Photo-Assisted Dietary Method Improves Estimates of Dietary Intake Among People with Sleeve Gastrectomy
Bariatric operations are effective obesity treatments because of the significant reductions in food intake after surgery, but weight regain remains a problem in a small group of patients after surgery. Estimating food intake is difficult due to dieting status, weight, gender, and challenges with estimating portion size. We aimed to evaluate the use of digital food photography in comparison to conventional methods among patients after sleeve gastrectomy.
Participants used a mobile device (mHealth) to photo-document their dietary intake of all food and beverages consumed before and after eating. They also completed a 24 h food recall interview with a dietician.
Data from 383 eating occasions were analyzed. Food intake using 24 h recall was reported as 972.5 ± 77 kcal and estimates from photographs were 802.9 ± 63.4 kcal, with a difference of 169.6 ± 451.4 kcal (95% confidence interval (CI) of 41.4 to 297.9 kcal, p = 0.005). There was no difference for protein intake, but carbohydrate intake reported during the 24 h recall was 541.2 ± 298 kcal and estimates from photographs were 395.2 ± 219.6 kcal, with a difference of 145.8 ± 256.3 kcal (95% CI of 73.2 to 218.8 kcal, p = 0.0001).
After sleeve gastrectomy, patients reported eating more total calories and calories from carbohydrates compared to estimations using photographs. The implication for patients are that tools such as mHealth might be useful to optimize food intake and calories after sleeve gastrectomy, especially for those patients that may struggle with weight regain after surgery.
KeywordsObesity surgery Food photography mHealth Nutrition
We would like to thank all the participants for giving up their time to participate in this study. The authors gratefully acknowledge the clinical service unit at Dasman Diabetes Institute and the Ministory of Health Kuwait.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Professor Carel Le Roux received grants from Johnson and Johnson and AnaBio. Also speaker fees from Eli Lilly, Johnson and Johnson, Sanofi Aventis, Astra Zeneca, Janssen, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, p Boehringer-Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. He is on the advisory board of NovoNordisk and GI dynamics. Professor le Roux has nothing to disclose related to this manuscript. All the other authors declare no conflict of interest
- 1.WHO, W.h.O. Obesity and overweight. 2017 [cited 2018 April 29]; Available from: http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight.
- 2.OECD. Obesity Update 2017. 2017;1-14. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/els/healthsystems/Obesity-Update-2017.pdf. Accessed 29 April 2018.
- 3.Colquitt JL et al. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(8):1–244.Google Scholar
- 4.Picot J, Jones J, Colquitt JL, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(41):1–190.Google Scholar
- 11.Dahl Lassen A et al. Evaluation of a digital method to assess evening meal intake in a free-living adult population. Food Nutr Res. 2010;54:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v54i0.5311.
- 20.USDA. USDA food composition database. 2018 [cited 2018; available from: https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/search/list.
- 26.Pannemans DL, Westerterp K. Estimation of energy intake to feed subjects at energy balance as verified with doubly labelled water: a study in the elderly. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1993;47:490–6.Google Scholar
- 29.Westerterp KR, V.-v.d. V.W., Meijer GAL, Hoor ten F., Self-reported intake as a measure for energy intake. A validation against doubly labelled water. Obes Eur 1991; 91:17–22.Google Scholar
- 30.Freedman, L., et al., Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake. Vol. 180. 2014.Google Scholar
- 31.Wehling H, Lusher J. People with a body mass index ≥ 30 under-report their dietary intake: a systematic review. J Health Psychol. 2017:1359105317714318.Google Scholar
- 32.Blake AJ, Guthrie HA, Smiciklas-Wright H. Accuracy of food portion estimation by overweight and normal-weight subjects. J Am Diet Assoc. 1989;89:962–4.Google Scholar
- 35.Rosenbaum M et al. Leptin reverses weight loss–induced changes in regional neural activity responses to visual food stimuli. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(7):2583–91.Google Scholar
- 40.Williamson DA, et al. Digital photography: a new method for estimating food intake in cafeteria settings. Eat Weight Disord. 2004;9:24–8.Google Scholar