Outcomes in Super Obese Patients Undergoing One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass or Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
- 131 Downloads
The data on the role of OAGB in super obese patients and its direct comparison with LSG in super obese patients is scarce.
To compare weight loss, impact on comorbidities and nutritional parameters between LSG and OAGB in super obese patients.
Prospectively collected data of 75 matched patients with BMI > 50, who underwent either laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), was analyzed retrospectively. Percentage excess weight loss at 1 year and impact on comorbidities were compared in both the groups.
Both the groups were comparable for age, sex, BMI, and presence or absence of diabetes mellitus. Mean TWL% ± 2SD at 1 year was 30.09% ± 19.76 in patients undergoing LSG, while it was 39.9% ± 12.78 in patients undergoing OAGB (p < 0.001). In the LSG group, 85.7% and 66.67% of patients had remission of diabetes mellitus and hypertension, respectively, as compared to 77.77% and 78.5%, respectively, in the OAGB group. All the patients with OSA had a resolution of their symptoms in both the groups. Patients in the OAGB group became more folate deficient despite regular supplementation.
Weight loss following OAGB was found to be better than LSG in the super obese patients in our study. There was a similar resolution of comorbidities and a lesser rate of major complications in the OAGB group.
KeywordsOutcomes Super obese Sleeve gastrectomy One anastomosis gastric bypass
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Since this is a retrospective study, there was no commission or omission of intervention for the study purpose and all the interventions were done in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required; however, a written informed consent was taken from each patient for the surgical procedure.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Clinical Issues Committee of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Updated position statement on sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2010;6:1–5.Google Scholar
- 10.Villamere J, Gebhart A, Vu S, et al. Body mass index is predictive of higher in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass but not laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or gastric banding. Am Surg. 2014;80:1039–43.Google Scholar
- 16.Epstein LJ, Kristo D, Strollo PJ, et al. Clinical guideline for the evaluation, management and long-term care of obstructive sleep apnea in adults. J Clin Sleep Med JCSM Off Publ Am Acad Sleep Med. 2009;5:263–76.Google Scholar
- 27.Lee W-J, Chong K, Ser K-H, et al. Gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg Chic Ill 1960. 2011;146:143–8.Google Scholar