Learning Curves of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Introduction of a Standardization
The most commonly performed bariatric procedures are laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Impact of learning curves on operative outcome has been well shown, but the necessary learning curves have not been clearly defined. This study provides a systematic review of the literature and proposes a standardization of phases of learning curves for RYGB and LSG.
A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases. All studies specifying a number or range of approaches to characterize the learning curve for RYGB and LSG were selected.
A total of 28 publications related to learning curves for 27,770 performed bariatric surgeries were included. Parameters used to determine the learning curve were operative time, complications, conversions, length of stay, and blood loss. Learning curve range was 30–500 (RYGB) and 30–200 operations (LSG) according to different definitions and respective phases of learning curves. Learning phases described the number of procedures necessary to achieve predefined skill levels, such as competency, proficiency, and mastery.
Definitions of learning curves for bariatric surgery are heterogeneous. Introduction of the three skill phases competency, proficiency, and mastery is proposed to provide a standardized definition using multiple outcome variables to enable better comparison in the future. These levels are reached after 30–70, 70–150, and up to 500 RYGB, and after 30–50, 60–100, and 100–200 LSG. Training curricula, previous laparoscopic experience, and high procedure volume are hallmarks for successful outcomes during the learning curve.
KeywordsLearning curve Obesity surgery Laparoscopy Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Sleeve gastrectomy Competency Proficiency Mastery
American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery
Body mass index
Cumulative sum analysis
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders
Length of hospital stay
We would like to thank Carly Rae Garrow for the linguistic revision of the manuscript.
Sources of Funding
The current study was supported by Stiftung Oskar-Helene-Heim (http://www.stiftung-ohh.de/) in form of the Oskar Medizin-Preis that was awarded to F.N.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Ethical Approval and Informed Consent
For this type of study, formal consent and ethical approval is not required.
- 1.WHO. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:i-xii, 1-253.Google Scholar
- 2.World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight 2018. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/.
- 3.Billeter AT, Senft J, Gotthardt D, et al. Combined Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Sleeve Gastrectomy or Gastric Bypass?—a Controlled Matched Pair Study of 34 Patients. Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1867–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-2006-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Müller-Stich BP, Fischer L, Kenngott HG, et al. Gastric Bypass Leads to Improvement of Diabetic Neuropathy Independent of Glucose Normalization—Results of a Prospective Cohort Study (DiaSurg 1 Study). Ann Surg. 2013;258(5):760–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a618b2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Nickel F, Schmidt L, Bruckner T, et al. Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Improves Significantly After Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass—a Prospective Cross-Sectional Study Within a 2-Year Follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1292–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2464-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Puzziferri N, Austrheim-Smith IT, Wolfe BM, et al. Three-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastric Bypass. Ann Surg. 2006;243(2):181–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000197381.01214.76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 25.Harrysson IJ, Cook J, Sirimanna P, et al. Systematic Review of Learning Curves for Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgery A Review of the Methodology of Data Collection, Depiction of Outcomes, and Statistical Analysis. Ann Surg. 2014;260(1):37–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/Sla.0000000000000596.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.De JLG, Schmidt M, Kowalewski K, et al. Does rating with a checklist improve the effect of E-learning for cognitive and practical skills in bariatric surgery? A rater-blinded, randomized-controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2018;Google Scholar
- 33.Higgins J. Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1. 0. The Cochrane Collaboration. Confidence intervals. 2011.Google Scholar
- 35.Wells G. The Newcaastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analysis. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm. 2013.
- 36.Abu-Hilal M, Vanden Bossche M, Bailey IS, et al. A two-consultant approach is a safe and efficient strategy to adopt during the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: Our results in the first 100 procedures. Obes Surg. 2007;17(6):742–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9137-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 53.van Rijswijk AS, Moes DE, Geubbels N, et al. Can a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass be safely performed by surgical residents in a bariatric center-of-excellence? The learning curve of surgical residents in bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(2):1012–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5779-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 55.Major P, Wysocki M, Dworak J, et al. Analysis of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Learning Curve and Its Influence on Procedure Safety and Perioperative Complications. Obes Surg. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-3075-x.
- 57.Sanchez-Santos R, Corcelles Codina R, Vilallonga Puy R, et al. Prognostic Factors for Morbimortality in Sleeve Gastrectomy. The Importance of the Learning Curve. A Spanish-Portuguese Multicenter Study. Obes Surg. 2016;26(12):2829–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2229-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 63.Hirst A, Agha RA, Rosin D, et al. How can we improve surgical research and innovation?: the IDEAL framework for action. Int J Surg (Lond, Engl). 2013;11(10)Google Scholar
- 69.Wise J. Sleeve gastrectomy matches gastric bypass in terms of weight loss and health benefits: British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 2018.Google Scholar
- 72.Pena A. The Dreyfus model of clinical problem-solving skills acquisition: a critical perspective. Med Educ Online. 2010;15 https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v15i0.4846.
- 78.Poelemeijer YQ, Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Wouters MW, Nienhuijs SW, Liem RS. Textbook Outcome: an Ordered Composite Measure for Quality of Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg. 2018:1-8.Google Scholar
- 83.Ballantyne GH, Ewing D, Capella RF, et al. The learning curve measured by operating times for laparoscopic and open gastric bypass: Roles of surgeon's experience, institutional experience, body mass index and fellowship training. Obes Surg. 2005;15(2):172–82. https://doi.org/10.1381/0960892053268507.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar