Advertisement

Trocar Site Hernias in Bariatric Surgery—an Underestimated Issue: a Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Ioannis Karampinis
  • Eliette Lion
  • Maurizio Grilli
  • Svetlana Hetjens
  • Christel Weiss
  • Georgi Vassilev
  • Steffen Seyfried
  • Mirko OttoEmail author
Review Article

Abstract

The reported incidence of trocar site hernias in bariatric surgery ranges between 0.5 and 3%. The best available evidence derives from retrospective studies analysing prospective databases, thus including only patients who presented with symptoms or received surgical treatment due to trocar site hernias after a laparoscopic bariatric procedure. A systematic literature research was conducted up until September 2017. Search strategies included proper combinations of the MeSH terms ‘laparoscopy’ and ‘bariatric surgery’, ‘trocar/port’ and ‘hernia’. Searches were not limited by publication type or language. The review was registered in PROSPERO (ID 85102) and performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Sixty-eight publications were included. Pooled hernia incidence was 3.22 (range 0–39.3%). Thirteen trials reported systematic closure of the fascia; 12 trials reported no closure. Data availability did not allow for pooling to calculate relative risk. Higher BMI and specific hernia examination using imaging modalities were associated with a significantly higher incidence of trocar site hernias. Studies dedicated to detection of TsH reported a pooled incidence of 24.5%. Trocar site hernias are an underestimated complication of minimally invasive multiportal bariatric surgery. While high-quality trials are not available allowing for a precise calculation of the incidence, existing data are indicative of very high incidence rates. Risk factors for developing a trocar site hernia in bariatric surgery have not yet been systematically analysed. Prospective studies in this field are necessary.

Keywords

Port site hernia Surgical morbidity Adipositas Bariatric surgery Incisional hernia 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval Statement

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Informed Consent Statement

Does not apply.

References

  1. 1.
    Flegal KM, Kruszon-Moran D, Carroll MD, et al. Trends in obesity among adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014. JAMA. 2016;315(21):2284–91.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Welbourn R, Pournaras DJ, Dixon J, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide: baseline demographic description and one-year outcomes from the second IFSO global registry report 2013–2015. Obes Surg. 2018;28(2):313–22.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anwar M, Collins J, Kow L, et al. Long-term efficacy of a low-pressure adjustable gastric band in the treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2008;247(5):771–8.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zehetner J, Holzinger F, Triaca H, et al. A 6-year experience with the Swedish adjustable gastric band prospective long-term audit of laparoscopic gastric banding. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(1):21–8.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kadar N, Reich H, Liu CY, et al. Incisional hernias after major laparoscopic gynecologic procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168(5):1493–5.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bergemann JL, Hibbert ML, Harkins G, et al. Omental herniation through a 3-mm umbilical trocar site: unmasking a hidden umbilical hernia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001;11(3):171–3.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ahlqvist S, Bjork D, Weisby L, et al. Trocar site hernia after gastric bypass. Surg Technol Int. 2017;30:170–4.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scozzari G, Zanini M, Cravero F, et al. High incidence of trocar site hernia after laparoscopic or robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(10):2890–8.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mendoza D, Newman RC, Albala D, et al. Laparoscopic complications in markedly obese urologic patients (a multi-institutional review). Urology. 1996;48(4):562–7.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maietta P, Milone M, Coretti G, et al. Retrieval of the gastric specimen following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Experience on 275 cases. Int J Surg. 2016;28(Suppl 1):S124–7.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weiner R, Wagner D, Bockhorn H. Laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999;9(1):23–30.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Corcelles R, Boules M, Froylich D, et al. Laparoscopic three-port sleeve gastrectomy: a single institution case series. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016;26(5):361–5.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ternamian AM, Deitel M. Endoscopic threaded imaging port (EndoTIP) for laparoscopy: experience with different body weights. Obes Surg. 1999;9(1):44–7.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chakhtoura G, Zinzindohoue F, Ghanem Y, et al. Primary results of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in a French obesity-surgery specialized university hospital. Obes Surg. 2008;18(9):1130–3.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bonatti H, Hoeller E, Kirchmayr W, et al. Ventral hernia repair in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2004;14(5):655–8.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scopinaro N, Marinari GM, Camerini G. Laparoscopic standard biliopancreatic diversion: technique and preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2002;12(3):362–5.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Susmallian S, Ezri T, Charuzi I. Laparoscopic repair of access port site hernia after lap-band (R) system implantation. Obes Surg. 2002;12(5):682–4.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shoar S, Aboutaleb S, Karem M, et al. Comparison of two specimen retrieval techniques in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: what is the role of endobag? Surg Endosc. 2017;31:4883–7.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    DeMaria EJ, Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, et al. Results of 281 consecutive total laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2002;235(5):640–5. discussion 645–647Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mizrahi I, Alkurd A, Ghanem M, et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients older than 60 years. Obes Surg. 2014;24(6):855–60.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chevallier JM, Zinzindohoue F, Douard R, et al. Complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: experience with 1,000 patients over 7 years. Obes Surg. 2004;14(3):407–14.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zinzindohoue F, Chevallier JM, Douard R, et al. Laparoscopic gastric banding: a minimally invasive surgical treatment for morbid obesity: prospective study of 500 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2003;237(1):1–9.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Triantafyllidis G, Lazoura O, Sioka E, et al. Anatomy and complications following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: radiological evaluation and imaging pitfalls. Obes Surg. 2011;21(4):473–8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Antanavicius G, Sucandy I. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: the utility of the robotic system in bariatric surgery. J Robot Surg. 2013;7(3):261–6.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Loy JJ, Youn HA, Schwack B, et al. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in patients aged seventy and older. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(2):284–9.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rubin M, Benchetrit S, Lustigman H, et al. Laparoscopic gastric banding with Lap-Band for morbid obesity: two-step technique may improve outcome. Obes Surg. 2001;11(3):315–7.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang W, Wei PL, Lee YC, et al. Short-term results of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005;15(5):648–54.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Marema RT, Perez M, Buffington CK. Comparison of the benefits and complications between laparoscopic and open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgeries. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(4):525–30.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wiesner W, Schob O, Hauser RS, et al. Adjustable laparoscopic gastric banding in patients with morbid obesity: radiographic management, results, and postoperative complications. Radiology. 2000;216(2):389–94.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Derici S, Atila K, Bora S, et al. Simple, safe, and cost-effective technique for resected stomach extraction in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016; Article ID 7090128, 4 pages, 2016.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W, et al. Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2000;232(4):515–29.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Casella G, Soricelli E, Fantini A, et al. A time-saving technique for specimen extraction in sleeve gastrectomy. World J Surg. 2010;34(4):765–7.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Regan JP, Inabnet WB, Gagner M, et al. Early experience with two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as an alternative in the super-super obese patient. Obes Surg. 2003;13(6):861–4.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gibson SC, Le Page PA, Taylor CJ. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: review of 500 cases in single surgeon Australian practice. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85(9):673–7.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chiu CC, Lee WJ, Wang W, et al. Prevention of trocar-wound hernia in laparoscopic bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006;16(7):913–8.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bou Nassif G, Scetbun E, Lecurieux-Lafayette C, et al. “Hand-over-hand grasping technique”: a fast and safe procedure for specimen extraction in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1391.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sanchez-Pernaute A, Perez-Aguirre E, Botella AG, et al. Prophylactic closure of trocar orifices with an intraperitoneal mesh (ventralex((R))) in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2008;18(11):1489–91.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Arias E, Martinez PR, Ka Ming Li V, et al. Mid-term follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy as a final approach for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2009;19(5):544–8.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Szold A, Abu-Abeid S. Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for morbid obesity: results and complications in 715 patients. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(2):230–3.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Coskun H, Bozbora A, Ogunc G, et al. Adjustable gastric banding in a multicenter study in Turkey. Obes Surg. 2003;13(2):294–6.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Keidar A, Carmon E, Szold A, et al. Port complications following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2005;15(3):361–5.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hans PK, Guan W, Lin S, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy from a single center in mainland China. Asian J Surg. 2017 April 17; [Epub ahead of print]. Accessed on 07/06/2017. Available at:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2017.04.003.
  43. 43.
    Belachew M, Belva PH, Desaive C. Long-term results of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2002;12(4):564–8.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Patel S, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. Reasons and outcomes of reoperative bariatric surgery for failed and complicated procedures (excluding adjustable gastric banding). Obes Surg. 2011;21(8):1209–19.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T. Complications of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 1,040 patients--what have we learned? Obes Surg. 2000;10(6):509–13.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Armstrong J, O'Malley SP. Outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a safe and effective procedure? Int J Surg. 2010;8(1):69–71.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nocca D, Krawczykowsky D, Bomans B, et al. A prospective multicenter study of 163 sleeve gastrectomies: results at 1 and 2 years. Obes Surg. 2008;18(5):560–5.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Parikh MS, Fielding GA, Ren CJ. U.S. experience with 749 laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands: intermediate outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(12):1631–5.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lakdawala M, Agarwal A, Dhar S, et al. Single-incision sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. A 2-year comparative analysis of 600 patients. Obes Surg. 2015;25(4):607–14.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sakran N, Raziel A, Goitein O, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity in 3003 patients: results at a high-volume bariatric center. Obes Surg. 2016;26(9):2045–50.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Major P, Janik MR, Wysocki M, et al. Comparison of circular- and linear-stapled gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a multicenter study. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017;12(2):140–6.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Balsiger BM, Ernst D, Giachino D, et al. Prospective evaluation and 7-year follow-up of Swedish adjustable gastric banding in adults with extreme obesity. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(11):1470–6. discussion 1446–1447Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lattuada E, Zappa MA, Mozzi E, et al. Injection port and connecting tube complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2010;20(4):410–4.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    van Dielen FM, Soeters PB, de Brauw LM, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus open vertical banded gastroplasty: a prospective randomized trial. Obes Surg. 2005;15(9):1292–8.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters G. Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Surg. 2010;252(2):319–24.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Frezza EE, Reddy S, Gee LL, et al. Complications after sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2009;19(6):684–7.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Aly MYF, Lee WJ. Letter to the editor: trocar site hernia prevention in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2016;26(9):2227–8.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Michalik M, Lech P, Bobowicz M, et al. A 5-year experience with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding--focus on outcomes, complications, and their management. Obes Surg. 2011;21(11):1682–6.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Coblijn UK, de Raaff CA, van Wagensveld BA, et al. Trocar port hernias after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2016;26(3):546–51.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Rosenthal RJ, Szomstein S, Kennedy CI, et al. Direct visual insertion of primary trocar and avoidance of fascial closure with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(1):124–8.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Higa KD, Ho T, Boone KB. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: technique and 3-year follow-up. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001;11(6):377–82.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sucher R, Resch T, Mohr E, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: analysis of 80 cases in a single center. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24(2):83–8.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Lee M, Nam EJ, Kim S, et al. Two-port access laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013;23(5):935–42.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rossi A, McLaughlin D, Witte S, et al. An expanded retrospective review of trocar site hernias in laparoscopic gastric bypass patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(6):633–5.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Dresel A, Kuhn JA, Westmoreland MV, et al. Establishing a laparoscopic gastric bypass program. Am J Surg. 2002;184(6):617–20. discussion 620Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Johnson WH, Fecher AM, McMahon RL, et al. VersaStep trocar hernia rate in unclosed fascial defects in bariatric patients. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(10):1584–6.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Toouli J, Kow L, Collins J, et al. Efficacy of a low-pressure laparoscopic adjustable gastric band for morbid obesity: patients at long term in a multidisciplinary center. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(3 Suppl):S31–8.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Catheline JM, Fysekidis M, Bachner I, et al. Five-year results of sleeve gastrectomy. J Visc Surg. 2013;150(5):307–12.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Pilone V, Di Micco R, Hasani A, et al. Trocar site hernia after bariatric surgery: our experience without fascial closure. Int J Surg. 2014;12(Suppl 1):S83–6.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Puzziferri N, Austrheim-Smith IT, Wolfe BM, et al. Three-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2006;243(2):181–8.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Arru L, Azagra JS, Goergen M, et al. Three-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: feasibility and short outcomes in 25 consecutives super-obese patients. Cir Esp. 2013;91(5):294–300.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Rebibo L, Dhahri A, Chivot C, et al. Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using a specific open laparoscopy technique. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(4):791–6.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Erdas E, Dazzi C, Secchi F, et al. Incidence and risk factors for trocar site hernia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a long-term follow-up study. Hernia. 2012;16(4):431–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryHeidelberg UniversityMannheimGermany
  2. 2.Department of Library and Information SciencesHeidelberg UniversityMannheimGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Medical Statistic and Biomathematics, Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty MannheimHeidelberg UniversityMannheimGermany
  4. 4.Department of Surgery, Mannheim University Medical CentreUniversity of HeidelbergMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations