Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 579–584 | Cite as

Impact of Patient Attrition from Bariatric Surgery Practice on Clinical Outcomes

  • Julia A. JurgensenEmail author
  • Wendy Reidt
  • Todd Kellogg
  • Manpreet Mundi
  • Meera Shah
  • Maria L. Collazo Clavell
Original Contributions
  • 95 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Obesity has become a global epidemic. Bariatric surgery remains the most successful modality for producing sustained weight loss. Attrition rates after bariatric surgery are currently reported between 3 and 63% depending on the type of bariatric operation and the length of follow-up provided by the bariatric surgery team. It is currently unknown if patient attrition from bariatric surgery programs impact clinical outcomes. The availability of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) and the Mayo Clinic Midwest unified electronic medical record (EMR) provide a unique opportunity to explore this topic.

Methods

Raw data was downloaded from MBSAQIP database for all laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) cases between May 1, 2008 and January 8, 2015 (N = 1242). Baseline weight and preexisting comorbidities (type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia) were recorded using the MBSAQIP database and the EMR. Current weight and comorbidity data (type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia) were subsequently collected at the time closest to the patient’s surgical anniversary dates during the following assessment periods: years 1, 2, and 3 after surgery. Mean percentage total weight loss (TWL) was calculated at each time frame for each patient. Data was summarized using descriptive statistics, including counts and percentages for categorical variables by either year or year and location.

Results

The number of patients seen by the bariatric surgery practice (BSP) compared to those seen by other providers within our practice (attrition to bariatric surgery practice (ABSP)) was highest in year 1 and reduced each subsequent year (year 1: BSP N = 740, ABSP N = 166, year 2: BSP N = 425, ABSP N = 309, and year 3: BSP N = 235, ABSP N = 325). The mean TWL in the BSP and ABSP groups at year 1 was 31.84% versus 30.19%, at year 2 was 31.34% versus 29.67%, and at year 3 was 29.01% versus 27.71% respectively. Differences were statistically significant between groups at years 1 and 2 (p < 0.05). A statistically significant difference was not found in year 3 despite a trend towards higher TWL in the BSP group. Among all patients, statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001) were observed between baseline and years 1, 2, and 3 for type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia.

Conclusions

Our study confirms the problem of patient attrition to follow up at our BSP. It is also the first to suggest a difference in weight loss outcomes among patients seen in BSP compared to those seen by other providers (ABSP) at 1 and 2 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). The potential implications of this observation on long-term weight maintenance after LRYGB and the impact on metabolic comorbidities remain unknown but warrant further investigation. It also warrants the development of strategies to improve patient retention in BSP and/or engagement of medical providers to achieve that end.

Keywords

Bariatric surgery Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Attrition Lost to follow-up 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Mayo Clinic.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams T, Davidson L, Litwin S, et al. Weight and metabolic outcomes 12 years after gastric bypass. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1143–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    American College of Surgeons (2016). MBSAQIP Standards Manual 2.0: resources for optimal care of the metabolic and bariatric surgery patient 2016. Retrieved from https://www.facs.org/~/media/files/quality%20programs/bariatric/mbsaqip%20standardsmanual.ashx. Accessed 24 Sept 2018.
  3. 3.
    Chang S, Stoll C, Song J, et al. Bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003-2012. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(3):275–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Compher C, Hanlon A, Kang Y, et al. Attendance at clinical visits predicts weight loss after gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2012;22:927–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DeNino W, Osler T, Evans E, et al. Travel distance as factor in follow-up visit compliance in post-laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding population. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:597–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gould J, Beverstein G, Reinhardt S, et al. Impact of routine and long-term follow-up on weight loss after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:627–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lara M, Baker M, Larson C, et al. Travel distance, age, and sex as factors in follow-up visit compliance in the post-gastric bypass population. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1:17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McVay M, Friedman K, Applegate K, et al. Patient predictors of follow-up care attendance in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:956–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller B, Murphy K, O'Brien P, et al. Development of a measure of barriers to laproscopic adjustment gastric banding (LAGB) aftercare attendance. Obes Surg. 2016;26:776–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moroshko I, Brennan L, O-Brien P. Predictors of attrition in bariatric aftercare: a systemic review of the literature. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1640–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pontiroli A, Fossati A, Vedani P, et al. Post-surgery adherence to scheduled visits and compliance, more than personality disorders, predict outcomes of bariatric restrictive surgery in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1492–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schauer P, Bhatt D, Kirwan J, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes – 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):641–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sivagnanam P, Rhodes M. The importance of follow-up and distance from Centre in weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surgery Endoscopic. 2010;24:2432–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vidal P, Ramon J, Goday A, et al. Lack of adherence to follow-up visits after bariatric surgery: reasons and outcome. Obes Surg. 2014;24:179–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wheeler E, Prettyman A, Lenhard M, et al. Adherence to outpatient program postoperative appointments after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:515–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition, and MetabolismMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Division of SurgeryMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations