfare versus welfare: incentive arguments for work requirements in poverty-alleviation programs. Am Econ Rev 82(1):249–261Google Scholar
  3. Boberg-Fazlic N, Sharp P (2017) Does welfare spending crowd out charitable activity? Evidence from historical England under the poor laws. Econ J 127:50–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boberg-Fazlic N, Sharp P (2018) North and south: long-run social mobility in England and attitudes toward welfare. Cliometrica 12(2):251–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaug M (1963) The myth of the old poor law and the making of the new. J Econ Hist 23:151–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyer GR (1989) Malthus was right after all: poor relief and birth rates in southeastern England. J Polit Econ 97(1):92–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyer GR (1990) An economic history of the english poor law, 1750–1850. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark G (1998) Commons sense: common property rights, efficiency, and institutional change. J Econ Hist 58(1):73–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark G (2001) Farm wages and living standards in the industrial revolution: England, 1670–1870. Econ Hist Rev 54(3):477–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark G (2002) Farmland rental values and agrarian history: England and wales, 1500–1912. Eur Rev Econ Hist 6(3):281–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huzel JP (1980) The demographic impact of the old poor law: more relfections on malthus. Econ Hist Rev 33:367–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. King S (2000) Poverty and welfare in England, 1700–1850: a regional perspective. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  13. Lindbeck A (1997) The Swedish experiment. J Econ Lit 35(3):1273–1319Google Scholar
  14. Lindert PH (1998) Poor relief before the welfare state: Britain versus the continent, 1780–1880. Eur Rev Econ Hist 2:101–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McCloskey D (1973) New perspectives on the old poor law. Explor Econ Hist 10:419–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Malthus TR (1970) A letter to Samuel Whitbread…on his proposed bill for the amendment of the poor laws, 2nd edn. London: Johnson, 1807. Reprinted in The Pamphlets of Thomas Robert Malthus. New York: KelleyGoogle Scholar
  17. Richards E (1993) How did poor people emigrate from the British Isles to Australia in the nineteenth century? J Br Stud 32(3):250–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ricardo D (1919) The principles of political economy and taxation. G. Bell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith A (1904) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (Cannan E ed). Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Song BK (1998) Landed interest, local government, and the labor market in England, 1750–1850. Econ Hist Rev 51:465–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Song BK (2002) Parish typology and the operation of the poor laws in early nineteenth-century. Agric Hist Rev 50(2):203–224Google Scholar
  22. Statistical Society (1843) Pauperism and poor-rates in the parochial year 1842; Abstracted from the ninth annual report of the poor law commissioners, 1843. J Stat Soc Lond 6(3):256–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tate WE, Turner ME (1978) A domesday of english enclosure acts and awards. University of ReadingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations