Stationary and transient acoustically induced birefringence of methyl acetate molecules dissolved in ethanol

  • G. Stogiannidis
  • S. Tsigoias
  • S. Kaziannis
  • A. G. KalampouniasEmail author
Original Paper


A detailed study of the acoustically induced birefringence has been performed in methyl acetate molecules in solutions with ethanol to evaluate the relative variations of the acoustic intensity. Static and dynamic birefringence signals are ascribed to the orientation of the molecules along the direction of the applied ultrasonic field. The birefringence in dilute and concentrated solutions was investigated as a function of frequency, ultrasonic intensity and concentration. The transient behavior of the birefringence is indicative of a single exponential function implying a single relaxation mechanism. Systematic analysis of the experimental results is performed in the context of the presence of two distinct types of MA molecules in the solutions, namely the molecules that are similar to those existing in bulk material and the “solution”-type molecules that are distorted after the interaction with the ethanol/solvent molecules. The estimated relatively slow relaxation times, obtained from the transient birefringence measurements, imply that the acoustically induced birefringence is affected by the collective motion over the short-to-medium range order. Relaxation times exhibit a characteristic change below and above ~ 0.6 volume fraction of MA, which is related to the presence of the two discrete types of methyl acetate molecules in the solutions.


Acoustically induced birefringence Stationary birefringence Transient birefringence Reorientational relaxation Collective motion 



The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the University of Ioannina. Furthermore, we would like to express our thanks to Professor Dr. C. Kosmidis and the personnel of the Central Laser Facility of Ioannina University for access on their facilities and their help.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. Agarwal L, Pavani V, Rao DP, Kaistha N (2010) Process intensification in HiGee absorption and distillation: design procedure and applications. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:10046–10058. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. De Gennes PG, Prost J (1993) The physics of liquid crystals. Claredron, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Fair MC, Anderson JL (1989) Electrophoresis of nonuniformly charged ellipsoidal particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 127:388–400. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fan S, Chapline M, Franklin N, Tombler T, Cassell A, Dai H (1999) Self-oriented regular arrays of carbon nanotubes and their emission field emission properties. Sience 283:512–514. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frohlich H (1949) Theory of dielectrics; dielectric constant and dielectric loss. Oxford Clarendon Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Harmsen GJ (2007) Reactive distillation: the front-runner of industrial process intensification. A full review of commercial applications, research, scale-up, design and operation. Chem Eng Proc Proc Int 46:774–780. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hilyard NC, Jerrard HG (1962) Theories of birefringence induced in liquids by ultrasonic waves. J Appl Phys 33:3470–3479. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hiwale RS, Bhate NV, Mahajani YS, Mahajani SM (2004) Industrial applications of reactive distillation: recent trends. Int J Chem React Eng 2:1–52. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hurtado-Aviles EA, Torres JA, Trejo-Valdez M, Romero-Ángeles B, Villalpando I, Torres-Torres C (2018) Amplitude-modulated acoustic waves by nonlinear optical signals in bimetallic Au-Pt nanoparticles and ethanol based nanofluids. J Mol Liq 263:288–293. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hurtado-Aviles EA, Torres JA, Trejo-Valdez M, Torres-SanMiguel CR, Villalpando I, Torres-Torres C (2019) Ultrasonic influence on plasmonic effects exhibited by photoactive bimetallic Au-Pt nanoparticles suspended in ethanol. Materials 12:1791. CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Jerrard HG (1964) Birefringence induced in liquids and solutions by ultrasonic waves. Ultrasonics 2:74–81. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kalampounias AG (2012a) Picosecond dynamics from lanthanide chloride melts. J Mol Struct 1030:125–130. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kalampounias AG (2012b) Manifestation of thermodynamic glass transition by structure and picosecond dynamics in alkali tellurite glasses. J Non-Cryst Solids 358:2796–2802. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kalampounias AG, Tsilomelekis G, Boghosian S (2015) Vibrational dephasing and frequency shifts of hydrogen-bonded pyridine–water complexes. Spectrochim Acta A 135:31–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumbharkhane AC, Puranik SM, Mehrotra SC (1993) Dielectric relaxation studies of aqueous N, N-dimethylformamide using a picosecond time domain technique. J Solut Chem 22:219–229. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li J, Ng HT, Cassell A, Fan W, Chen H, Ye Q, Koehne J, Han J, Meyyappan M (2003) Carbon nanotube nanoelectrode array for ultrasensitive DNA detection. Nano Lett 3:597–602. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li L, Liu Y, Zhang F, Sun Z (2017) Several explanations on the theoretical formula of Helmholtz resonator. Adv Eng Softw 114:361–371. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lipeles R, Kivelson D (1980) Experimental studies of acoustically induced birefringence. J Chem Phys 72:6199–6208. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Love AEH (1888) The small free vibrations and deformation of a thin elastic shell. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 179:491–546. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martinoty P, Bader M (1981) Measurement of the birefringence induced in liquids by ultrasonic waves: application to the study of the isotropic phase of PAA near the transition point. J Phys 42:1097–1102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Matsuoka T, Yasuda K, Koda S, Nomura H (1999) On the frequency dependence of ultrasonically induced birefringence in isotropic phase of liquid crystal: 5CB (p-n-pentyl p’-cyanobiphenyl). J Chem Phys 111:1580–1586. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Matsuoka T, Koda S, Nomura H (2000) Linear and nonlinear ultrasonically induced birefringence in polymer solutions. Jpn J Appl Phys 39:2902–2905. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Matsuoka T, Yasuda K, Yamamoto K, Koda S, Nomura H (2007) Dynamics of ultrasonically induced birefringence of in rod-like colloidal solutions. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 56:72–79. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mendonça CR, Neves UM, Guedes I, Zilio SC, Misoguti L (2006) Coherent control of optically induced birefringence in azoaromatic molecules. Phys Rev A 74:025401-1–025401-4. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mpourazanis P, Stogiannidis G, Tsigoias S, Kalampounias AG (2019a) Transverse phonons and intermediate-range order in Sr-Mg fluorophosphate glasses. Spectrochim Acta A 212:363–370. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mpourazanis P, Stogiannidis G, Tsigoias S, Papatheodorou GN, Kalampounias AG (2019b) Ionic to covalent glass network transition: effects on elastic and vibrational properties according to ultrasonic echography and Raman spectroscopy. J Phys Chem Solids 125:43–50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Natansohn A, Rochon P, Gosselin J, Xie S (1992) Azo polymers for reversible optical storage. 1. Poly[4′-[[2-(acryloyloxy)ethyl]ethylamino]-4-nitroazobenzene]. Macromolecules 25:2268–2273. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nomura H, Matsuoka T, Koda S (2002) Translational-orientational coupling motion of molecules in liquids and solutions. J Mol Liq 96–97:135–151. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nomura H, Matsuoka T, Koda S (2004) Ultrasonically induced birefringence in liquids and solutions. In: Samios J, Durov VA (eds) Novel approaches to the structure and dynamics of liquids: experiments, theories and simulations. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 167–192. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oka S (1939) Zur Theorie der Doppelbrechung bei nicht-kugelförmigen Kolloiden im Ultraschallfelde. Kolloid Z 87:37–43. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oka S (1940) Zur Theorie der akustischen Doppelbrechung von kolloidalen Lösungen. Z Phys 116:632–651. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ou-Yang HD, MacPhail RA, Kivelson D (1986) Nonlinear ultrasonically induced birefringence in gold sols: frequency-dependent diffusion. Phys Rev A 33:611–619. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scruby CB, Drain LE (1990) Laser ultrasonics. Adam Higler, BristolGoogle Scholar
  34. Shirke RM, Chaudhari A, More NM, Patil PB (2000) Dielectric measurements on methyl acetate + alcohol mixtures at (288, 298, 308, and 318) K using the time domain technique. J Chem Eng Data 45:917–919. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stogiannidis G, Tsigoias S, Mpourazanis P, Boghosian S, Kaziannis S, Kalampounias AG (2019) Dynamics and vibrational coupling of methyl acetate dissolved in ethanol. Chem Phys 522:1–9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yasuda K, Matsuoka T, Koda S, Nomura H (1994) Linear and nonlinear ultrasonically induced birefringence in polymer solutions. Jpn J Appl Phys 33:2901–2905. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yasuda K, Matsuoka T, Koda S, Nomura H (1996) Frequency dependence of ultrasonically induced birefringence of rodlike particles. J Phys Chem 100:5892–5897. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yasuda K, Matsuoka T, Koda S, Nomura H (1997) Dynamics of entanglement networks of rodlike micelles studied by measurements of ultrasonically induced birefringence. J Phys Chem B 101:1138–1141. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yesilkoy F, Terborg RA, Pello J, Belushkin AA, Jahani Y, Pruneri V, Altug H (2018) Phase-sensitive plasmonic biosensor using a portable and large field-of-view interferometric microarray imager. Light Sci Appl 7:17152. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang L, Deng L, Zhou Y, Liu C, Fan S (2016) Photodetection and photoswitch based on polarized optical response of macroscopically aligned carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett 16:6378–6382. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Stogiannidis
    • 1
  • S. Tsigoias
    • 1
  • S. Kaziannis
    • 2
  • A. G. Kalampounias
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of IoanninaIoanninaGreece
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversity of IoanninaIoanninaGreece
  3. 3.Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, FORTH/ICE-HTPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations