Chemical Papers

, Volume 73, Issue 4, pp 1013–1018 | Cite as

Authenticity investigation of bovine tallow for biodiesel production via mass spectrometry: a comparison with traditional methodology

  • Patrícia Daniele da Silva do Santos
  • Natália Vendramini dos Reis
  • Roberta da SilveiraEmail author
  • Marília Bellanda Galuch
  • Jesuí Vergílio Visentainer
  • Oscar Oliveira Santos
Original Paper


Biodiesel has emerged as a promising alternative to fossil fuels due to advantages related to sustainability and reduction of polluting gases emission and, in Brazil, the main raw materials used by biodiesel industry are soybean oil and bovine tallow, however, bovine tallow stands out due to its low cost, supply without competition with food market, high calorific value, high number of cetanes, and most importantly, because of its 100% conversion rate. It is produced by transesterification or esterification process of triglycerides with low content of free fatty acids or raw material rich in free fatty acids in the presence of a catalyst. The extensive usage of bovine tallow in biodiesel production values it, and similar to important commodities, it has also been frequently adulterated with the addition of specific products (frying residual oils and other animal fats from industrial by-products) decreasing the raw material quality. Consequently, there is a need for fast and reliable analytical methods for quality control. Therefore, this work evaluated the lipid quality of bovine tallow provided by biodiesel industry to confirm its authenticity; fatty acid composition was obtained by gas chromatography coupled with flame ionization detector. The lipid profile was obtained by fingerprint applying direct electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Additionally, the lipid profile obtained for bovine tallow samples were compared with the lipid profiles obtained for soybean oil, poultry oil and a standard bovine tallow. Conclusively, fraud in bovine tallow by poultry oil was observed in one sample.


Direct infusion ESI–MS CG–FID Poultry oil 



To CNPq, CAPES, Fundação Araucaria for the financial support and grant of the scholarship. To the State and the Universidade Estadual de Maringá for making the necessary technologies available for the development of this research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. AOCS (2013) Physical and chemical characteristics of oils, fats, and waxes, 2nd edn. AOCS Press, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  2. Atadashi IM, Aroua MK, Aziz ARA, Sulaiman NMN (2012) Production of biodiesel using high free fatty acid feedstocks. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:3275–3285. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ (1959) A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37:911–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cabral EC, da Cruz GF, Simas RC et al (2013) Typification and quality control of the Andiroba (Carapa guianensis) oil via mass spectrometry fingerprinting. Anal Methods 5:1385. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carbonera F, Bonafe EG, Martin CA et al (2014) Effect of dietary replacement of sunflower oil with perilla oil on the absolute fatty acid composition in Nile tilapia (GIFT). Food Chem 148:230–234. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Catharino RR, Haddad R, Cabrini LG et al (2005) Characterization of vegetable oils by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry fingerprinting: classification, quality, adulteration, and aging. Anal Chem 77:7429–7433. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eide I, Zahlsen K (2007) Chemical fingerprinting of biodiesel using electrospray mass spectrometry and chemometrics: characterization, discrimination, identification, and quantification in petrodiesel. Energy Fuels 21:3702–3708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fang G, Goh JY, Tay M et al (2013) Characterization of oils and fats by 1H NMR and GC/MS fingerprinting: classification, prediction and detection of adulteration. Food Chem 138:1461–1469. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fazal MA, Suhaila NR, Haseeb ASMA et al (2018) Influence of copper on the instability and corrosiveness of palm biodiesel and its blends: an assessment on biodiesel sustainability. J Clean Prod 171:1407–1414. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galuch MB, Carbonera F, Magon TFS et al (2018) Quality assessment of omega-3 supplements available in the Brazilian market. J Braz Chem Soc 29:631–638Google Scholar
  11. Glaude PA, Fournet R, Bounaceur R, Molière M (2010) Adiabatic flame temperature from biofuels and fossil fuels and derived effect on NOx emissions. Fuel Process Technol 91(2):229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gomes LFS, Souza SNM, Bariccatti RA et al (2004) Potencial de produção de biodiesel a partir do óleo de frango nas cooperativas do oeste do Paraná. Revista Varia Scientia, vol 04, no 08, pp 133–146Google Scholar
  13. International Standard Organization (2008) ISO 6884 “Animal and vegetable fats and oils—determination of ash”Google Scholar
  14. International Standard Organization (2009) ISO 660: “Animal and vegetable fats and oils—determination of acid value and acidity”Google Scholar
  15. International Standard Organization (2014) 12966-1 “Animal and vegetable fats and oils—Gas chromatography of fatty acid methyl esters—Part 1: Guidelines on modern gas chromatography of fatty acid methyl esters”Google Scholar
  16. International Standard Organization (2016) ISO 662 “Animal and vegetable fats and oils—Determination of moisture and volatile matter content”Google Scholar
  17. International Standard Organization (2017) ISO 12966-2 “Animal and vegetable fats and oils—gas chromatography of fatty acid methyl esters—Part 2: preparation of methyl esters of fatty acids”Google Scholar
  18. International Standard Organization (2018) ISO 3691 “Animal and vegetable fats and oils—determination of iodine value”Google Scholar
  19. Manuale DL, Torres GC, Badano JM et al (2013) Adjustment of the biodiesel free fatty acids content by means of adsorption. Energy Fuels 27:6763–6772. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mittelbach M, Remscmidth C (2004) Biodiesel: the comprehensive handbook. 1a editionGoogle Scholar
  21. Moraes MSA, Krause LC, da Cunha ME et al (2008) Tallow biodiesel: properties evaluation and consumption tests in a diesel engine. Energy Fuels 22:1949–1954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muthukumaran C, Praniesh R, Navamani P, Swathi R, Sharmila G, Kumar NM (2017) Process optimization and kinetic modeling of biodiesel production using non-edible Madhuca indica oil. Fuel 195:217–225. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pereira E, Napp A, Braun JV, Fountoura LAM, Seferin M, Ayres J, Ligabue R, Passaglia LMP, Vainstein MH (2018) Development and validation of analytical methodology by GC-FID using hexadecyl propanoate as an internal standard to determine the bovine tallow methyl esters content. J Chromatogr B 1093–1094:134–140. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Qu L, Wang Z, Zhang J (2016) Influence of waste cooking oil biodiesel on oxidation reactivity and nanostructure of particulate matter from diesel engine. Fuel 181:389–395. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ramos LP et al (2003) Biodiesel: um projeto de sustentabilidade econômica e sócio ambiental para o Brasil. Revista Biotecnologia, Ciência e Desenvolvimento, local 31:28–37Google Scholar
  26. Santos LS, Dalmazio I, Eberlin MN et al (2006) Mimicking the atmospheric OH-radical-mediated photooxidation of isoprene: formation of cloud-condensation nuclei polyols monitored by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. In: Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 2104–2108.
  27. Silveira R, Vágula JM, Figueiredo IDL et al (2017) Rapid methodology via mass spectrometry to quantify addition of soybean oil in extra virgin olive oil: a comparison with traditional methods adopted by food industry to identify fraud. Food Res Int 102:43–50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Soares S, Melchert WR, Rocha FRP (2017) A flow-based procedure exploiting the lab-in-syringe approach for the determination of ester content in biodiesel and diesel/biodiesel blends. Talanta 174:556–561. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vaclavik L, Hrbek V, Cajka T et al (2011) Authentication of animal fats using direct analysis in real time (DART) ionization—mass spectrometry and chemometric tools. J Agric Food Chem 59:5919–5926. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Visentainer JV (2012) Aspectos analíticos da resposta do detector de ionização em chama para ésteres de ácidos graxos em biodiesel e alimentos. Quim Nova 35:274–279. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrícia Daniele da Silva do Santos
    • 1
  • Natália Vendramini dos Reis
    • 2
  • Roberta da Silveira
    • 3
    Email author
  • Marília Bellanda Galuch
    • 1
  • Jesuí Vergílio Visentainer
    • 1
  • Oscar Oliveira Santos
    • 1
  1. 1.APLE-A, Departamento de QuímicaUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)MaringáBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Engenharia QuímicaUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)MaringáBrazil
  3. 3.Programa de pós graduação em Ciências de AlimentosUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)MaringáBrazil

Personalised recommendations