Limb Length in Gastric Bypass in Super-Obese Patients—Importance of Length of Total Alimentary Small Bowel Tract
- 307 Downloads
In super-obese patients, rates of weight loss failure and weight regain are high after RYGB. In order to improve weight loss, lengthening of the biliopancreatic limb is vital. In this study, efficacy and safety of two types of RYGB with 2-m BP-limb were assessed in improving weight loss and in the resolution of comorbidities compared with standard RYGB in a long-term follow-up.
This is a retrospective cohort analysis on 671 super-obese patients operated in a 10-year period. Patients were classified into three groups: (1) 155 patients; roux limb 150 cm, BP-limb 60 cm; (2) 230 patients; roux limb 60 cm, BP-limb 200 cm; and (3) 286 patients; roux limb 150 cm, BP-limb 200 cm. EWL, TWL, BMI, failure, weight regain, comorbidity resolution, nutritional status, and complications were assessed.
Total alimentary limb length was shortened with 60 cm in group 1 and with 200 cm in groups 2 and 3. EWL, BMI change, and TWL were higher in the 2-m BP-limb groups vs group 1. No differences in complication rates were found, except higher frequency of marginal ulcers in patients with a shorter roux limb. EWL failure was higher in group 1 (10.3%) vs the other groups (4.3%; 5.2%). Group 3 had significantly less weight regain (26.6%). Remission of comorbidities was higher in the 2-m BP-limb groups at expense of nutritional and vitamin deficiencies (3.9%; 5.9%). No difference in hypoalbuminemia was noted.
Lengthening of the BP-limb gives significantly higher weight loss, lower rate of EWL failure, and lesser weight regain along with better resolution of obesity-associated comorbidities.
KeywordsGastric bypass RYGB Limb length Super-obese Biliopancreatic Total alimentary small bowel tract
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The authors have no commercial or financial associations that might be of conflict of interest in relation to this article.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 3.Mason EE, Doherty C, Maher JW, et al. Super obesity and gastric reduction procedures. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 1987;16(3):495–502.Google Scholar
- 7.Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, et al. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8:CD003641.Google Scholar
- 23.Gislason H, Jacobsen HJ, Bergland A, et al. Fast-track in bariatric surgery: safety, quality, teaching aspects, logistics and cost-efficacy in 8,000 consecutive cases. Minimally Invasive Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery. 2015;119–129.Google Scholar
- 24.O'Brien PE, Hindle A, Brennan L, et al. Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight loss at 10 or more years for all bariatric procedures and a single-centre review of 20-year outcomes after adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2019;3–14.Google Scholar
- 35.Muir A, Hopfer U. Regional specificity of iron uptake by small intestinal brush-border membranes from normal and iron-deficient mice. Am J Phys. 1985;248(3 Pt 1):G376–9.Google Scholar
- 37.Stroh C, Benedix F, Meyer F, et al. Nutrient deficiencies after bariatric surgery - systematic literature review and suggestions for diagnostics and treatment. Zentralbl Chir. 2015;140(4):407–16.Google Scholar