Advertisement

A survey on exergy, energy and environmental analysis of sulfur recovery unit in case of five intensified configurations

  • Ali Rostami
  • Yadollah TavanEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

In this study, a combination of energy and exergy analysis is applied for the industrial sulfur recovery unit (SRU) in commercial simulation software. The data of energy and exergy are obtained from the simulator and Excel (for physical and chemical exergy), respectively. In doing so, five intensified SRU configurations namely: (1) hot gas bypass (2) acid gas bypass (3) inlet stream preheating (4) acid gas enrichment and (5) oxygen (air) enrichment are compared in terms of energy production, reaction furnace temperature, sulfur recovery and pollutant emission into environment. Then, irreversibility in these five arrangements is compared and all the proposed methods show higher useful exergy comparing to the design case while the preheating method was the highest. Eventually, the main contributors and sources of exergy destruction are first incinerator (about 29–36%), then reaction furnace and waste heat boiler.

Keywords

Sulfur recovery unit Energy Exergy Reaction furnace Incinerator Environment 

Notes

References

  1. I. Dincer, M.A. Rosen, Exergy, energy, environment and sustainable development, 2nd edition, Elsevier Ltd, 2013.Google Scholar
  2. D. Flórez-Orrego, S. de Oliveira Junior, exergy assessment of single and dual pressure industrial ammonia synthesis units, Energ. 2017, DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.139.Google Scholar
  3. S. Ibrahim, R.K. Rahman, A. Raj, Effects of H2O in the feed of sulfur recovery unit on sulfur production and aromatics emission from Claus furnace, Ind. Eng, Chem. Res. 2017, DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02553.Google Scholar
  4. R.K. Rahman, A. Raj, S. Ibrahim, M.I. Khan, N.O. Al Muhairi, Reduction in natural gas consumption in sulfur recovery units through kinetic simulation using a detailed reaction mechanism, Ind. Eng, Chem. Res. 2018, DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04667.Google Scholar
  5. Samavati M, Santarelli M, Martin A, Nemanova V (2018) Production of synthetic Fischer-Tropsch diesel from renewables: Thermoeconomic and environmental analysis. Energy Fuel 32:1744–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. N. Sato, Chemical energy and exergy: an introduction to chemical thermodynamics for engineers, Elsevier science and technology books, 2004.Google Scholar
  7. Sharifzadeh M, Ghazikhani M, Niazmand H (2017) Temporal exergy analysis of adsorption cooling system by developing non-flow exergy function. Appl. Therm. Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.12.128 Google Scholar
  8. T.J Kotas, The exergy method of thermal plant analysis, Butterworths, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Head of Sulfur Recovery Unit, Gas Refining DisciplineIlam Gas Treating CompanyIlamIran
  2. 2.Chemical and Petroleum Engineering DepartmentSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations