Obesity Surgery

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 559–566 | Cite as

Detecting Bile Reflux—the Enigma of Bariatric Surgery

  • Thomas A. Eldredge
  • Jennifer C. Myers
  • George K. Kiroff
  • Jonathan Shenfine
Review Article
  • 88 Downloads

Abstract

Duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux, or bile reflux, is a condition for which there is no diagnostic gold standard, and it remains controversial in terms of carcinoma risk. This is pertinent in the context of an increasingly overweight population who are undergoing weight-loss operations that theoretically further increase the risk of bile reflux. This article reviews investigations for bile reflux based on efficacy, patient tolerability, cost, and infrastructure requirements. At this time, whilst no gold standard exists, hepatobiliary scintigraphy is the least invasive investigation with good-patient tolerability, sensitivity, and reproducibility to be considered first-line for diagnosis of bile reflux. This review will guide clinicians investigating bile reflux.

Keywords

Bile reflux Fiberoptic spectrophotometry Impedance Scintigraphy Endoscopy 

Abbreviations

AUD

Australian dollars

DGER

Duodenogastroesophageal reflux

EGD

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

HIDA

Hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid

LES

Lower esophageal sphincter

MII-pH

Multi-channel intraluminal impedance-pH

SPECT

Single-photon emission computed tomography

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Associate Professor Dylan Bartholomeusz (Royal Adelaide Hospital Nuclear Medicine Department) and Ms. Josie Burfield and Mr. Marcus Tippett (Royal Adelaide Hospital Department of Gastrointestinal Investigation) for their input regarding the costing of investigations.

Author Contributions

T.A.E. and J.S. conceived and designed research; T.A.E. undertook the literature search and analyzed the data; T.A.E. interpreted the results; T.A.E. and J.C.M. drafted manuscript; T.A.E., J.C.M., G.K.K., and J.S. edited and revised manuscript; T.A.E., J.C.M., G.K.K., and J.S. approved final version of manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Author 1, Author 3, and Author 4 have no conflicts of interest or financial to declare. Author 2 provides educational activities for Medtronic Australasia.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Does not apply to this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Barr AC, Frelich MJ, Bosler ME, et al. GERD and acid reduction medication use following gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4989-4.
  2. 2.
    McQuaid KR, Laine L, Fennerty MB, et al. Systematic review: the role of bile acids in the pathogenesis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and related neoplasia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34(2):146–65.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04709.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sun D, Wang X, Gai Z, et al. Bile acids but not acidic acids induce Barrett’s esophagus. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(2):1384–92.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saarinen T, Rasanen J, Salo J, et al. Bile reflux scintigraphy after mini-gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2017;27(8):2083–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2608-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Salama TMS, Hassan MI. Incidence of biliary reflux esophagitis after laparoscopic omega loop gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techn. 2017;27(6):618–22.  https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen TF, Yadav PK, Wu RJ, et al. Comparative evaluation of intragastric bile acids and hepatobiliary scintigraphy in the diagnosis of duodenogastric reflux. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(14):211–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tulchinsky M, Ciak BW, Delbeke D, et al. SNM practice guideline for hepatobiliary scintigraphy 4.0. J Nucl Med Technol. 2010;38(4):210–8.  https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.110.082289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tolin RD, Malmud LS, Stelzer F, et al. Enterogastric reflux in normal subjects and patients with Bilroth II gastroenterostomy. Measurement of enterogastric reflux. Gastroenterology. 1979;77(5):1027–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aydin M, Yapar AF, Yapar Z. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy to detect duodenogastric reflux: intravenous administration of Tc-99m pertechnetate to define the location of the stomach. Clin Nucl Med. 2001;26(4):360.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00003072-200104000-00025.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baulieu F, Baulieu JL, Dorval E, et al. Scintigraphy in duodeno-gastric reflux: a new method of quantification. Nucl Med Commun. 1986;7(10):747–54.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00006231-198610000-00005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blue PW, Jackson JH, Ghaed N. Duodenogastroesophageal reflux. Demonstration with Tc-99m DISIDA imaging. Clin Nucl Med. 1984;9(4):238–9.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00003072-198404000-00014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bonaz B, Caravel JP, Hostein J, et al. Scintigraphic study of duodenogastric reflux. Value of a computerized image-subtraction method. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1988;12(5):436–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Borsato N, Bonavina L, Zanco P, et al. Proposal of a modified scintigraphic method to evaluate duodenogastroesophageal reflux. J Nucl Med. 1991;32(3):436–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Castedal M, Bjornsson E, Gretarsdottir J, et al. Scintigraphic assessment of interdigestive duodenogastric reflux in humans: distinguishing between duodenal and biliary reflux material. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;35(6):590–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/003655200750023543.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Drane WE, Karvelis K, Johnson DA, et al. Scintigraphic evaluation of duodenogastric reflux. Problems, pitfalls, and technical review. Clin Nucl Med. 1987;12(5):377–84.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00003072-198705000-00011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gerard PS, Gerczuk P, Finestone H. Bile reflux in the esophagus demonstrated by HIDA scintigraphy. Clin Nucl Med. 2007;32(3):224–5.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rlu.0000255039.24698.48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liron R, Parrilla P, Martinez de Haro LF, et al. Quantification of duodenogastric reflux in Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92(1):32–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lujan Mompean JA, Parrilla Paricio P, Robles Campos R, et al. Continuous 99mTc-HIDA infusion as a method for measuring duodenogastric reflux. Br J Surg. 1990;77(4):425–7.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800770422.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mackie CR, Wisbey ML, Cuschieri A. Milk 99Tcm-EHIDA test for enterogastric bile reflux. Br J Surg. 1982;69(2):101–4.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800690215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shaffer EA, McOrmond P, Duggan H. Quantitative cholescintigraphy: assessment of gallbladder filling and emptying and duodenogastric reflux. Gastroenterology. 1980;79(5 Pt 1):899–906.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eriksson B, Emas S, Jacobsson H, et al. Comparison of gastric aspiration and HIDA scintigraphy in detecting fasting duodenogastric bile reflux. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1988;23(5):607–10.  https://doi.org/10.3109/00365528809093920.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mittal BR, Ibrarullah M, Agarwal DK, et al. Comparative evaluation of scintigraphy and upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy for detection of duodenogastric reflux. Ann Nucl Med. 1994;8(3):183–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03164995.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sorgi M, Wolverson RL, Mosimann F, et al. Sensitivity and reproducibility of a bile reflux test using 99mTc HIDA. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1984;92:30–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lo RC, Huang WL, Fan YM. Evaluation of bile reflux in HIDA images based on fluid mechanics. Comput Biol Med. 2015;60:51–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.02.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bechi P, Falciai R, Baldini F, Cosi F, Pucciani F, Boscherini S, editors. New fiber optic sensor for ambulatory entero-gastric reflux detection. Fiber Optic Medical and Fluorescent Sensors and Applications; 1992: Proc. SPIE.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kiroff GK, Devitt PG, DeYoung NJ, et al. Bile salt-induced injury of rabbit oesophageal mucosa measured by hydrogen ion disappearance. Aust N Z J Surg. 1987;57(2):111–7.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1987.tb01314.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Barrett MW, Myers JC, Watson DI, et al. Dietary interference with the use of Bilitec to assess bile reflux. Dis Esophagus. 1999;12(1):60–4.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2050.1999.00019.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Manifold DK, Anggiansah A, Marshall RE, et al. Reproducibility and intragastric variation of duodenogastric reflux using ambulatory gastric bilirubin monitoring. Dig Dis Sci. 2001;46(1):78–85.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005609825180.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bechi P, Pucciani F, Baldini F, et al. Long-term ambulatory enterogastric reflux monitoring. Validation of a new fiberoptic technique. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38(7):1297–306.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01296082.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vaezi MF, Lacamera RG, Richter JE. Validation studies of Bilitec 2000: an ambulatory duodenogastric reflux monitoring system. Am J Phys. 1994;267(6 Pt 1):G1050–7.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fein M, Fuchs KH, Bohrer T, et al. Fiberoptic technique for 24-hour bile reflux monitoring. Standards and normal values for gastric monitoring. Dig Dis Sci. 1996;41(1):216–25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02208607.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stipa F, Stein HJ, Feussner H, et al. Assessment of non-acid esophageal reflux: comparison between long-term reflux aspiration test and fiberoptic bilirubin monitoring. Dis Esophagus. 1997;10(1):24–8.  https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/10.1.24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wong WM, Bautista J, Dekel R, et al. Feasibility and tolerability of transnasal/per-oral placement of the wireless pH capsule vs. traditional 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring—a randomized trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21(2):155–63.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02313.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wenner J, Johnsson F, Johansson J, et al. Wireless esophageal pH monitoring is better tolerated than the catheter-based technique: results from a randomized cross-over trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(2):239–45.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00939.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Barrett MW, Myers JC, Watson DI, et al. Detection of bile reflux: in vivo validation of the Bilitec fibreoptic system. Dis Esophagus. 2000;13(1):44–50.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2050.2000.00062.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dai F, Gong J, Zhang R, et al. Assessment of duodenogastric reflux by combined continuous intragastric pH and bilirubin monitoring. World J Gastroenterol. 2002;8(2):382–4.  https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v8.i2.382.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Champion G, Richter JE, Vaezi MF, et al. Duodenogastroesophageal reflux: relationship to pH and importance in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 1994;107(3):747–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(94)90123-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bechi P. Bilitec and “quantitation” of reflux: further acid comments. Gastroenterology. 1995;109(3):1023–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(95)90427-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tibbling Grahn L, Blackadder L, Franzen T, et al. Gastric bile monitoring: an in vivo and in vitro study of Bilitec reliability. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37(11):1334–7.  https://doi.org/10.1080/003655202761020632.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tack J, Bisschops R, Koek G, et al. Dietary restrictions during ambulatory monitoring of duodenogastroesophageal reflux. Dig Dis Sci. 2003;48(7):1213–20.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024130419914.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mi S, Lim DW, Turner JM, et al. Determination of bile acids in piglet bile by solid phase extraction and liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Lipids. 2016;51(3):359–72.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11745-016-4125-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vere CC, Cazacu S, Comanescu V, et al. Endoscopical and histological features in bile reflux gastritis. Romanian J Morphol Embryol. 2005;46(4):269–74.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chang WK, Lin CK, Chuan DC, et al. Duodenogastric reflux: proposed new endoscopic classification in symptomatic patients. J Med Sci (Taiwan). 2016;36(1):1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Stein HJ, Smyrk TC, DeMeester TR, et al. Clinical value of endoscopy and histology in the diagnosis of duodenogastric reflux disease. Surgery. 1992;112(4):796–803. discussion −4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Marshall REK, Anggiansah A, Owen WA, et al. The temporal relationship between oesophageal bile reflux and pH in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;10(5):385–92.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00042737-199805000-00006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Muller-Lissner SA. Measurements of bile salt reflux are influenced by the method of collecting gastric juice. Gastroenterology. 1985;89(6):1338–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(85)90652-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Silny J. Intraluminal multiple electric impedance procedure for measurement of gastrointestinal motility. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 1991;3(3):151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bredenoord AJ, Weusten BL, Timmer R, et al. Reproducibility of multichannel intraluminal electrical impedance monitoring of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(2):265–9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41084.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sifrim D, Castell D, Dent J, et al. Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux. Gut. 2004;53(7):1024–31.  https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2003.033290.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sharma N, Agrawal A, Freeman J, et al. An analysis of persistent symptoms in acid-suppressed patients undergoing impedance-pH monitoring. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6(5):521–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2008.01.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zerbib F, Roman S, Ropert A, et al. Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring and symptom analysis in GERD: a study in patients off and on therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(9):1956–63.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00711.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pace F, Sangaletti O, Pallotta S, et al. Biliary reflux and non-acid reflux are two distinct phenomena: a comparison between 24-hour multichannel intraesophageal impedance and bilirubin monitoring. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;42(9):1031–9.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00365520701245645.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gourcerol G, Verin E, Leroi AM, et al. Can multichannel intraluminal pH-impedance monitoring be limited to 3 hours? Comparison between ambulatory 24-hour and post-prandial 3-hour recording. Dis Esophagus. 2014;27(8):732–6.  https://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Smythe A, Bird NC, Johnson AG. Continuous monitoring of sodium ion concentration in the human stomach—a new technique for the detection of duodenogastric reflux. Digestion. 1992;52(1):20–5.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000200934.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Watson DI, Smythe A, Mangnall YF, et al. Detection of duodenal fluid in the oesophagus with a sodium ion selective electrode. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996;11(5):486–90.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.1996.tb00295.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Stoker DL, Williams JG, MacLeod MA, et al. The evaluation of a gastric bile probe. Nucl Med Commun. 1990;11(11):777–90.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00006231-199011000-00007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hausken T, Li XN, Goldman B, et al. Quantification of gastric emptying and duodenogastric reflux stroke volumes using three-dimensional guided digital color Doppler imaging. Eur J Ultrasound. 2001;13(3):205–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-8266(01)00134-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    King PM, Adam RD, Pryde A, et al. Relationships of human antroduodenal motility and transpyloric fluid movement: non-invasive observations with real-time ultrasound. Gut. 1984;25(12):1384–91.  https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.25.12.1384.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Nehra D. Bile in the esophagus-model for a bile acid biosensor. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(Suppl 1):S6–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas A. Eldredge
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jennifer C. Myers
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • George K. Kiroff
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jonathan Shenfine
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Discipline of Surgery, School of MedicineUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryQueen Elizabeth HospitalWoodville SouthAustralia
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryRoyal Adelaide HospitalAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations