Chemical Papers

, Volume 73, Issue 11, pp 2667–2678 | Cite as

Improved environmental stability of HTM free perovskite solar cells by a modified deposition route

  • Zeinab Safari
  • Mahmood Borhani ZarandiEmail author
  • Mohamad Reza Nateghi
Original Paper


A three-step sequential deposition route (TSDR) is proposed for the growth of perovskite crystals. By this way, a compact perovskite layer containing large crystal grains is formed. The layer is thicker (~ 1.0 µm) with good coverage of substrate compared to those deposited by conventional two-step or sequential deposition route (SDR). Photovoltaic performance of solar cells containing perovskite crystals grown by TSDR-I improves in a longer time (more than 30 days) compared to those fabricated by conventional SDR. In other words, a simple modification (growth of perovskite crystals in two steps) considerably enhances the thickness and compactness of the photo absorber layer containing dominantly large crystals including the lower amount of PbI2 in the core of perovskite grains. Presence of large perfect crystals forming compact perovskite layer inhibits the penetration of the oxygen or humidity deeply inside the film give rise to higher stable performance of the fabricated sample cells. On the other hand in a reverse way (TSDR-II), it is very interesting that dipping the PbI2 layer in high and then low concentration MAI solutions and applying an annealing process between each dipping step results in a very small perovskite crystal grains (~ 70 nm).


Perovskite crystals Photovoltaic Solar cells Three-step sequential deposition route 



  1. Ahn N, Kang MS, Lee JW et al (2015) Thermodynamic regulation of CH3NH3PbI3 crystal growth and its effect on photovoltaic performance of perovskite solar cell. J Mater Chem 3(39):19901–19906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babayigit A, Ethirajan A, Muller M et al (2016a) Toxicity of organometal halide perovskite solar cells. Nat Mater 15(3):247–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babayigit A, Thanh DD, Ethirajan A et al (2016b) Assessing the toxicity of Pb-and Sn-based perovskite solar cells in model organism Danio rerio. Sci Rep 6(1):18721–18731PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bai S, Sakai N, Zhang W et al (2017) Reproducible planar heterojunction solar cells based on one-step solution-processed methylammonium lead halide perovskites. Chem Mater 29(1):462–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baikie T, Fang Y, Kadro JM et al (2013) Synthesis and crystal chemistry of the hybrid perovskite (CH3NH3) PbI3for solid-state sensitised solar cell applications. J Mater Chem A 1(18):5628–5641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bella F, Renzi P et al (2018) Caesium for perovskite solar cells: an overview chemistry. Eur J 24(47):1–24Google Scholar
  7. Bi D, Yang L, Boschloo G et al (2013) Effect of different hole transport materials on recombination in CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite sensitized mesoscopic solar cells. J Phys Chem Lett 4(9):1532–1536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calado P, Telford AM, Bryant D et al (2016) Evidence for ion migration in hybrid perovskite solar cells with minimal hysteresis. Nat Commun 7(1):13831–13840PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen H, Yang S (2017) Carbon-based perovskite solar cells without hole transport materials: the front runner to the market? Adv Mater 29(24):1603410–1603994Google Scholar
  10. Chen Z, Dong Q, Liu Y et al (2017a) Thin single crystal perovskite solar cells to harvest below-bandgap light absorption. Nat Commun 8(1):1890–1897PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen J, Song J, Huang F et al (2017b) The role of synthesis parameters on crystallization and grain size in hybrid halide perovskite solar cells. J Phys Chem C 121(32):17053–17061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen Q, Zhou H, Hong Z et al (2013) Planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells via vapor-assisted solution process. J Am Chem Soc 136(2):622–625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen M, Wan L, Kong M et al (2018) Influence of Rutile-TiO2 nanorod arrays on Pb-free (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9-based hybrid perovskite solar cells fabricated through two-step sequential solution process. J Alloys Compd 738:422–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen BE, Etgar L (2016) Parameters that control and influence the organo-metal halide perovskite crystallization and morphology. Front Optoelectron 9(1):44–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Correa-Baena JP, Abate A, Saliba M et al (2017) The rapid evolution of highly efficient perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ Sci 10(3):710–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dualeh A, Tétreault N, Moehl T et al (2014) Effect of annealing temperature on film morphology of organic-inorganic hybrid pervoskite solid state solar cells. Adv Funct Mater 24(21):3250–3258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fan P, Gu D, Liang GX et al (2016) High performance perovskite CH3NH3PbI3 thin films for solar cells prepared by single-source physical vapour deposition. Sci Rep 6(1):29910–29919PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gao H, Bao C, Li F et al (2015) Nucleation and crystal growth of organic-inorganic lead halide perovskites under different relative humidity. ASC Appl Mater Interfaces  7(17):9110–9117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gratzel M (2014) The Light and shade of perovskite solar cells. Nat Mater 13(9):838–842PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Graetzel M, Janssen JR, Mitzi BD et al (2012) Materials interface engineering for solution-processed photovoltaics. Nat 488(7411):304–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hawash Z, Ono LK et al (2017) Recent advances in spiro-MeOTAD hole transport material and its applications in organic-inorganic halide perovskite solar cells. Adv Mater Interfaces 5(1):1700623–1700654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hodes G, Kamat PV (2015) Understanding the implication of carrier diffusion length in photovoltaic cells. J Phys Chem Lett 6(20):4090–4092PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang H, Xue Q, Chen B et al (2017) Top-down fabrication of stable methylammonium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals by employing a mixture of ligands as coordinating solvents. Angew Chemie Int Ed 56(32):9571–9576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ishikawa R, Watanabe S, Yamazaki S et al (2019) Perovskite/graphene solar cells without a hole-transport layer. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2(1):171–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacobsson JT, Correa-Baena JP, Anaraki EH et al (2016) Unreacted PbI2 as a double-edged sword for enhancing the performance of perovskite solar cells. J Am Chem Soc 138(32):10331–10343PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jahanbakhshi Zadeh N, Borhani Zarandi M, Nateghi MR (2018) Effect of crystallization strategies on CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite layer deposited by spin coating method: dependence of photovoltaic performance on morphology evolution. Thin Solid Films  660:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jahanbakhshi Zadeh N, Borhani Zarandi M, Nateghi MR (2019) Optical properties of the perovskite films deposited on meso-porous TiO2 by one step and hot casting techniques. Thin Solid Films 671:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kara K, Kara D, Kirbyk C et al (2016) Solvent washing with toluene enhances efficiency and increases reproducibility in perovskite solar cells. RSC Adv 6(32):26606–26611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim S, Chung T, Bae S et al (2017) Improved performance and thermal stability of perovskite solar cells prepared via a modified sequential deposition process. Org Electron 41:266–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kojima A, Teshima K, Shirai Y et al (2009) Organometal halide perovskites as visible- light sensitizers or photovoltaic cells. J Am Chem Soc 131(17):6050–6051PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee JW, Bae HS, Marco DN et al (2017) The role of grain boundaries in perovskite solar cells. Mater Today Energy 7:149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lei B, Eze OV, Mori T (2016) Effect of morphology control of light absorbing layer on CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 16(4):3176–3182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li D, Bretschneider AS, Bergmann VW et al (2016) Humidity-induced grain boundaries in MAPbI3 perovskite films. J Phys Chem C 120(12):6363–6368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li M, Yan X, Kang Z et al (2017a) Enhanced efficiency and stability of perovskite solar cells via anti-solvent treatment in two-step deposition method. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:7224–7231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li Y, Li H, Zhong C et al (2017b) Characterization of intrinsic hole transport in single-crystal spiro-OMeTAD. npj Flexible Electronics 1(1):2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu D, Gangishetty KM, Kelly LT (2014) Effect of CH3NH3PbI3 thickness on device efficiency in planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells. J Mater Chem A 2(46):19873–19881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu Z, Zhang M, Xu X et al (2015) p-Type mesoscopic NiO as an active interfacial layer for carbon counter electrode based perovskite solar cells. Dalton Trans 44(9):3967–3973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nakar R, Cho AN, Berton N et al (2018) Triphenylamine 3,6-carbazole derivative as hole-transporting material for mixed cation perovskite solar cells. Chem Pap 72(7):1779–1787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Okamoto Y, Suzuki Y (2017) Perovskite solar cells prepared by a new 3-step method including a PbI2 scavenging step. Mat Sci Semicon Proc 71:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ono LK, Raga RS, Remeika M et al (2015) Pinhole-free hole transport layers significantly improve the stability of MAPbI3 -based perovskite solar cells under operating conditions. J Mater Chem A 3:15451–15456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Patel BJ, Milot LR, Wright D et al (2016) Formation dynamics of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite following two-step layer deposition. J Phys Chem Lett 7(1):96–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rahul Singh KP, Singh R et al (2017) Effect of crystal and powder of CH3NH3I on the CH3NH3PbI3 based perovskite sensitized solar cell. Mater Res Bull 89:292–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Salado M, Contreras-Bernal L, Caliò L et al (2017) Impact of moisture on efficiency-determining electronic processes in perovskite solar cells. J Mater Chem AA 5(22):10917–10927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salado M, Kazim S, Ahmad S (2018) The role of Cs + inclusion in formamidinium lead triiodide-based perovskite solar cell.  Chem Pap 72(7):1645-1650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shao F, Xu L, Tian Z et al (2016) A modified two-step sequential deposition method for preparing perovskite CH3NH3PbI3 solar cells. RSC Adv 6(48):42377–42381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tenuta E, Zheng C et al (2016) Thermodynamic origin of instability in hybrid halide perovskites. Sci Rep 6(1):37654–37661PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tong Y, Bladt E, Aygüler FM et al. (2016) Highly luminescent cesium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals with tunable composition and thickness by ultrasonication. Angew Chemie Int Ed 55(44):13887–13892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wehrenfennig C, Eperon EG, Johnston BM et al. (2014) High charge carrier mobilities and lifetimes in organolead trihalide perovskites. Adv Mater  26(10):1584–1589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Xiao Z, Dong Q, Bi C et al (2014) Solvent annealing of perovskite-induced crystal growth for photovoltaic-device efficiency enhancement. Adv Mater 26(37):6503–6509PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yao Z, Wang W, Shen H et al (2017) CH3NH3PbI3 grain growth and interfacial properties in meso-structured perovskite solar cells fabricated by two-step deposition. Sci Technol Adv Mater 18(1):253–262PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ye F, Yang W et al (2017) Applications of cesium in the perovskite solar cells. J Semicond 38(1):011003–011041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yue S, Liu K, Xu R et al (2017) Efficacious engineering on charge extraction for realizing high-efficient perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ Sci 10(12):2570–2578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang H, Wang H, Williams TS et al (2017) SrCl2 Derived perovskite facilitating a high efficiency of 16% in hole-conductor-free fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cells. Adv Mater 29(15):1606608–1606616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zheng L, Ma Y, Chu S et al (2014) Improved light absorption and charge transport for perovskite solar cells with rough interfaces by sequential deposition. Nanoscale 6(14):8171–8176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhou Y, Yang M, Wu W et al (2015) Room temperature crystallization of hybrid-perovskite thin films via solvent–solvent extraction for high-performance solar cells. J Mater Chem A 3(15):8178–8184CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zeinab Safari
    • 1
  • Mahmood Borhani Zarandi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mohamad Reza Nateghi
    • 2
  1. 1.Atomic and Molecular Group, Faculty of PhysicsYazd UniversityYazdIran
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry, Yazd BranchIslamic Azad UniversityYazdIran

Personalised recommendations