Lignite pyrolysis with subsequent refining of volatile products in separately heated catalytic reactor Original Paper First Online: 16 April 2019 Abstract
Among volatile pyrolysis products are organic compounds containing nitrogen, sulfur or oxygen heteroatoms. As a result of this, liquid pyrolysis products in particular become unstable and susceptible to secondary reactions (polymerization, polycondensation, polyaddition), which lead to an increase of average molecular weight or even to the production of solid matter. This paper examines catalytic refining of oxygen, nitrogen and sulfur compounds found in volatile pyrolysis products from Czech lignite, by transformation into water, ammonia and hydrogen sulfide, and acquiring a liquid product suitable for further treatment. The volatile products were refined in gas phase in a separately heated catalytic reactor filled with Ni–W-based hydrocracking catalyst. The main goal of the experiments was to determine the effect of employing a thermo-catalytic reactor on the yielded amounts of individual products, and on the composition of the gaseous and liquid products of lignite pyrolysis. It was found that a higher pyrolysis temperature (650 °C) ensures a sufficient decomposition of pyrolyzed lignite and also a better composition of the gas than a pyrolysis carried out at the temperature of 550 °C. The use of a thermo-catalytic reactor does, on the one hand, results in a decreased yield of the liquid product including its organic phase, but there is an increased yield of light fraction in this organic phase.
Keywords Pyrolysis Catalytic pyrolysis Refining Volatile product Lignite List of symbols A d
Ash content in dry sample (%)
Carbon content in dry sample (%)
Hydrogen content in dry sample (%)
H g d
Gross calorific value (MJ kg
−1) H n d
Net calorific value (MJ kg
−1) N d
Nitrogen content in dry sample (%)
Oxygen content in dry sample (%)
S t d
Total sulfur content in dry sample (%)
Content of volatile compounds in dry sample (%)
Water content in analytic sample (%)
Thermal conductivity detector
Notes Compliance with ethical standards Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Ali M, Ahmed S, Qureshi MS (2011) Catalytic coprocessing of coal and petroleum residues with waste plastics to produce transportation fuels. Fuel Process Technol 92:1109–1120.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.01.006 CrossRef Google Scholar
Amin MN et al (2016) Pyrolysis of low rank coal by nickel based zeolite catalysts in the two-staged bed reactor. J Anal Appl Pyrol 118:54–62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.11.019 CrossRef Google Scholar
Appelt J, Heschel W, Meyer B (2016) Catalytic pyrolysis of central German lignite in a semi-continuous rotary kiln—performance of pulverized one-way ZSM-5 catalyst and ZSM-5-coated beads. Fuel Process Technol 144:56–63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.12.004 CrossRef Google Scholar
Ding L et al (2015a) Catalytic effects of Na
additive on coal pyrolysis and gasification. Fuel 142:134–144.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.11.010 CrossRef Google Scholar
Ding L et al (2015b) Gas evolution characteristics during pyrolysis and catalytic pyrolysis of coals by TG–MS and in a high-frequency furnace. Fuel 154:222–232.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.04.003 CrossRef Google Scholar
Grams J et al (2015) Influence of Ni catalyst support on the product distribution of cellulose fast pyrolysis vapors upgrading. J Anal Appl Pyrol 113:557–563.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.03.011 CrossRef Google Scholar
Han J et al (2014) Catalytic upgrading of coal pyrolysis tar over char-based catalysts. Fuel Process Technol 122:98–106.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.01.033 CrossRef Google Scholar
Jílková L et al (2011) Kopyrolýza hnědého uhlí a řepkových pokrutin. Paliva 3(4):119–125
Jílková L et al (2013) Pyrolýza hnědého uhlí s vysokým obsahem prchavých látek. Paliva 5(4):146–151
Jílková L, Ciahotný K, Kusý J (2014) Pyrolýza českého hnědého uhlí za přítomnosti katalyzátoru na bázi W-Ni na laboratorní jednotce. Paliva 6(4):59–62
Jin L et al (2013) Integrated coal pyrolysis with methane aromatization over Mo/HZSM-5 for improving tar yield. Fuel 114:187–190.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.01.024 CrossRef Google Scholar
Jin L et al (2016) In-situ catalytic upgrading of coal pyrolysis tar on carbon-based catalyst in a fixed-bed reactor. Fuel Process Technol 147:4–46.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.12.028 CrossRef Google Scholar
Kusý J et al (2012) Hydrogenation process of the tar obtained from the pyrolysis of brown coal. Fuel 101:38–44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.08.016 CrossRef Google Scholar
Li G et al (2014) Improving aromatic hydrocarbons yield from coal pyrolysis volatile products over HZSM-5 and Mo-modified HZSM-5. Fuel 130:154–159.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.04.027 CrossRef Google Scholar
Li X et al (2016) Semi-coke as solid heat carrier for low-temperature coal tar upgrading. Fuel Process Technol 143:79–85.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.11.013 CrossRef Google Scholar
Lin H et al (2010) Hydrocarbon fuels produced by catalytic pyrolysis of hospital plastic wastes in a fluidizing cracking process. Fuel Process Technol 91:1355–1363.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.03.016 CrossRef Google Scholar
Rostrup-Nielsen JR (2002) Syngas in perspective. Catal Today 71:243–247.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(01)00454-0 CrossRef Google Scholar
Shen Y et al (2014) In-situ catalytic conversion of tar using rice husk char-supported nickel-iron catalysts for biomass pyrolysis/gasification. Appl Catal B 152-153:140–151.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.01.032 CrossRef Google Scholar
Shen Y et al (2015) In situ catalytic conversion of tar using rice husk char/ash supported nickel–iron catalysts for biomass pyrolytic gasification combined with the mixing-simulation in fluidized-bed gasifier. Appl Energy 160:808–819.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.074 CrossRef Google Scholar
Syamsiro M et al (2014) Fuel oil production from municipal plastic wastes in sequential pyrolysis and catalytic reforming reactors. Energy Proc 47:180–188.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.212 CrossRef Google Scholar
Wei W, Jinlong G (2010) Methanation of carbon dioxide: an overview. Front Chem Sci Eng 5:2–10
CrossRef Google Scholar
Wu Z, Sugimoto Y, Kawashima H (2001) Catalytic nitrogen release during a fixed-bed pyrolysis of model coals containing pyrrolic or pyridinic. Fuel 80:251–254
CrossRef Google Scholar
Yan L et al (2015) Catalytic upgrading of gaseous tars over zeolite catalysts during coal pyrolysis. Fuel Process Technol 138:424–429.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.05.030 CrossRef Google Scholar
Yang J, Cai NA (2006) TG-FTIR study on catalytic pyrolysis of coal. J Fuel Chem Technol 34(6):650–654
CrossRef Google Scholar
Zhang B et al (2015) Catalytic upgrading of fast pyrolysis biomass vapors over fresh, spent and regenerated ZSM-5 zeolites. Fuel Process Technol 138:430–434.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.06.011 CrossRef Google Scholar Copyright information
© Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2019