Advertisement

Design and optimization of open-channel water ultraviolet disinfection reactor

  • Tipu SultanEmail author
  • Zeshan Ahmad
  • Khazar Hayat
Original Paper
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

Design and optimization have developed gradually from a methodology for academic attraction into a technology that has made a significant impact on the industrial growth. A careful and well-optimized design of open-channel water ultraviolet (UV) disinfection reactor ensures the achievement of minimum UV dose required, as well as allowing the minimum operational costs. Such UV reactors are mostly utilized in water treatment plants throughout the world to provide the system for disinfecting the drinking water. Yet, at present, lack of rigorous quantitative understanding of behavior in such reactor geometries is shown to limit the versatile and efficient optimization of UV reactor. A new UV reactor design concept is essential that should be able to consider the three significant parameters, namely: uniform UV light propagation within the open-channel UV reactor, providing optimum lamp positioning within the volume of the UV reactor and should allow optimum flow rate of the water. It is approved that computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation can be used as a quick and cheap means for design and optimization of water disinfection UV reactor. A novel design and optimization approach which combines CFD modeling, design of experiment (DOE), response surface method (RSM) and goal-driven optimization (GDO) was presented for open-channel water UV disinfection reactor. This methodology includes a heuristic approach from scratch to the final optimal solution. The optimal design variables which have the optimum value of the object functions were identified through proposed methodology. The results showed that the CFD method can be employed for estimation of the optimum design, even though the shape of the open-channel UV reactor is complex. The CFD results reveal that the UV dose distribution and flow of water were largely dependent on the lamp positioning. This paper demonstrates that UV reactor optimization in conceptual design is possible using a commercial CFD package. As a conclusion, the proposed design and optimization technique based on DOE, RSM and GDO could be a suitable technique prior to a final design of open-channel water UV disinfection reactor.

Keywords

CFD Fluence rate Open-channel Optimization Reactor design Water disinfection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to appreciate the NEOTEC UV Seoul, Republic of Korea for providing the UV fluence rate modeling tool UVCalc3D for this research work. The author would like to gratefully acknowledge the financial support received from the Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan under the HRDI-UESTPs/UETs scholarship program for this research work.

Supplementary material

11696_2019_694_MOESM1_ESM.docx (233 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 233 kb)

References

  1. ANSYS (2015a) ANSYS®DesignXplorer, Academic Research, Release 15.0. ANSYS Inc, CanonsburgGoogle Scholar
  2. ANSYS (2015b) ANSYS® Fluent, Academic Research, Release 15.0. ANSYS Inc, CanonsburgGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolton JR, Linden KG (2003) Standardization of methods for fluence (UV dose) determination in bench-scale UV experiments. J Environ Eng 129(3):209–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolton JR, Mayor-Smith I, Linden KG (2015) Rethinking the concepts of fluence (UV dose) and fluence rate: the importance of photon-based units—a systemic review. Photochem Photobiol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/php.12512 Google Scholar
  5. Brahmi M, Hassen A (2011) Disinfection of wastewater by UV irradiation: influence of hydrodynamics on the performance of the disinfection. Environ Eng Res 16(4):243–252.  https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2011.16.4.243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ducoste J, Alpert S (2011) Assessing the UV dose delivered from two UV reactors in series: can you always assume doubling the UV dose from individual reactor validations? Paper presented at the Proceedings of 2nd North American Conference on Ozone, Ultraviolet and Advanced Oxidation Technologies, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  7. Gandhi V, Roberts PJ, Stoesser T, Wright H, Kim J-H (2011) UV reactor flow visualization and mixing quantification using three-dimensional laser-induced fluorescence. Water Res 45(13):3855–3862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Graham DI, Moyeed RA (2002) How many particles for my Lagrangian simulations? Powder Technol 125(2):179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ho C (2009) Evaluation of reflection and refraction in simulations of ultraviolet disinfection using the discrete ordinates radiation model. Water Sci Technol 2009:2421–2428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Josset S, Taranto J, Keller N, Keller V, Lett M-C (2010) Photocatalytic treatment of bioaerosols: impact of the reactor design. Environ Sci Technol 44(7):2605–2611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kai-Tai F, Runze L, Agus S (2006) Design and modeling for computer experiments. Computer science and data analysis series. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  12. Koutchma T, Keller S, Chirtel S, Parisi B (2004) Ultraviolet disinfection of juice products in laminar and turbulent flow reactors. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 5(2):179–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2004.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lawryshyn Y, Hofmann R (2015) Theoretical evaluation of UV reactors in series. J Environ Eng 141:04015023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li M, Qiang Z, Bolton JR (2013) In situ detailed fluence rate distributions in a UV reactor with multiple low-pressure lamps: comparison of experimental and model results. Chem Eng J 214:55–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.10.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li W, Li M, Bolton JR, Qiang Z (2016) Configuration optimization of UV reactors for water disinfection with computational fluid dynamics: feasibility of using particle minimum UV dose as a performance indicator. Chem Eng J 306:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li H, Osman H, Kang C, Ba T (2017) Numerical and experimental investigation of UV disinfection for water treatment. Appl Therm Eng 111:280–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu D, Ducoste J, Jin S, Linden K (2004) Evaluation of alternative fluence rate distribution models. Aqua 53:391–408Google Scholar
  18. Lyn D (2004) Steady and unsteady simulations of turbulent flow and transport in ultraviolet disinfection channels. J Hydraul Eng 130(8):762–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lyn D, Blatchley E III (2005) Numerical computational fluid dynamics-based models of ultraviolet disinfection channels. J Environ Eng 131(6):838–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lyn D, Chiu K, Blatchley E III (1999) Numerical modeling of flow and disinfection in UV disinfection channels. J Environ Eng 125(1):17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mamane H, Colorni A, Bar I, Ori I, Mozes N (2010) The use of an open channel, low pressure UV reactor for water treatment in low head recirculating aquaculture systems (LH-RAS). Aquacult Eng 42(3):103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Munoz A, Kresta S, Craik SA (2007) Computational fluid dynamics for predicting performance of ultraviolet disinfection—sensitivity to particle tracking inputs. J Environ Eng Sci 6(3):285–301.  https://doi.org/10.1139/s06-045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nishi Y, Kashiwagi M, Koterayama W, Nakamura M, Hua SZ, Yamamoto I, Hyakudome T (2007) Resistance and propulsion performance of an underwater vehicle estimated by a CFD method and experiment. Paper presented at the the seventeenth international offshore and polar engineering conferenceGoogle Scholar
  24. Qiang Z, Li M, Bolton JR, Qu J, Wang C (2013) Estimating the fluence delivery in UV disinfection reactors using a ‘detector-model’combination method. Chem Eng J 233:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saha RK (2013) Numerical simulation of an open channel ultraviolet waste-water disinfection reactor (Master of Engineering Science Master’s thesis), The University of Western Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  26. Samstag R, Ducoste J, Griborio A, Nopens I, Batstone D, Wicks J, Laurent J (2016) CFD for wastewater treatment: an overview. Water Sci Technol 74(3):549–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sultan T (2016) Numerical study of the effects of lamp configuration and reactor wall roughness in an open channel water disinfection UV reactor. Chemosphere 155:170–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sultan T, Cho J-S (2016) Methodology considering surface roughness in UV water disinfection reactors. Chem Pap 70(6):777–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sultan T, Ahmad S, Cho J (2016a) Numerical study of the effects of surface roughness on water disinfection UV reactor. Chemosphere 148:108–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sultan T, Ahmad Z, Cho J (2016b) Optimization of lamp arrangement in a closed-conduit UV reactor based on a genetic algorithm. Water Sci Technol 73(10):2526–2543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sultan T, Ahmad Z, Anwar Z, Shahzad Khurram M (2017) Impact of asymmetric lamp positioning on the performance of a closed-conduit UV reactor. Ain Shams Eng J 8(2):225–235.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2016.08.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tan KC, Khor EF, Lee TH (2006) Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms and applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  33. Wols B, Hofman J, Beerendonk E, Uijttewaal W, Van Dijk J (2011) A systematic approach for the design of UV reactors using computational fluid dynamics. AIChE J 57(1):193–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Xu C, Rangaiah G, Zhao X (2015) Application of artificial neural network and genetic programming in modeling and optimization of ultraviolet water disinfection reactors. Chem Eng Commun 202(11):1415–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Younis B, Yang T (2010) Computational modeling of ultraviolet disinfection. Water Sci Technol 62(8):1872–1878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Younis B, Yang T (2011) Prediction of the effects of vortex shedding on UV disinfection efficiency. Aqua J Water Supply Res Technol 60(3):147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang J, Tejada-Martínez AE, Zhang Q (2014) Developments in computational fluid dynamics-based modeling for disinfection technologies over the last two decades: a review. Environ Model Softw 58:71–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhao X, Alpert SM, Ducoste JJ (2009) Assessing the impact of upstream hydraulics on the dose distribution of ultraviolet reactors using fluorescence microspheres and computational fluid dynamics. Environ Eng Sci 26(5):947–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering (SEN), Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Management and TechnologyLahorePakistan
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering Department (Old Campus)The University of LahoreLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations