Physical and Mental Impact of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on the Surgeon: French vs. American Positions. A Randomized and Controlled Study
- 74 Downloads
To determine the physical and mental impact on the primary surgeon, by the patient’s and surgical staff’s dispositions at the operating table, during laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy.
Materials and Methods
This is a randomized and controlled study that included 18 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy procedures performed by two surgeons in a private and academic hospital. The cases were randomized for the American or French position. After surgery, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration - Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) and the Body Part Discomfort (BPD) scales were applied to the primary surgeon.
An increased workload and more discomfort were reported when using the French position. The NASA-TLX was 28 ± 8 vs. 57 ± 18 (p = 0.001), and the BPD was 2 vs. 8 (p = 0.001).
The American position resulted in a lower physical and mental impact on the surgeon when performing a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
KeywordsGastrectomy Bariatric surgery Ergonomics Workload Discomfort
The authors funded the entire research.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval Statement
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 4.Doné, K, DiMartino, A, Judkins, T, Hallbeck, S, Oleynikov D. Evaluation of laparoscopic tools for usability and comfort. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet (2004) 48; 12:1359–62.Google Scholar
- 7.S. G.Hart, NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later, in Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES ’06), pp. 904–908, October 2006.Google Scholar
- 20.Catanzarite T, Tan-Kim J, Whitcomb E, et al. Ergonomics in surgery: a review. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;00:00–0.Google Scholar
- 21.Hoe VC, Urquhart DM, Kelsall HL, et al. Ergonomic design and training for preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb and neck in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;8:CD008570.Google Scholar