Advertisement

Laparoscopic-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block as Part of Multimodal Analgesia in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Jaime Ruiz-Tovar
  • Alejandro Garcia
  • Carlos Ferrigni
  • Juan Gonzalez
  • Cesar Levano-Linares
  • Montiel Jimenez-Fuertes
  • Carolina Llavero
  • Manuel Duran
Original Contributions
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Despite the ultrasound guidance of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks has allowed greater precision of needle placement in the desired tissue plane, visualization of the abdominal wall muscles can be hindered by morbid obesity and could lead to failed regional anesthesia. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and effect of laparoscopic-guided TAP block in patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and to compare it with port-site infiltration.

Patients and Methods

A prospective randomized clinical trial was performed. Patients were randomized into two groups: patients undergoing laparoscopic-guided TAP (TAP-lap) and patients undergoing port-site infiltration (PSI). Pain quantification as measured by visual analogic scale (VAS) and morphine needs during the first 24 h were evaluated.

Results

One hundred and forty patients were included, 70 in each group. The mean operation time was 83.3 + 15.6 min in TAP-lap and 80.5 + 14.4 min in PSI (NS). The mean postoperative pain, as measured by VAS, 24 h after surgery was 16.8 + 11.2 mm in PSI and 10 + 8.1 mm in TAP-lap (p = 0.001). Morphine rescues were necessary in 13.2% in PSI and 2.9% in TAP-lap (p = 0.026). The mean hospital stay was 2.1 + 1.2 days in TAP-lap and 2.9 + 1.3 days in PSI (p = 0.019). Hospital discharge during the first 48 h after surgery was possible in 52.9% of the patients in PSI and 71% in TAP-lap (OR 4.75; 95% CI 2.1–10.8; p = 0.029).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic-guided TAP block can reduce postoperative pain, opioid needs, and hospital stay, when compared with port-site infiltration with the same anesthetic drug, without increasing operation time.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03203070

Keywords

Transversus abdominis plane block Laparoscopy Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Postoperative pain 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Statement of Human Rights

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

References

  1. 1.
    Bray GA. Medical consequences of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:2583–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sullivan PW, Ghushchyan VH, Ben-Joseph R. The impact of obesity on diabetes, hyperlipidemia and hypertension in the United States. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:1063–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cantore F, Boni L, Di Giuseppe M, et al. Pre-incisional local infiltration with levobupivacaine reduces pain and analgesic consumption after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a new device for day-case procedure. Int J Surg. 2008;6:89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bertin PM. Liposome bupivacaine for postsurgical pain in an obese woman with chronic pain undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2014;8:21–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the postoperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on acute pain management. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:248–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schumann R, Shikora S, Weiss JM, et al. A comparison of multimodal perioperative analgesia to epidural pain management after gastric bypass surgery. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:469–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ruiz-Tovar J, Muñoz JL, Gonzalez J, et al. Postoperative pain after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: comparison of three analgesic schemes (isolated intravenous analgesia, epidural analgesia associated with intravenous analgesia and port-sites infiltration with bupivacaine associated with intravenous analgesia). Surg Endosc 2017; 31:231–236Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McDonnell JG, O’Donnell BD, Farrell T, et al. Transversus abdominis plane block: a cadaveric and radiological evaluation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32:399–404.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    El-Dawlatly AA, Turkistani A, Kettner SC, et al. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: description of a new technique and comparison with conventional systemic analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:763–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wassef M, Lee DY, Levine JL, et al. Feasibility and analgesic efficacy of the transversus abdominis plane block after single-port laparoscopy in patients having bariatric surgery. J Pain Res. 2013;(6):837–41.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ahmad S, Nagle A, McCarthy RJ, et al. Postoperative hypoxemia in morbidly obese patients with and without obstructive sleep apnea undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:138–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rosenberg-Adamsen S, Lie C, Bernhard A, et al. Effect of oxygen treatment on heart rate after abdominal surgery. Anaesthesiology. 1999;90:380–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hadzic A. Textbook of regional anesthesia and acute pain management. 1st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2007.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nielsen KC, Guller U, Steele SM, et al. Influence of obesity on surgical regional anesthesia in the ambulatory setting: an analysis of 9,038 blocks. Anaesthesiology. 2005;102:181–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Joris J, Thiry E, Paris P, et al. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: characteristics and effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:379–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mouton WG, Bessel JR, Otten KT, et al. Pain after laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:445–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee IO, Kim SH, Kong MH, et al. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the effect and timing of incisional and intraperitoneal bupivacaine. Can J Anesth. 2001;48:545–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jimenez Fuertes M, Costa Navarro D. Colecistectomía laparoscópica ambulatoria y control del dolor postoperatorio: presentación de una serie de 100 casos. Cir Esp. 2015;93:181–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tam T, Harkins G, Wegrzyniak L, et al. Infiltration of bupivacaine local anesthetic to trocar insertion sites after laparoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, stratified, and controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:1015–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moncada R, Martinaitis L, Landecho M, et al. Does preincisional infiltration with bupivacaine reduce postoperative pain in laparoscopic bariatric surgery? Obes Surg. 2016;26:282–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Andersen LP, Werner MU, Rosenberg J, et al. Analgesic treatment in laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a systematic review of randomized trials. Obes Surg. 2014;24:462–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Singh S, Dhir S, Marmai K, et al. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks for post-cesarean delivery analgesia: a double-blind, dose-comparison, placebo-controlled randomized trial. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2013;22:188–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Walter CJ, Maxwell-Armstrong C, Pinkney TD, et al. A randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2366–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sinha A, Jayaraman L, Punhani D. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a double blind, randomized, controlled study. Obes Surg. 2013;23:548–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saranteas T. Limitations in ultrasound imaging techniques in anesthesia: obesity and muscle atrophy? Anesth Analg. 2009;108:660–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Feigenbaum H. Physics and instrumentation. In: Feingenbaum H, Armstrong WF, Rayan T, editors. Feigenbaum’s echocardiography. Philadelphia: Lippincott William and Wilkins; 2005. p. 12–5.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shmulewitz A, Teefey SA, Robinson BS. Factors affecting image quality and diagnostic efficacy in abdominal sonography: a prospective study of 140 patients. J Clin Ultrasound. 1993;21:623–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Said AM, Balamoun HA. Comntinuous trasnversus abdominis plane blocks via laparoscopically placed catheters for bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2017;27:2575–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Excelencia para el Estudio y Tratamiento de la ObesidadValladolidSpain
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Bariatric Surgery UnitUniversity Hospital Rey Juan CarlosMadridSpain
  3. 3.Obesity UnitGarcilaso ClinicMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations