Advertisement

Commentary to “Efficacy of Endoscopic Interventions for the management of obesity: A meta-analysis to compare Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty, AspireAssist and Primary Obesity Surgery Endolumenal”

  • Zvi H. PerryEmail author
Letter to the Editor
  • 37 Downloads

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent Statement

Does not apply.

References

  1. 1.
    Sullivan S, Edmundowicz SA, Thompson CC. Endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies: new and emerging technologies. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(7):1791–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar N. Weight loss endoscopy: development, applications, and current status. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(31):7069–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ward ZJ, Long MW, Resch SC, et al. Redrawing the US obesity landscape: bias-corrected estimates of state-specific adult obesity prevalence. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0150735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harris JD, Brand JC, Cote MP, et al. Research pearls: the significance of statistics and perils of pooling. Part 3: pearls and pitfalls of meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(8):1594–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lang A, Edwards N. Perils of systematic reviews. CMAJ. 2005;172(7):855. author reply 855-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Surgical Ward A, Soroka University Medical Center and The Public health departmentBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeershebaIsrael
  2. 2.Steinberg Centre for Simulation and Interactive Learning, Surgical divisionMcGill University HospitalsMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations