Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILSG) has been proposed as an alternative to conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (CLSG) in obese patients. This study aims to compare the surgical outcomes of these two techniques.
A meta-analysis of existing literature obtained through a systematic literature search in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library CENTRAL databases from 2009 to 2019 was conducted.
Eleven articles including 1168 patients were analyzed. Patients in the SILSG group reported greater satisfaction with cosmetic scar outcomes than those in the CLSG group (SMD = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.10 to 3.83, P = 0.00). There was no significant difference between the SILSG group and the CLSG group regarding operative time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, conversion rate, intraoperative complications, length of hospital stay, postoperative analgesia, postoperative complications, excess weight loss (EWL), and improvements in comorbidities (P > 0.05).
Compared to CLSG, SILSG resulted in improved cosmetic satisfaction and showed no disadvantages in terms of surgical outcomes; thus, SILSG can serve as an alternative to CLSG for obese patients. Nonetheless, high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with large study populations and long follow-up periods are needed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Collaboration NCDRF. Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387(10026):1377–96.
Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, et al. Bariatric-metabolic surgery versus conventional medical treatment in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: 5 year follow-up of an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9997):964–73.
Angrisani L. 2014: the year of the sleeve supremacy. Obes Surg. 2017;27(6):1626–7.
Saber AA, Elgamal MH, Itawi EA, et al. Single incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILSG): a novel technique. Obes Surg. 2008;18(10):1338–42.
Magouliotis DE, Tasiopoulou VS, Svokos AA, et al. Single incision versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018;28(6):690–9.
Dimitrokallis N, Alexandrou A, Schizas D, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: review and a critical appraisal. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(3):217–26.
Mognol P, Chosidow D, Marmuse JP. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial bariatric operation for high-risk patients: initial results in 10 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15(7):1030–3.
Roa PE, Kaidar-Person O, Pinto D, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as treatment for morbid obesity: technique and short-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2006;16(10):1323–6.
Alptekin H, Yilmaz H, Acar F, et al. Incisional hernia rate may increase after single-port cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012;22(8):731–7.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–12.
Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;20(5):13.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.
Delgado S, Ibarzabal A, Adelsdorfer C, et al. Transumbilical single-port sleeve gastrectomy: initial experience and comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(5):1247–53.
Gomberawalla A, Salamat A, Lutfi R. Outcome analysis of single incision vs traditional multiport sleeve gastrectomy: a matched cohort study. Obes Surg. 2014;24(11):1870–4.
Lakdawala M, Agarwal A, Dhar S, et al. Single-incision sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. a 2-year comparative analysis of 600 patients. Obes Surg. 2015;25(4):607–14.
Morales-Conde S, Del Agua IA, Moreno AB, et al. Postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopic versus single-port sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(4):608–13.
Muir KB, Rice WV. Weight-loss outcomes of SPIDER((R)) sleeve gastrectomy at 6 months compared to traditional laparoscopic technique. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(5):2043–8.
Nguyen NT, Smith BR, Reavis KM, et al. Strategic laparoscopic surgery for improved cosmesis in general and bariatric surgery: analysis of initial 127 cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012;22(4):355–61.
Park K, Afthinos JN, Lee D, et al. Single port sleeve gastrectomy: strategic use of technology to re-establish fundamental tenets of multiport laparoscopy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(4):450–7.
Porta A, Aiolfi A, Musolino C, et al. Prospective comparison and quality of life for single-incision and conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in a series of morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2017;27(3):681–7.
Rogula T, Daigle C, Dua M, et al. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery can be performed through a single incision: a comparative study. Obes Surg. 2014;24(7):1102–8.
Saber AA, El-Ghazaly TH, Dewoolkar AV, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: technical considerations and strategic modifications. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(6):658–64.
Sucher R, Resch T, Mohr E, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: analysis of 80 cases in a single center. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24(2):83–8.
Zhu JF. Which term is better: SILS, SPA, LESS, E-NOTES, or TUES? Surg Endosc. 2009;23(5):1164–5.
Ponsky JL, Rosen MJ, Poulose BK. NOTES: of caution. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(7):1561–2.
Moreno-Sanz C, Morandeira-Rivas A, Sedano-Vizcaino C, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:248–58.
Saber AA, Meslemani AM, Davis R, et al. Safety zones for anterior abdominal wall entry during laparoscopy: a CT scan mapping of epigastric vessels. Ann Surg. 2004;239:182.
Zacharoulis D, Sioka E, Papamargaritis D, et al. Influence of the learning curve on safety and efficiency of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2012;22(3):411–5.
Pourcher G, Di Giuro G, Lafosse T, et al. Routine single-port sleeve gastrectomy: a study of 60 consecutive patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(3):385–9.
Pourcher G, De Filippo G, Ferretti S, et al. Short-term results of single-port sleeve gastrectomy in adolescents with severe obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(1):65–9.
Farias C, Fernandez JI, Ovalle C, et al. Transumbilical sleeve gastrectomy with an accessory lateral port: surgical results in 237 patients and 1-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2013;23(3):325–31.
Maluenda F, Leon J, Csendes A, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: initial experience in 20 patients and 2-year follow-up. Eur Surg. 2014;46:32–7.
Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN, et al. Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2011;202(3):254–8.
O'Hara DA, Fragen RJ, Kinzer M, et al. Ketorolac tromethamine as compared with morphine sulfate for treatment of postoperative pain. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1987;41(5):556–61.
Gordon DB, Stevenson KK, Griffie J, et al. Opioid equianalgesic calculations. J Palliat Med. 1999;2(2):209–18.
Gaillard M, Tranchart H, Lainas P, et al. Single-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a routine procedure in 1000 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(7):1270–7.
Fernandez JI, Farias CO, Ovalle CL, et al. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2015;25(3):430–5.
O'Kane M, Parretti HM, Hughes CA, et al. Guidelines for the follow-up of patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Clin Obes. 2016;6(3):210–24.
Clinical Issues Committee of the American Society for M, Bariatric S. Updated position statement on sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(1):1–5.
This work was supported by research grants from the Startup Fund for Scientific Research of Fujian Medical University (2018QH1068).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
This article does not contain any studies involving human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Statement Informed Consent
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, S., Wu, P., Zhou, J. et al. Comparison of Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: a Meta-Analysis. OBES SURG (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04437-z
- Morbid obesity
- Single-incision sleeve gastrectomy
- Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
- Sleeve gastrectomy