Chemical Papers

, Volume 74, Issue 2, pp 651–661 | Cite as

A theoretical and industrial study of component co-adsorption on 3A zeolite: an industrial case

  • Lotfolah Jafari
  • Hojatollah Moradi
  • Yadollah TavanEmail author
Original Paper


The 3A zeolite is an excellent adsorbent for natural gas dehydration due to low energy requirement in regeneration step and easy operation. To perform a reliable modeling, a good equilibrium adsorption isotherm is mandatory. Accordingly, water, methane, methyl mercaptan (M-mercaptan) and CO2 adsorption isotherms and also the competitive adsorption loading versus temperature are described for the system using molecular simulation and mathematical models. It is found that CO2 competes with water for adsorption on 3A and lower temperature is required for selective removal of water. The mathematical model results showed that M-mercaptan and CO2 quickly adsorb on 3A and capacity of 3A for water adsorption is reduced when impurities exist. The regeneration of saturated bed showed that higher temperatures cause lower desiccant loading. The experiments showed that co-adsorption of mercaptans leads to off-spec regeneration gas and some process modifications are then conducted to decrease its consequences. Finally, a decrease in regeneration gas temperature from 240 to 200 °C and adsorption time from 16 to 12 h resulted in lower gas flaring from 1.2 × 106 standard cubic meters per day (MMSCMD) to 0.3 MMSCMD, in industrial scale.


LTA Gas dehydration Molecular simulation Adsorption isotherm Mathematical model 



  1. Aimoli CG, Maginn EJ, Abreu CRA (2014) Thermodynamic properties of supercritical mixtures of carbon dioxide and methane: a molecular simulation study. J Chem Eng Data 59:3041–3054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AL-Asheh S, Banat F, AL-Lagtah N (2004) separation of ethanol-water mixtures using molecular sieves and biobased adsorbents. Chem Eng Res Des 82:855–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker RW, Lokhandwala K (2008) Natural gas processing with membranes: an overview. Ind Eng Chem Res 47:2109–2121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Demontis P, Suffritti GB (2009) A comment on the flexibility of framework in molecular dynamics simulations of zeolites. Micropor Mesopor Mater 3125:160–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doroudian Rad M, Fatemi S, Mirfendereski SM (2012) Development of T type zeolite for separation of CO2 from CH4 in adsorption processes. Chem Eng Res Des 90:1687–1695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gandhidasan P, Al-Farayedhi AA, Al-Mubarak AA (2001) Dehydration of natural gas using solid desiccants. Energy 26:855–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. García-Sánchez A, García-Pérez E, Dubbeldam D, Krishna R, Calero S (2007) A simulation study of alkanes in Linde type A zeolites. Adsorpt Sci Technol 25:417–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gholami M, Talaie MR (2010) Investigation of simplifying assumptions in mathematical modeling of natural gas dehydration using adsorption process and introduction of a new accurate LDF model. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:838–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gholami M, Talaie MR, Roodpeyma S (2010) Mathematical modeling of gas dehydration using adsorption process. Chem Eng Sci 65:5942–5949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gas Processors Suppliers Association (2004) GPSA Engineering Data Book, 12th edn. Gas Processors Suppliers Association, TulsaGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo S, Yu C, Gu X, Jin W, Zhong J, Chen CL (2011) Simulation of adsorption, diffusion, and permeability of water and ethanol in NaA zeolite membranes. J Membr Sci 376:40–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Accessed Jan 2015
  13. Karimi A, Abedinzadegan Abdi M (2009) Selective dehydration of high-pressure natural gas using supersonic nozzles. Chem Eng Process 48:560–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kohl AL, Nielsen RB (1974) Gas Purification, 2nd edn. Gulf Publication Company, TexasGoogle Scholar
  15. Llano-Restrepo M, Mosquera MA (2009) Accurate correlation, thermochemistry, and structural interpretation of equilibrium adsorption isotherms of water vapor in zeolite 3A by means of a generalized statistical thermodynamic adsorption model. Fluid Phas Equilib 283:73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lopes FVS, Grande CA, Ribeiro AM, Loureiro JM, Evaggelos O, Nikolakis V, Rodrigues AE (2009) Adsorption of H2, CO2, CH4, CO, N2 and H2O in activated carbon and zeolite for hydrogen production. Sep Sci Technol 44:1045–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Machado PB, Monteiro JGM, Medeiros JL, Epsom HD, Araujo OQF (2012) Supersonic separation in onshore natural gas dew point plant. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 6:43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Molecular sieves and their applications, CECA instructions, June 2008Google Scholar
  19. Nalaparaju A, Khurana M, Farooq S, Karimi IA, Jiang JW (2015) CO2 capture in cation-exchanged metal–organic frameworks: holistic modeling from molecular simulation to process optimization. Chem Eng Sci 124:70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Netusil M, Ditl P (2011) Comparison of three methods for natural gas dehydration. J Nat Gas Chem 20:471–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Newsome D, Coppens MO (2015) Molecular dynamics as a tool to study heterogeneity in zeolites-Effect of Na+ cations on diffusion of CO2 and N2 in Na-ZSM-5. Chem Eng Sci 121:300–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Orozco GA, Lachet V, Mackie AD (2014) A molecular simulation study of aqueous solutions of amines and alkanolamines: mixture properties and structural analysis. Mol Simul 40:123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shirazian S, Ashrafizadeh SN (2015) Synthesis of substrate-modified LTA zeolite membranes for dehydration of natural gas. Fuel 148:112–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Simond MR, Ballerat-Busserolles K, Coxam JY, Padua AAH (2012) Molecular simulations of primary alkanolamines using an extendable force field. Chem Phys Chem 13:3866–3874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Taheri Qazvini O, Fatemi S (2015) Modeling and simulation pressure–temperature swing adsorption process to remove mercaptan from humid natural gas; a commercial case study. Sep Purif Technol 139:88–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tavan Y, Shahhosseini S, Hosseini SH (2014) Design and simulation of ethane recovery process in an extractive dividing wall column. J Clean Prod 72:222–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wen C, Cao X, Yang Y (2011) Swirling flow of natural gas in supersonic separators. Chem Eng Process 50:644–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wen C, Cao X, Yang Y, Zhang J (2012) Evaluation of natural gas dehydration in supersonic swirling separators applying the Discrete Particle Method. Adv Powder Technol 23:228–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Accessed Mar 18 2015
  30. Yang Y, Wen C, Wang S, Feng Y (2014a) Numerical simulation of real gas flows in natural gas supersonic separation processing. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 21:829–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yang Y, Wen C, Wang S, Feng Y (2014b) Theoretical and numerical analysis on pressure recovery of supersonic separators for natural gas dehydration. Appl Energy 132:248–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Head of Dehydration UnitIlam Gas Treating CompanyIlamIran
  2. 2.School of Chemical Engineering, College of EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  3. 3.Chemical and Petroleum Engineering DepartmentSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations