First Successful Large-Scale Introduction of an Enhanced Recovery after Bariatric Surgery (ERABS) Program in the Middle East: The Results and Lessons Learned of Tawam Hospital/Johns Hopkins, a Tertiary Governmental Center in the UAE
- 161 Downloads
Although enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery (ERABS) has proven to be safe and cost-effective, this concept is relatively new in the Middle East.
A retrospective analysis of consecutive registered cohorts of patients who underwent primary and purely laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) were compared before introduction of ERABS (2010–2014) and after ERABS (2015–2017) at Tawam Hospital/Johns Hopkins, the UAE.
A total of 462 eligible bariatric patients (LSG 414 and LRYGB 48) were operated on before and 1602 (LSG 1436 and LRYGB 166) after introduction of the ERABS. Significant improvements of mean patient time of the patient being within the OR for LSG (from 2:27 to 1:23 min, p = 0.000) and LRYGB (from 3:17 to 1:59 min, p = 0.000) were achieved when comparing pre-ERABS with after introduction of ERABS. Furthermore, there was a significant decrease in LOS in both LSG (from 3.2 to 1.5 days, p = 0.000) and in LRYGB (from 3.5 to 1.7 days, p = 0.000). Major (CD classification III–IV) complications decreased significantly in LSG (from 13.8 to 0.8%, p = 0.000) and were similar in LRYGB (from 4.2% to 3.0%, p = NS). The readmission rate for LSG (from 2.9 to 2.6%, p = NS) or LRYGB (from 0 to 4.8%, p = NS) and the reoperation rates after LSG (from 0.7 to 0.5%, p = NS) and LRYGB (from 0 to 2.4%, p = NS) did not differ between both groups following introduction of ERABS.
Implementation of a standardized ERABS program in the Middle East is feasible and safe and leads to reduced LOS and OR times.
KeywordsFast-track ERAS ERABS Bariatric surgery Enhanced recovery Enhanced recovery after surgery Laparoscopic Sleeve gastrectomy Gastric bypass Cost-efficiency Lessons Obesity
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the scientific board of Tawam Hospital/Johns Hopkins, Al Ain, The United Arab Emirates (AAMDHREC Protocol No. 527-17).
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 19.Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systemic analysis for the Global Burden Disease Study. Lancet 2013. 2013;384:766–81.Google Scholar
- 26.Loots E, Sartorius B, Paruk IM, et al. The successful implementation of a modified enhanced recovery after surgery program for bariatric surgery in a South African teaching hospital. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018;28:26–9.Google Scholar
- 30.Stepaniak PS, Heij C, Mannaerts GH, et al. Modeling procedure and surgical times for current procedural terminology–anesthesia–surgeon combinations and evaluations in terms of case duration prediction and operating room efficiency: a multicenter study. Anesth Analg. 2012;109:1232–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar