Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 595–602 | Cite as

The transtheoretical model (TTM) to gain insight into young women’s long-term physical activity after bariatric surgery: a qualitative study

  • Meggy HayotteEmail author
  • Véronique Nègre
  • Laura Gray
  • Jean-Louis Sadoul
  • Fabienne d’Arripe-Longueville
Original Contributions
  • 146 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Over the long term, people who have undergone bariatric surgery (BS) remain overly sedentary with inadequate physical activity (PA). The purpose of this study was to apply the transtheoretical model (TTM) to (1) explore in-depth how PA is experienced years after BS and (2) identify the barriers to and facilitators of PA involved at each stage of change (SOC).

Methods

Seventeen women with a mean age of 32.5 ± 3.3 years and a percentage of total weight loss of 29.6 ± 12.4 were interviewed at a mean of 9.4 ± 3.6 years after BS. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results

The distribution of barriers to and facilitators of PA differed with the SOC. In progressing from the precontemplation and contemplation stages to the preparation stage, the women experienced changes in their decisional balance, supported by processes of self-reevaluation and environmental reevaluation. In shifting from preparation to the action and maintenance stages, they experienced intrinsic motivation and self-liberation processes. The relapse stage was associated with a decrease in self-efficacy to cope with life constraints.

Conclusions

This study presents an in-depth theory-based exploration of the dynamics of long-term engagement in PA after BS in young women, with clinical implications for providing them with better guidance toward a more physically active lifestyle.

Keywords

Physical activity Bariatric surgery Stage of change Transtheoretical model Qualitative analysis Interviews 

Abbreviations

BS

bariatric surgery

PA

physical activity

SOC

stage of change

TTM

transtheoretical model

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the participants for their contribution to this research.

Funding Information

M.H. was supported by a PhD grant from the Région Sud Provence-Alpes Côte d’Azur, France, and co-supported by the association “Azur Sport Santé.” This work was supported by the French government, managed by the “Agence Nationale de la Recherche” as part of the UCAJEDI Future Investments project, reference number ANR-15-IDEX-01.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:741–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Petroni ML, Caletti MT, Calugi S, et al. Long-term treatment of severe obesity: are lifestyle interventions still an option? Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. 2017;12:391–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stewart F, Avenell A. Behavioural interventions for severe obesity before and/or after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26:1203–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Herring LY, Stevinson C, Davies MJ, et al. Changes in physical activity behaviour and physical function after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis: physical activity and physical function. Obes Rev. 2016;17:250–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coen PM, Carnero EA, Goodpaster BH. Exercise and bariatric surgery: an effective therapeutic strategy. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2018;46:262–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Adil MT, Jain V, Rashid F, et al. Meta-analysis of the effect of bariatric surgery on physical function: effect of bariatric surgery on physical function. Br J Surg. 2018;105:1107–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Busetto L, Dicker D, Azran C, et al. Practical recommendations of the obesity management task force of the european association for the study of obesity for the post-bariatric surgery medical management. Obes Facts. 2017;10:597–632.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tettero OM, Aronson T, Wolf RJ, et al. Increase in physical activity after bariatric surgery demonstrates improvement in weight loss and cardiorespiratory fitness. Obes Surg. 2018;28:3950–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    King WC, Hsu JY, Belle SH, et al. Pre- to postoperative changes in physical activity: report from the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery-2 (LABS-2). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:522–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reid RER, Carver TE, Andersen KM, et al. Physical activity and sedentary behavior in bariatric patients long-term post-surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1073–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    King WC, Chen J-Y, Bond DS, et al. Objective assessment of changes in physical activity and sedentary behavior: pre- through 3 years post-bariatric surgery: presurgery to Postsurgery Changes in Physical Activity. Obes Open Access. 2015;23:1143–50.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, et al. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e1077–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Althoff T, Sosič R, Hicks JL, et al. Large-scale physical activity data reveal worldwide activity inequality. Nature. 2017;547:336.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baruth M, Sharpe PA, Hutto B, et al. Patterns of sedentary behavior in overweight and obese women. Ethn Dis. 2013;23:336–42.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Himpens J, Ramos A, Welbourn R, Dixon J, Kinsman R, Walton P. Fourth IFSO global registry report 2018. IFSO & Dendrite Clinical Systems; 2018.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zabatiero J, Smith A, Hill K, et al. Do factors related to participation in physical activity change following restrictive bariatric surgery? A qualitative study. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2018;12:307–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dikareva A, Harvey WJ, Cicchillitti MA, et al. Exploring perceptions of barriers, facilitators, and motivators to physical activity among female bariatric patients: implications for physical activity programming. Am J Health Promot. 2016;30:536–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boscatto EC, Duarte MDF d S, Gomes MDA. Stages of behavior change and physical activity barriers in morbid obese subjects. Rev bras cineantropom desempenho hum. 2011;13:329–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peacock JC, Sloan SS, Cripps B. A qualitative analysis of bariatric patients’ post-surgical barriers to exercise. Obes Surg. 2014;24:292–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Teixeira PJ, Marques MM. Health behavior change for obesity management. Obes Facts. 2017;10:666–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gourlan M, Bernard P, Bortolon C, et al. Efficacy of theory-based interventions to promote physical activity. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10:50–66.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51:390–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marshall SJ, Biddle SJH. The transtheoretical model of behavior change: a meta-analysis of applications to physical activity and exercise. Ann Behav Med. 2001;23:229–46.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Romain AJ, Bernard P, Attalin V, et al. Health-related quality of life and stages of behavioural change for exercise in overweight/obese individuals. Diabetes Metab. 2012;38:352–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marcus BH, Lewis BA. Physical activity and the stages of motivational readiness for change model. Pres Counc Phys Fit Sports Res Dig. 2003;4:1–8.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Waterman AD, Robbins ML, Paiva AL, et al. Kidney patients’ intention to receive a deceased donor transplant: development of stage of change, decisional balance and self-efficacy measures. J Health Psychol. 2010;15:436–45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kirk A, MacMillan F, Webster N. Application of the transtheoretical model to physical activity in older adults with type 2 diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2010;11:320–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mastellos N, Gunn LH, Felix LM, Car J, Majeed A. Transtheoretical model stages of change for dietary and physical exercise modification in weight loss management for overweight and obese adults. Cochrane Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Romain AJ, Bernard P, Hokayem M, et al. Measuring the processes of change from the transtheoretical model for physical activity and exercise in overweight and obese adults. Am J Health Promot. 2016;30:272–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jehl A, Hayotte M, Gugenheim J, et al. Bariatric surgery for subjects under 25 years old: retrospective medico-socio-psychological study. Ann Endocrinol. 2016;77:327–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Baecke JA, Burema J, Frijters JE. A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982;36:936–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bigard AX, Duforez F, Portero P, et al. Determination of physical activity by questionnaire: validation of Baecke’s self-administered questionnaire. Sci Sport. 1992;7:215–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tehard B, Saris WHM, Astrup A, et al. Comparison of two physical activity questionnaires in obese subjects: the NUGENOB study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:1535–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Genève: WHO; 2010.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Marcus BH, Selby VC, Niaura RS, et al. Self-efficacy and the stages of exercise behavior change. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992;63:60–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cardinal BJ. Construct validity of stages of change for exercise behavior. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12:68–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Weed M. Research quality considerations for grounded theory research in sport & exercise psychology. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2009;10:502–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Establishing trustworthiness. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1985. p. 289–327.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Smith B, McGannon KR. Developing rigor in qualitative research: problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2018;11:101–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hart EA, Leary MR, Rejeski WJ. The measurement of social physique anxiety. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1989;11:94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zabatiero J, Hill K, Gucciardi DF, et al. Beliefs, barriers and facilitators to physical activity in bariatric surgery candidates. Obes Surg. 2016;26:1097–109.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, et al. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet. 2012;380:258–71.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    DuCharme KA, Brawley LR. Predicting the intentions and behavior of exercise initiates using two forms of self-efficacy. J Behav Med. 1995;18:479–97.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sherwood NE, Jeffery RW. The behavioral determinants of exercise: implications for physical activity interventions. Annu Rev Nutr. 2000;20:21–44.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Engberg E, Alen M, Kukkonen-Harjula K, et al. Life events and change in leisure time physical activity: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2012;42:433–47.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Romain AJ, Horwath C, Bernard P. Prediction of physical activity level using processes of change from the transtheoretical model: experiential, behavioral, or an interaction effect? Am J Health Promot. 2018;32:16–23.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Romain AJ, Chevance G, Caudroit J, et al. The transtheoretical model: description, interests and application in the motivation to physical activity among population with overweight and obesity. Obésité. 2016;11:47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bellicha A, Ciangura C, Poitou C, et al. Effectiveness of exercise training after bariatric surgery—a systematic literature review and meta-analysis: exercise training and bariatric surgery. Obes Rev. 2018;19:1544–56.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pouwels S, Wit M, Teijink JAW, et al. Aspects of exercise before or after bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Facts. 2015;8:132–46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Butryn ML, Arigo D, Raggio GA, et al. Enhancing physical activity promotion in midlife women with technology-based self-monitoring and social connectivity: A pilot study. J Health Psychol. 2016;21:1548–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cotie LM, Prince SA, Elliott CG, et al. The effectiveness of eHealth interventions on physical activity and measures of obesity among working-age women: a systematic review and meta-analysis: eHealth physical activity interventions in women. Obes Rev. 2018;19:1340–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Côte d’Azur, LAMHESSNiceFrance
  2. 2.Centre Spécialisé Obésité PACA Est, Pôle DARECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice membre de l’Université Côte d’AzurNiceFrance

Personalised recommendations