Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 1434–1435 | Cite as

Robot-Assisted Revisional Surgery of Gastric Greater Curvature Plication to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

  • Gabriela Aguiluz CornejoEmail author
  • Natalia Jelen
  • Antonio Gangemi
Video Submission
  • 75 Downloads

Abstract

Laparoscopic gastric greater curvature plication (LGGCP) has been presented as an alternative to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for reversible reduction of stomach capacity without gastric reduction or stapling. We present a case of a 51-year-old Hispanic female with a BMI of 41.91 kg/m2, who underwent (LGGCP) 5 years previously at another institution. Despite multiple interventions, the patient was unable to successfully lose weight, and the decision was made to reverse the procedure with a robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The plication was intact extending from the fundus to the antrum, with the sutures incorporated by scarring and fibrotic tissue. Sutures were delicately removed to form a 30-cc pouch, followed by jejuno-jejunal and gastrojejunal anastomosis. The patient tolerated the surgery well and control fluoroscopy was negative for anastomotic leaks, patient was discharged home on POD 2. At the 40-day follow-up, the patient had lost 22 lb., reducing her BMI to 37.64 kg/m2. The 3D vision of the robotic camera and the six degrees of freedom of the robotic instruments seemed to facilitate the challenging dissection of the embedded sutures used for the LGGCP and its overall undoing. However, further volume and data on the robotic approach for this specific revisional procedure are necessary before drawing any definitive conclusions.

Keywords

Revisional surgery Laparoscopic gastric greater curvature plication Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Robot-assisted surgery Bariatric surgery 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

Video 1

(MP4 246 mb)

References

  1. 1.
    Skrekas G, Antiochos K, Stafyla VK. Laparoscopic gastric greater curvature plication: results and complications in a series of 135 patients. Obes Surg. 2011;21(11):1657–63.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0499-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chouillard E, Schoucair N, Alsabah S, et al. Laparoscopic gastric plication (LGP) as an alternative to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in patients with morbid obesity: a preliminary, short-term, Case-Control Study. Obes Surg. 2016;26(6):1167–72.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1913-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grubnik VV, Ospanov OB, Namaeva KA, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic greater curvature plication versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(6):2186–91.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4373-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zerrweck C, Rodriguez JG, Aramburo E, et al. Revisional surgery following laparoscopic gastric plication. Obes Surg. 2017;27(1):38–43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2242-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Atlas H, Yazbek T, Garneau PY, et al. Is there a future for laparoscopic gastric greater curvature plication (LGGCP)? A review of 44 patients. Obes Surg. 2013;23(9):1397–403.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-0934-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khidir N, Al Dhaheri M, El Ansari W, et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic gastric greater curvature plication in morbidly obese patients. J Obes. 2017;2017:7989714.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/798971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations