Advertisement

Tar content and composition during a low-temperature steam gasification of rice husks

  • Van Minh DuongEmail author
  • Monika Seiber
  • Hermann Hofbauer
Original Paper
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

The research work extends our recent empirical knowledge on the rice husks, a carbonaceous solid material. This solid biofuel option was characterized with a potential net heating value of 16–17 MJ/kg, significant high ash deformation temperature recorded above 1450 °C, capable and considerable for thermochemical conversion systems. An experimental performance on a dual fluidized bed steam gasifier using rice husks pellets was carried out at a low temperature between 600 and 650 °C and fuel power of 100 kWth. Pure steam was used as a gasification agent in fluidization at a steam to fuel ratio of 1.2 kg/kg on dry basis. Calcite with mainly CaCO3 in composition was used as bed material for the reactor. Tar content and composition in the product gas stream were analyzed with a gas chromatograph coupled with mass spectrometer (GC–MS). Significant high amounts of total GC–MS tar components (without benzene, ethylbenzene, and xylene) and gravimetric tar (higher molecular tar) were detected at 29.44 and 17.82 g/m3 on dry basis. Benzene content was, respectively, presented on a value of 9 g/m3 on dry basis. Obtained products consisted of relevant amount of phenol and heterocyclic aromatic tars (class 2). The specific composition of common and additional analytes presented in GS–MS tar was summarized for better understanding of tar formation and reduction phenomena of rice husk gasification.

Keywords

Solid biofuel Rice husks Steam gasification GC–MS tar 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out under the Programme Erasmus + Key Action 1 in research exchange and staff mobility between member states. An acknowledgement would be given to the European Commission for their excellent contributions. The authors would express their appreciation to the analytical groups at University of Chemistry and Technology Prague and Vienna University of Technology for their excellent technical assistances.

References

  1. Abe H, Akio K, Bhuwneshwar P (2007) Potential for rural electrification based on biomass gasification in Cambodia. Biomass Bioenerg 31(9):656–664.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.06.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aigner I, Pfeifer C, Hofbauer H (2011) Gasification of coal and wood in a dual fluidized bed gasifier. Fuel 90(7):2404–2412.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.03.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhattacharyya SC (2014) Viability of off-grid electricity supply using rice husk: a case study from South Asia. Biomass Bioenerg 68:44–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharyya SC, Narendra S, Zaman A (1984) Some aspects of fluidized bed combustion of paddy husk. Appl Energy 16(4):307–316.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-2619(84)90005-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CEN/TS 15439 (2006) Biomass gasification—tar and particles in product gases—sampling and analysis. European Committee for Standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  6. Cortazar M, Lopez G, Alvarez J, Amutio M, Bilbao J, Olazar M (2018) Advantages of confining the fountain in a conical spouted bed reactor for biomass steam gasification. Energy 153:455–463.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Devi L, Ptasinski Krzysztof J, Janssen Frans JJG (2004) Pretreated olivine as tar removal catalyst for biomass gasifiers: investigation using naphthalene as model tar. Fuel Process Technol 86:707–730.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2004.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Devi L, Craje M, Thüne P, Ptasinski Krzysztof J, Janssen Frans JJG (2005) Olivine as tar removal catalyst for biomass gasifiers: catalyst characterization. Appl Catal A 294:68–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2005.07.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fang M, Yang L, Chen G, Shi Z, Luo Z, Cen K (2004) Experimental study on rice husk combustion in a circulating fluidized bed. Fuel Process Technol 85:1273–1282.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2003.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. IPCC (2012) The IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/renewable-energy-sources-and-climate-change-mitigation/. Accessed 16 Apr 2019
  11. Kojima T, Assavadakorn P, Furusawa T (1993) Measurement and evaluation of gasification kinetics of sawdust char with steam in an experimental fluidized bed. Fuel Process Technol 36(3):201–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3820(93)90028-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Loha C, Chattophadhyay H, Chatterjee PK (2011) Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen rich synthetic gas generation from fluidized bed gasification of rice husk. Energy 36:4063–4071.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.04.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maniatis K, Beenackers AACM (2000) Tar protocols. IEA bioenergy gasification task: introduction. Biomass Bioenergy 18(1):1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00072-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mansaray KG, Ghaly AE, Al-Taweel AM, Hamdullahpur F, Ugursan VI (1999) Air gasification of rice husk in a dual distributor type fluidized bed gasifier. Biomass Bioenergy 17(4):315–332.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00046-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McKendry P (2002) Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Biores Technol 83(1):37–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00118-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Natarajan E, Nordin A, Rao AN (1998) Overview of combustion and gasification of rice husk in fluidized bed reactors. Biomass Bioenergy 14(5):533–546.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(97)10060-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pham TMT, Kurisu K, Hanaki K (2011) Greenhouse gas emission mitigation potential of rice husks for an Giang Province, Vietnam. Biomass Bioenergy 35(8):3656–3666.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.05.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rabou LPLM, Zwart R, Vreugdenhil B, Bos L (2009) Tar in biomass producer gas, the Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN) experience: an enduring challenge. Energy Fuels 23(12):6189–6198.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef9007032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sansaniwal SK, Pal K, Rosen MA, Tyagi SK (2017) Recent advances in the development of biomass gasification technology: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 72:363–384.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmid JC, Pröll T, Kitzler H, Pfeifer C, Hofbauer H (2012) Cold flow model investigations of the countercurrent flow of a dual circulating fluidized bed gasifier. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 12(3):229–244.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-012-0035-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Virginie M, Adánez J, Courson C, Diego LF, García-Labiano F, Niznansky D, Kiennemann A, Gayán P, Abad A (2012) Effect of Fe-olivine on the tar content during biomass gasification in a dual fluidized bed. Appl Catal B 121–122:214–222.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wolfesberger-Schwabl U (2009) First test runs and tar analyses of a low temperature pyrolysis biomass pilot plant. Master thesis, Vienna University of Technology, Austria. https://www.bioenergy2020.eu/files/publications/pdf/CII1-9.pdf. Accessed 16 Apr 2019
  23. Wolfesberger-Schwabl U, Aigner I, Hofbauer H (2012) Mechanism of tar generation during fluidized bed gasification and low temperature pyrolysis. Ind Eng Chem Res 51(40):13001–13007.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie300827d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. World Energy Council (WEC) (2016) World Energy Resources 2016—bioenergy. https://www.worldenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/World-Energy-Resources-Full-report-2016.10.03.pdf. Accessed 16 Apr 2019

Copyright information

© Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Chemistry and Technology PraguePrague 6 DejviceCzech Republic
  2. 2.Vienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations