Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 698–704 | Cite as

Primary Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review

  • Chetan D. ParmarEmail author
  • O. Efeotor
  • A. Ali
  • Pratik Sufi
  • K. K. Mahawar
Review Article
First Online:
  • 62 Downloads

Abstract

We aim to investigate any advantages of primary banded sleeve gastrectomy (BSG) over laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). A literature search was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. There were 236 patients with the mean age of 45.4 years, BMI of 47.9 kg/m2, operating time of 96.8 min, and LOS of 5.25 days. The median follow-up (F/U) was 1 year with mean F/U of 78% patients. Mean %EWL was 77.4% at 12 months, the complication rate of 11.8%, reoperation rate of 5.5%, and the mortality rate of 0.85%. There are small numbers of published cases with primary BSG in literature. This review is unable to examine the benefits versus risks of BSG in the long term. We need randomized studies with long-term F/U to adequately evaluate this procedure.

Keywords

Bariatric surgery Obesity surgery Banded sleeve gastrectomy Sleeve gastrectomy Weight regain 

Abbreviations

SG

sleeve gastrectomy

BSG

primary banded sleeve gastrectomy

PRISMA

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

EWL

excess weight loss

BMI

body mass index

RCT

randomized controlled trial

RYGB

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

GORD

gastroesophageal reflux disease

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Authors’ Contribution

CP, OE, and KM participated in the literature search. KM conceived the idea for the topic. CP collected most of the data and OE analyzed it. CP, OE, and KM contributed to manuscript writing. All authors contributed to the manuscript. All authors have seen the final version and approve it.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

For this type of study, ethical approval is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Welbourn R, Pournaras DJ, Dixon J, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide: baseline demographic description and one-year outcomes from the second IFSO Global Registry Report 2013-2015. Obes Surg. 2018;28(2):313–22.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Felsenreich DM, Langer FB, Kefurt R, et al. Weight loss, weight regain, and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(9):1655–62.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):255–65.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shoar S, Saber AA. Long-term and midterm outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(2):170–80.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes - 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):641–51.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahawar KK, Parikh C, Carr WRJ, et al. Primary banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2014;24(10):1771–92.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burton PR, Brown WA. The mechanism of weight loss with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: induction of satiety not restriction. Int J Obes. 2011;35(Suppl 3):S26–30.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lauti M, Kularatna M, Hill AG, et al. Weight regain following sleeve gastrectomy-a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26(6):1326–34.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moher D et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9. w64Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fink JM, Hoffmann N, Kuesters S, et al. Banding the sleeve improves weight loss in midterm follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27(4):1098–103.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karcz WK, Karcz-Socha I, Marjanovic G, et al. To band or not to band--early results of banded sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2014;24(4):660–5.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tognoni V et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic banded sleeve gastrectomy: first prospective pilot randomized study. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:6419603.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Daigle CR, Corcelles R, Schauer PR. Primary silicone-banded laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a pilot study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015;25(2):94–7.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miguel GP et al. Glucose homeostasis and weight loss in morbidly obese patients undergoing banded sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective clinical study. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009;64(11):1093–8.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alexander JW, Martin Hawver LR, Goodman HR. Banded sleeve gastrectomy--initial experience. Obes Surg. 2009;19(11):1591–6.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lemmens L, Van Den Bossche J, Zaveri H, et al. Banded sleeve gastrectomy: better long-term results? A long-term cohort study until 5 years follow up in obese and superobese patients. Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2687–95.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Silecchia G, Boru C, Pecchia A, et al. Effectiveness of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (first stage of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch) on co-morbidities in super-obese high-risk patients. Obes Surg. 2006;16(9):1138–44.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marceau P, Biron S, Bourque RA, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with a new type of gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 1993;3(1):29–35.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baltasar A, Serra C, Pérez N, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a multi-purpose bariatric operation. Obes Surg. 2005;15(8):1124–8.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weiner RA, Weiner S, Pomhoff I, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy--influence of sleeve size and resected gastric volume. Obes Surg. 2007;17(10):1297–305.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eid GM et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for super obese patients: forty-eight percent excess weight loss after 6 to 8 years with 93% follow-up. Ann Surg. 2012;256(2):262–5.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Van de Laar AW et al. Sensitivity and specificity of 50% excess weight loss (50%EWL) and twelve other bariatric criteria for weight loss success. Obes Surg. 2018;28(8):2297–2304Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Emile SH, Elfeki H, Elalfy K, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy then and now: an updated systematic review of the progress and short-term outcomes over the last 5 years. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017;27(5):307–17.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Foo JW, Balshaw J, Tan MHL, et al. Leaks in fixed-ring banded sleeve gastrectomies: a management approach. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(8):1259–64.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sucandy I, Chrestiana D, Bonanni F, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. The importance of preoperative evaluation and selection. N Am J Med Sci. 2015;7(5):189–93.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Parmar CD, Mahawar KK, Boyle M, et al. Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to RYGB is effective for GORD but not for further weight loss. Obes Surg. 2017 Jul;27(7):1651–8.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Burgerhart JS, Schotborgh CAI, Schoon EJ, et al. Effect of sleeve gastrectomy on gastroesophageal reflux. Obes Surg. 2014;24(9):1436–41.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Whittington HospitalLondonUK
  2. 2.Imperial HospitalLondonUK
  3. 3.Sunderland Royal HospitalSunderlandUK

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options