Obesity Surgery

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 376–386 | Cite as

Outcomes of Reoperation After Laparoscopic Gastric Plication Failure

  • Reza Heidari
  • Mohammad TalebpourEmail author
  • Saeed Soleyman-jahi
  • Atefeh Zeinoddini
  • Ali Sanjari Moghaddam
  • Atieh Talebpour
Original Contributions



Management of failed laparoscopic gastric plication (LGP), defined as weight regain or inadequate weight loss, is a challenging issue.


This prospective investigation was conducted in individuals with morbid obesity who had undergone LGP from 2000 to 2016. Patients with weight loss failure, weight regain, and regain-prone cases were indicated for reoperation. Re-plication, laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB), and modified jejunoileal bypass were done as revisional surgery.


Revisional surgery was performed in 102 of 124 patients who needed reoperation. Overall, 39 re-plication, 38 LOAGB, and 25 malabsorptive procedures were performed. Re-plication was the shortest surgery and had the shortest length of hospital stay. The percentage of TWL at 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up was 20.5%, 25%, and 26.8% for re-plication; 20.2%, 27%, and 30.5% for LOAGB; and 22.9%, 28.9%, and 32.6% for the malabsorptive procedure, respectively. In addition, the percentage of EWL at 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up was 62%, 74.6%, and 79.6% for re-plication; 51.6%, 68.2%, and 75.9% for LOAGB; and 55.4%, 70.1%, and 79.1% for malabsorptive procedure, respectively. In long-term follow-up, according to %TWL, LOAGB and malabsorptive procedure had better outcome compared to re-plication, whereas there was no statistically significant difference in %EWL among the three surgical approaches.


In terms of weight loss, reoperation on failed LGP was completely successful and no treatment failure was reported. All three revisional procedures, including re-plication, LOAGB, and malabsorptive procedure showed promising results and provided substantial weight loss. Since there is little information about the long-term efficacy and safety of revisional surgery on failed LGP, we highly recommend further investigations to confirm our results.


Obesity Revisional bariatric surgery Laparoscopic gastric plication Total weight loss Re-plication LOAGB 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

The Institutional Review Board of Tehran University of Medical Sciences approved the study protocol.


  1. 1.
    Kopelman P. Health risks associated with overweight and obesity. Obes Rev. 2007;8(s1):13–7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tremmel M, Gerdtham UG, Nilsson PM, Saha S. Economic burden of obesity: a systematic literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(4):435.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tsai AG, Williamson DF, Glick HA. Direct medical cost of overweight and obesity in the USA: a quantitative systematic review. Obes Rev. 2011;12(1):50–61.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Melissas J. IFSO guidelines for safety, quality, and excellence in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2008;18(5):497–500.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    DeMaria EJ. Bariatric surgery for morbid obesity. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(21):2176–83.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zeinoddini A, Heidari R, Talebpour M. Laparoscopic gastric plication in morbidly obese adolescents: a prospective study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(6):1135–9.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zeinoddini A, Heidari R, Talebpour M. Reply to commentary “laparoscopic gastric plication in morbidly obese adolescents: a prospective study”. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(6):1235–6.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Atlas H, Yazbek T, Garneau PY, et al. Is there a future for laparoscopic gastric greater curvature plication (LGGCP)? A review of 44 patients. Obes Surg. 2013;23(9):1397–403.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Talebpour M, Motamedi SM, Talebpour A, et al. Twelve year experience of laparoscopic gastric plication in morbid obesity: development of the technique and patient outcomes. Ann Surg Innov Res. 2012;6(1):7.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gumbs AA, Pomp A, Gagner M. Revisional bariatric surgery for inadequate weight loss. Obes Surg. 2007;17(9):1137–45.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Himpens J, Coromina L, Verbrugghe A, et al. Outcomes of revisional procedures for insufficient weight loss or weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2012;22(11):1746–54.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Langer FB, Bohdjalian A, Shakeri-Manesch S, et al. Inadequate weight loss vs secondary weight regain: laparoscopic conversion from gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2008;18(11):1381–6.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Talebpour A, Heidari R, Zeinoddini A, et al. Predictors of weight loss after laparoscopic gastric plication: a prospective study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015;25(3):177–81.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg. 2001;11(3):276–80.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fazel I, Pourshams A, Merat S, et al. Modified jejunoileal bypass surgery with biliary diversion for morbid obesity and changes in liver histology during follow-up. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(8):1033–8.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clinical Issues Committee. ASMBS policy statement on gastric plication. ASMBS policy statement on gastric plication. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(3):262.
  17. 17.
    Brethauer SA, Kothari S, Sudan R, et al. Systematic review on reoperative bariatric surgery: American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Revision Task Force. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(5):952–72.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mann JP, Jakes AD, Hayden JD, et al. Systematic review of definitions of failure in revisional bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25(3):571–4.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zerrweck C, Rodriguez JG, Aramburo E, et al. Revisional surgery following laparoscopic gastric plication. Obes Surg. 2017;27(1):38–43.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Albanese A, Prevedello L, Verdi D, et al. Laparoscopic gastric plication: an emerging bariatric procedure with high surgical revision rate. Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care. 2015;10(3):93–8.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, et al. One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: short- and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2012;22(5):697–703.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brethauer SA, Harris JL, Kroh M, et al. Laparoscopic gastric plication for treatment of severe obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(1):15–22.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Niazi M, Maleki AR, Talebpour M. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastric plication in morbidly obese patients: importance of postoperative follow-up. Obes Surg. 2013;23(1):87–92.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ramos A, Galvao Neto M, Galvao M, et al. Laparoscopic greater curvature plication: initial results of an alternative restrictive bariatric procedure. Obes Surg. 2010;20(7):913–8.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Skrekas G, Antiochos K, Stafyla VK. Laparoscopic gastric greater curvature plication: results and complications in a series of 135 patients. Obes Surg. 2011;21(11):1657–63.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fried M, Dolezalova K, Buchwald JN, et al. Laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGCP) for treatment of morbid obesity in a series of 244 patients. Obes Surg. 2012;22(8):1298–307.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ji Y, Wang Y, Zhu J, et al. A systematic review of gastric plication for the treatment of obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(6):1226–32.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Georgiadou D, Sergentanis TN, Nixon A, et al. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic mini gastric bypass. A systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(5):984–91.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang W, Wei PL, Lee YC, et al. Short-term results of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005;15(5):648–54.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1827–34.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bruzzi M, Voron T, Zinzindohoue F, et al. Revisional single-anastomosis gastric bypass for a failed restrictive procedure: 5-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(2):240–5.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Griffen Jr WO, Bivins BA, Bell RM. The decline and fall of the jejunoileal bypass. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1983;157(4):301–8.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Buchwald H, Rucker R. The rise and fall of jejunoileal bypass. Surgery of the Small Intestine Appleton Century Crofts, Norwalk, CT. 1987:529–41.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Darabi S, Talebpour M, Zeinoddini A, et al. Laparoscopic gastric plication versus mini-gastric bypass surgery in the treatment of morbid obesity: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(6):914–9.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Daley BJ, Cecil W, Clarke PC, et al. How slow is too slow? Correlation of operative time to complications: an analysis from the Tennessee surgical quality collaborative. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(4):550–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MedicicneTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.Universal Scientific, Educational, and Research Network (USERN)Tehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  3. 3.Ward of Laparoscopy, Department of Surgery, Sina HospitalTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  4. 4.School of MedicineShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations