Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 296–303 | Cite as

Comparative Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding vs Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Adolescents—a National Registry-Based Study

  • Orit BlumenfeldEmail author
  • Nahum Beglaibter
  • Nissim Geron
  • Rita Dichtiar
  • David Hazzan
  • Lital Keinan-Boker
  • David Goitein
Original Contributions
  • 111 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

Most published work on bariatric surgery (BS) in adolescents describes outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. We compared the efficacy of LAGB and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in adolescents.

Methods

A National Bariatric Registry was queried for adolescents who underwent BS between June 2013 and December 2015. We collected data on weight and height at baseline and 1-year following surgery, subsequent hospitalizations, interventions, and mortality, which were compared at 30 days post-surgery and until last follow-up (maximum 4.2 years post-surgery). Mortality and hospitalization data were extracted from national databases.

Results

Two hundred fifty-nine adolescents (60% females) aged 12–19 years were included. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 17.5 ± 1.2 years and 45.1 ± 5.0 kg/m2, respectively. LSG (n = 227, 87.6%) and LAGB (n = 32, 12.4%) were the most common procedures performed. LSG group achieved greater average at 1 year BMI loss compared to LAGB group (15.4 ± 4.7 kg/m2 vs. 10.3 ± 5.1 kg/m2 respectively; p = 0.0001) and higher rate with BMI < 30 kg/m2 1 year post-surgery (57.7% (n = 131) vs. 25% (n = 8), respectively; p = 0.0005). Males who underwent LSG reduced BMI more than their female counterparts (p = 0.0001), LSG was the strongest independent predictor for BMI < 30 after 1 year (OR = 4.1; 95% CI 1.7–9.9) followed by age (OR = 1.3; 95% CI1.0–1.6). No mortality was observed. Postoperative hospitalizations between the two groups did not differ (hazard ratio 2.4; 95% CI 0.7–7.9; p = 0.1).

Conclusion

Compared to LAGB, LSG is superior regarding weight loss with a similar risk of short- and long-term hospitalizations, complications, and interventional procedures. Males lose more weight following LSG.

Keywords

Weight loss Bariatric surgery Adolescents Follow-up Registry Survival Complications 

Abbreviations

LABG

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

BMI

Body mass index

SAGB

Single anastomosis gastric bypass

HMO

Health maintenance organizations

LRYGB

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

LSG

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

HEMR

Hospital electronic medical records

Notes

Acknowledgments

We want to thank Mrs. Carmel Sherf for assistance in collecting the data. The authors thank the bariatric surgery department’s staff from all medical centers in Israel for their cooperation.

Author Contributions

O.B initiated the study, collected the data, had complete access to the study data, interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. B.N revised the final version of the manuscript, D.R had complete access to the study data and performed the statistical analysis. H.D and KBL revised the final version of the manuscript and G.D assisted in interpretation of data and in drafting the paper.

Funding information

The study did not receive any grant support. This study was conducted as part of the responsibilities of the Israel MOH to collect data on adolescents undergoing bariatric surgery. The funding was available as part of the annual budget of the Israel Center for Disease Control.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This study was approved by the ethical review board at the Sheba Medical Center (the ICDC resides in this campus) (approval # 3857-17-SMC). This study was conducted as part of the responsibilities of the Israel Ministry of Health to collect data on adolescences who underwent bariatric surgery. This research was based on these data. The Ministry of Health is able to collect data by virtue of the provision of section 29A and the Public Health ordinance 1940.

https://www.health.gov.il/LegislationLibrary/Sherutei03.pdf

Consent for Publication

The ethical review board waived the need for consent.

Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Shoar S, Naderan M, Bagheri-Hariri S, et al. Long-term outcome of bariatric surgery in morbidly obese adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 950 patients with a minimum of 3 years follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27(12):3110–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Lawman HG, et al. Trends in obesity prevalence among children and adolescents in the United States, 1988–1994 Through 2013–2014. JAMA. 2016;315(21):2292–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mabat Youth, second national health and nutrition survey of 7th-12th grade students 2015-2016, Israel Center for Disease Control, Ministry of Health, 373, August 2017. https://www.health.gov.il/PublicationsFiles/mabat_youth_2015_2016_Full.pdf.
  4. 4.
    Bairdain S, Samnaliev M. Cost-effectiveness of adolescent bariatric surgery. Cureus. 2015;7(2):e248.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fontaine KR, Redden DT, Wang C, et al. Years of life lost due to obesity. JAMA. 2003;289(2):187–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tirosh A, Shai I, Afek A, et al. Adolescent BMI trajectory and risk of diabetes versus coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(14):1315–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alqahtani AR, Antonisamy B, Alamri H, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in 108 obese children and adolescents aged 5 to 21 years. Ann Surg. 2012;256(2):266–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bondada S, Jen HC, Deugarte DA. Outcomes of bariatric surgery in adolescents. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2011;23(5):552–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Al-Sabah SK, Almazeedi SM, Dashti SA, et al. The efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in treating adolescent obesity. Obes Surg. 2015;25(1):50–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Castellani RL, Toppino M, Favretti F, et al. National survey for bariatric procedures in adolescent: long time follow-up. J Pediatr Surg. 2017;52(10):1602–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Olbers T, Gronowitz E, Werling M, et al. Two-year outcome of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in adolescents with severe obesity: results from a Swedish Nationwide Study (AMOS). Int J Obes. 2012;36(11):1388–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Fried M, Yumuk V, Oppert JM, et al. Interdisciplinary European guidelines on metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Facts. 2013;6(5):449–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Blüher S, Raschpichler M, Hirsch W, et al. A case report and review of the literature of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese adolescents: beyond metabolic surgery and visceral fat reduction. Metabolism. 2013;62(6):761–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Raziel A, Sakran N, Szold A, et al. Mid-term follow-up after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in obese adolescents. Isr Med Assoc J. 2014;16(1):37–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ells LJ, Mead E, Atkinson G, et al. Surgery for the treatment of obesity in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(6):CD011740.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011740.
  17. 17.
    Holterman AX, Holterman M, Browne A, et al. Patterns of surgical weight loss and resolution of metabolic abnormalities in superobese bariatric adolescents. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(9):1633–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khen-Dunlop N, Dabbas M, De Filippo G, et al. Primordial influence of post-operative compliance on weight loss after adolescent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2016;26(1):98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schmitt F, Riquin E, Beaumesnil M, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in adolescents: results at two years including psychosocial aspects. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51(3):403–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Silva GM, Osório A, Pereira F, et al. Effect of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding on modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in extremely obese adolescents. Obes Surg. 2012;22(6):991–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nocca D, Nedelcu M, Nedelcu A, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for late adolescent population. Obes Surg. 2014;24(6):861–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lennerz BS, Wabitsch M, Lippert H, et al. Bariatric surgery in adolescents and young adults--safety and effectiveness in a cohort of 345 patients. Int J Obes. 2014;38(3):334–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sebastianelli L, Benois M, Vanbiervliet G, et al. Systematic endoscopy 5 years after sleeve gastrectomy results in a high rate of Barrett’s esophagus: results of a multicenter study. Obes Surg. 2019;29(5):1462–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Altieri MS, Yang J, Nie L, et al. Incidence of cholecystectomy after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(7):992–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Israel Center for Disease ControlMinistry of Health, Chaim Sheba Medical CenterRamat GanIsrael
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryHadassah Har Hazofim Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryPoria Medical CenterTiberiusIsrael
  4. 4.Department of Surgery CChaim Sheba Medical CenterRamat GanIsrael
  5. 5.Sackler School of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  6. 6.School of Public HealthUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations