Advertisement

Cliometrica

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 377–406 | Cite as

The integration of economic history into economics

  • Robert A. Margo
Original Paper

Abstract

In the USA today the academic field of economic history is much closer to economics than it is to history in terms of professional behavior, a stylized fact that I call the “integration of economic history into economics.” I document this using two types of evidence—use of econometric language in articles appearing in academic journals of economic history and economics; and publication histories of successive cohorts of Ph.D.s in the first decade since receiving the doctorate. Over time, economic history became more like economics in its use of econometrics and in the likelihood of scholars publishing in economics, as opposed to, say, economic history journals. But the pace of change was slower in economic history than in labor economics, another subfield of economics that underwent profound intellectual change in the 1950s and 1960s, and there was also a structural break evident for post-2000 Ph.D. cohorts. To account for these features of the data, I sketch a simple, overlapping generations model of the academic labor market in which junior scholars have to convince senior scholars of the merits of their work in order to gain tenure. I argue that the early cliometricians—most notably, Robert Fogel and Douglass North—conceived of a scholarly identity for economic history that kept the field distinct from economics proper in various ways, until after 2000 when their influence had waned.

Keywords

Economics Economic history Integration Labor economics Econometrics Overlapping generations Scholarly identity 

JEL Classification

A14 N01 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to two anonymous referees, Ran Abramitzky, Jeremy Atack, Leah Boustan, Lee Breckenridge, William Collins, Stanley Engerman, Martin Fiszbein, Claudia Goldin, Carol Heim, Kevin Lang, David Mitch, Claudia Rei, Paul Rhode, John Wallis, Robert Whaples; and workshop participants at Harvard University and in the session on “Cliometrics in Historical Perspective: In Remembrance of Robert Fogel and Douglass North,” held at the ASSA meetings in Chicago, IL in January 2017 for helpful comments. I acknowledge the generous assistance of Michael Haupert for helping to complete my collection of CVs of economic historians; and of David Mitch, for alerting me to the existence of unpublished documents from the papers of Robert Fogel held at the University of Chicago and from the papers of Douglass North held at Duke University. This paper is dedicated to the memory of Robert Fogel and Douglass North.

References

  1. Abramitzky R (2015) Economics and the modern economic historian. J Econ Hist 75:1240–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu D, Robinson JA (2006) Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. Am Econ Rev 91:1369–1401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Diamond AM Jr (1980) Age and the acceptance of cliometrics. J Econ Hist 40:838–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diamond J, Robinson JA (eds) (2011) Natural experiments of history. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Fogel RW, Engerman SL (1971) The reinterpretation of American economic history. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Fogel RW, Engerman SL (1974) Time on the cross: the economics of American Negro slavery. Little, Brown, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Galor O, Weil D (2000) Population, technology and growth: from malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond. Am Econ Rev 90:806–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goldin C (1976) Urban slavery in the American South: a quantitative history. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldin C (1990) Understanding the gender gap: an economic history of american women. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenwood J, Seshardi A, Vandenbroucke G (2005) The baby boom and the baby bust. Am Econ Rev 95:183–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heckman JJ (1997) The value of quantitative evidence on the effect of the past on the present. Am Econ Rev Papers Proc 87:404–408Google Scholar
  13. Hilt E (2017) Economic history, historical analysis, and the ‘new history of capitalism’. J Econ Hist 77:511–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lamoreaux NR (2016) Beyond the old and new: economic history in the United States. In: Boldizzoni F, Hudson P (eds) Routledge handbook of global economic history. Routledge, New York, pp 35–54Google Scholar
  15. Margo RA (2011) The economic history of the American economic review: a century’s explosion of economics research. Am Econ Rev 101:9–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mejia J (2015) The evolution of economic history since 1950: from cliometrics to cliodynamics. Tiempo Econ 2:79–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. North D (1997) Cliometrics—40 years later. Am Econ Rev Papers Proc 87:412–414Google Scholar
  18. Olmstead AL, Rhode PW (2016) Cotton, slavery, and the new history of capitalism. Working paper, Department of Economics, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  19. Poelmans E, Rousseau S (2016) Quantifying the heterogeneity of publication cultures in economic, business, and financial history. Essays Econ Bus Hist 34:95–135Google Scholar
  20. Romer C (1986) Spurious volatility in historical unemployment data. J Polit Econ 94:1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Romer C (1994) The end of economic history? J Econ Educ 25:49–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Selzer AJ, Hamermesh DS (2017) Co-authorship in economic history and economics: are we different? Working paper, Department of Economics, Royal Holloway University of LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70:65–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Solow RM (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39:312–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stigler G (1984) Economics: the imperial science? Scand J Econ 86:301–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Whaples R (1991) A quantitative history of the journal of economic history and the cliometrics revolution. J Econ Hist 51:289–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Whaples R (2002) The supply and demand of economic history: recent trends in the Journal of Economic History. J Econ Hist 62:524–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Williamson SH, Lyons JS (2013) Interview with Robert W. Fogel. In: Lyons JS, Cain LP, Willison SH (eds) Reflections on the cliometrics revolution: conversations with economic historians. Routledge, New York, pp 332–353 (Paperback edition) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations