Effects of Two Preoperatory Weight Loss Diets on Hepatic Volume, Metabolic Parameters, and Surgical Complications in Morbid Obese Bariatric Surgery Candidates: a Randomized Clinical Trial
- 75 Downloads
To assess which type of preoperative dietary strategy is most effective in reducing liver volume and assessing its influence on different biochemical parameters and on surgical complications in individuals undergoing bariatric surgery.
Parallel randomized trial comparing the effect of a very low calorie diet (VLCD) and a low calorie diet (LCD) for a period of 21 days before surgery on hepatic volume, anthropometric and biochemical parameters. Compliance and tolerance to the diets, surgical complications, and hospital stay were also determined.
Eighty-six morbid obese participants undergoing bariatric surgery were randomized. The hepatic volume was significantly reduced in both intervention groups, but no differences in changes between groups were detected. The reduction in the hepatic volume was higher in those patients with a baseline hepatic volume > 3 L compared to those with < 3 L (adjusted P value < 0.001). The percentages of total weight lost were 5.8 and 4.2% (adjusted P value = 0.004) for participants on the VLCD and LCD, respectively. There were no differences between groups for any of the biochemical parameters analyzed, nor in the number of surgical complications nor the length of hospital stay. Adherence to the diet was good; nevertheless, participants in the VLCD intervention showed worse tolerance.
In subjects with morbid obesity undergoing bariatric surgery, compared to a LCD, a preoperative 21-day intervention with VLCD is more effective in terms of reducing total body weight but not in terms of reducing the liver volume. Both types of preoperative diets have similar effects on clinical biochemical parameters, rate of surgical complications, and hospital length stay.
KeywordsPreoperative diet Bariatric surgery Liver size Weight loss
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of Interest
Author 9 reports receiving a grant from Nestle thorough his Institution. The rest of authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.World Health Organization (WHO) –NCD RisC. (NCD RiSk Factor Collaboration). [Internet]. 2017. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/
- 2.Attar BM, Van Thiel DH. Current concepts and management approaches in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Sci World J [Internet]. 2013;2013. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=emed11&NEWS=N&AN=2013259483
- 3.Sasaki A, Nitta H, Otsuka K, Umemura A, Baba S, Obuchi T, et al. Bariatric surgery and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Current and potential future treatments. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2014;5(OCT):1–6.Google Scholar
- 7.Van-Nieuwenhove Y. Preoperative Very Low-Calorie Diet and Operative Outcome After Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass. A Randomized Multicenter Study. Arch Surg. 2011;146(11):1300. Available from: http://archsurg.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1107206#METHODS%5Cn. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22106323%5Cnhttp://archsurg.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1107206 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Faria SL, Faria OP, de Cardeal MA, et al. Effects of a very low calorie diet in the preoperative stage of bariatric surgery: a randomized trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(1):230–7. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550728914002573 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Carbajo MA, Castro MJ, Kleinfinger S, et al. Effects of a balanced energy and high protein formula diet (Vegestart complet®) vs. low-calorie regular diet in morbid obese patients prior to bariatric surgery (laparoscopic single anastomosis gastric bypass): a prospective, double-blind randomized study. Nutr Hosp. 2010;25(6):939–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar