Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 28, Issue 9, pp 2979–2982 | Cite as

Utilization of Public System for Gastric Bands Placed by Private Providers: a 4-Year Population-Based Analysis in Ontario, Canada

  • Kristel Lobo Prabhu
  • Allan Okrainec
  • Azusa Maeda
  • Refik Saskin
  • David Urbach
  • Chaim M. Bell
  • Timothy D. JacksonEmail author
Brief Communication
  • 78 Downloads

Abstract

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) placement remains a common bariatric procedure. While LAGB procedure is performed within private clinics in most Canadian provinces, public health care is often utilized for LAGB-related reoperations. We identified 642 gastric band removal procedures performed in Ontario from 2011 to 2014 using population-level administrative data. The number of procedures performed increased annually from 101 in 2011 to 220 in 2014. Notably, 54.7% of the patients required laparotomy, and 17.6% of patients underwent a subsequent bariatric surgery. Our findings demonstrated that LAGB placement in private clinics resulted in a large number of band removal procedures performed within the public system. This represents a significant public health concern that may result in significant health care utilization and patient morbidity.

Keywords

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band Gastric band removal Bariatric surgery Health care utilization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study made use of de-identified data from the ICES Data Repository, which is managed by the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences with support from its funders and partners: Canada’s Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR), the Ontario SPOR Support Unit, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Government of Ontario.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethics Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Does not apply.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The opinions, results, and conclusions reported are those of the authors. No endorsement by ICES or any of its funders or partners is intended or should be inferred. Parts of this material are based on data and information compiled and provided by CIHI. However, the analyses, conclusions, opinions and statements expressed herein are those of the author, and not necessarily those of CIHI.

References

  1. 1.
    Belachew M, Legrand M, Vincenti VV, et al. Laparoscopic placement of adjustable silicone gastric band in the treatment of morbid obesity: how to do it. Obes Surg. 1995;5(1):66–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25(10):1822–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hutter MM, Schirmer BD, Jones DB, et al. First report from the American College of Surgeons—bariatric surgery center network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg. 2011;254(3):410–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arapis K, Tammaro P, Parenti LR, et al. Long-term results after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: 18-year follow-up in a single university unit. Obes Surg. 2017;27(3):630–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vinzens F, Kilchenmann A, Zumstein V, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB): results of a Swiss single-center study of 405 patients with up to 18 years' follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:1313–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elnahas A, Graybiel K, Farrokhyar F, et al. Revisional surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(3):740–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jackson TD, Saleh F, Quereshy FA, et al. Short-term morbidity associated with removal and revision of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(6):1110–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fulton C, Sheppard C, Birch D, et al. A comparison of revisional and primary bariatric surgery. Can J Surg. 2017;60(3):205–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eid I, Birch DW, Sharma AM, et al. Complications associated with adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: a surgeon’s guides. Can J Surg. 2011;54(1):61–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cobourn C, Chapman MA, Ali A, et al. Five-year weight loss experience of outpatients receiving laparoscopic adjustable gastric band surgery. Obes Surg. 2013;23(7):903–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elnahas A, Jackson TD, Okrainec A, et al. The effect of the Ontario Bariatric Network on health services utilization after bariatric surgery: a retrospective cohort study. CMAJ Open. 2016;4(3):E489–e95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martin AR, Klemensberg J, Klein LV, et al. Comparison of public and private bariatric surgery services in Canada. Can J Surg. 2011;54(3):154–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Division of General Surgery, Toronto Western HospitalUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Institute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Department of Medicine and Division of General Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai HospitalUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations