Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 29, Issue 11, pp 3749–3753 | Cite as

Efficacy and Safety of Novel, Disposable Endoscopic Scissors in Patients with Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Single-Center Feasibility Study

  • Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi
  • Thomas R. McCarty
  • Lolwa N. Al-Obaid
  • Matthew J. Skinner
  • Christopher C. ThompsonEmail author
New Concept

Abstract

Background

Retained suture material from primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or revisions may result in local inflammation, ulcer formation, and abdominal pain. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of novel, disposable endoscopic scissors for suture removal.

Methods

This was a single-center, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from December 2016 to January 2019. Patients with history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and upper endoscopy utilizing this novel, disposable endoscopic scissors device were reviewed. Measured outcomes included endoscopy indication, technical success (as determined by ability to achieve adequate cut and suture removal), improvement in abdominal pain if present prior to procedure, and adverse events.

Results

Sixty-two patients were included in this analysis. Mean age was 54.69 ± 9.40 years. Eighty-eight percent of patients were female. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass occurred on average 142.43 ± 62.33 months prior to suture removal. Primary indications for endoscopy were evaluation of gastric pouch and gastrojejunal anastomosis for weight regain (37.10%) and abdominal pain (30.65%). Overall, technical success of these novel endoscopic scissors was 100% with a mean procedure duration of 23.00 ± 9.50 min. Symptom improvement post-suture removal occurred in approximately half of the patients (48.65%). Post-procedure bleeding was self-limited and occurred in 2 patients (3.23%). Two patients developed transient post-procedure abdominal pain.

Conclusions

Novel, disposable endoscopic scissors appear to be highly effective and safe for removal of suture material with high technical success and minimal adverse events.

Keywords

Obesity Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Endoscopy Endoscopic scissors 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Christopher C. Thompson is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Olympus America, and Apollo Endosurgery. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization (WHO). Obesity and overweight. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. Published: February 16th 2018. Accessed 2 April 2019.
  2. 2.
    Hales CM, Fryar CD, Carroll MD, et al. Trends in obesity and severe obesity prevalence in US youth and adults by sex and age, 2007-2008 to 2015-2016. JAMA. 2018;319:1723–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khan S, Rock K, Baskara A, et al. Trends in bariatric surgery from 2008 to 2012. Am J Surg. 2016;211:1041–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khorgami Z, Shoar S, Andalib A, et al. Trends in utilization of bariatric surgery, 2010-2014: sleeve gastrectomy dominates. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:774–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McCarty TR, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Lange A, et al. Impact of bariatric surgery on outcomes of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a nationwide inpatient sample analysis, 2004-2012. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jirapinyo P, Thompson CC. Endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies: surgical analogues and mechanisms of action. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15:619–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Encinosa WE, Bernard DM, Du D, et al. Recent improvements in bariatric surgery outcomes. Med Care. 2009;47:531–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flum DR, Belle SH, King WC, et al. Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:445–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ma IT, Madura 2nd JA. Gastrointestinal complications after bariatric surgery. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2015;11:526–35.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schulman AR, Thompson CC. Abdominal pain in the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patient. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:161–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dallal RM, Bailey LA. Ulcer disease after gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2:455–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huang CS, Forse RA, Jacobson BC, et al. Endoscopic findings and their clinical correlations in patients with symptoms after gastric bypass surgery. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:859–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ryou M, Mogabgab O, Lautz DB, et al. Endoscopic foreign body removal for treatment of chronic abdominal pain in patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:526–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frezza EE, Herbert H, Ford R, et al. Endoscopic suture removal at gastrojejunal anastomosis after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to prevent marginal ulceration. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:619–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pratt JS, Van Noord M, Christison-Lagay E. The tethered bezoar as a delayed complication of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a case report. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:690–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ge PS, Thompson CC, Aihara H. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a large cecal polyp using a scissor-type knife: implications for training in ESD. VideoGIE. 2018;3:313–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oka S, Tanaka S, Takata S, et al. Usefulness and safety of SB knife Jr in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc. 2012;24(Suppl 1):90–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yamashina T, Takeuchi Y, Nagai K, et al. Scissor-type knife significantly improves self-completion rate of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: single-center prospective randomized trial. Dig Endosc. 2017;29:322–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Evans JA, Williams NN, Chan EP, et al. Endoscopic removal of eroded bands in vertical banded gastroplasty: a novel use of endoscopic scissors (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:801–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shehab H, Gawdat K. Endoscopic management of eroded bands following banded-gastric bypass (with video). Obes Surg. 2017;27:1804–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spann MD, Aher CV, English WJ, et al. Endoscopic management of erosion after banded bariatric procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:1875–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and EndoscopyBrigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Internal MedicineLahey Hospital and Medical CenterBurlingtonUSA
  3. 3.Division of GastroenterologyNYU Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations