Obesity Surgery

, Volume 27, Issue 12, pp 3092–3101 | Cite as

Reflux, Sleeve Dilation, and Barrett’s Esophagus after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Long-Term Follow-Up

  • Daniel Moritz Felsenreich
  • Ronald Kefurt
  • Martin Schermann
  • Philipp Beckerhinn
  • Ivan Kristo
  • Michael Krebs
  • Gerhard Prager
  • Felix B. Langer
Original Contributions

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most frequently performed bariatric procedure worldwide. De novo reflux might impact patients’ quality of life, requiring lifelong proton pump inhibitor medication. It also increases the risk of esophagitis and formation of Barrett’s metaplasia. Besides weight regain, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common reason for conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Methods

We performed 24-h pH metries, manometries, gastroscopies, and questionnaires focusing on reflux (GIQLI, RSI) in SG patients with a follow-up of more than 10 years who did not suffer from symptomatic reflux or hiatal hernia preoperatively.

Results

From a total of 53 patients, ten patients after adjustable gastric banding were excluded. From the remaining 43, six patients (14.0%) were converted to RYGB due to intractable reflux over a period of 130 months. Ten out of the remaining non-converted patients (n = 26) also suffered from symptomatic reflux. Gastroscopies revealed de novo hiatal hernias in 45% of the patients and Barrett’s metaplasia in 15%. SG patients suffering from symptomatic reflux scored significantly higher in the RSI (p = 0.04) and significantly lower in the GIQLI (p = 0.02) questionnaire.

Conclusions

This study shows a high incidence of Barrett’s esophagus and hiatal hernias at more than 10 years after SG. Its results therefore suggest maintaining pre-existing large hiatal hernia, GERD, and Barrett’s esophagus as relative contraindications to SG. The limitations of this study—its small sample size as well as the fact that it was based on early experience with SG—make drawing any general conclusions about this procedure difficult.

Keywords

Sleeve gastrectomy Reflux GERD Conversion to RYGB Long-term data 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the research committee of the Vienna Medical University and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of Interest

The authors DM Felsenreich, R Kefurt, M Schermann, P Beckerhinn, I Kristo, M Krebs, G Prager, and FB Langer declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P et al. Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Drahos J, Li L, Jick SS, et al. Metabolic syndrome in relation to Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: results from a large population-based case-control study in the clinical practice research Datalink. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;42:9–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    van Rutte PW, Smulders JF, de Zoete JP, et al. Outcome of sleeve gastrectomy as a primary bariatric procedure. Br J Surg. 2014;101:661–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spivak H, Rubin M, Sadot E, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using 42-French versus 32-French bougie: the first-year outcome. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1090–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rebecchi F, Allaix ME, Giaccone C, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a physiopathologic evaluation. Ann Surg. 2014;260:909–14. discussion 914-905CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chiu S, Birch DW, Shi X, et al. Effect of sleeve gastrectomy on gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:510–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Braghetto I, Csendes A. Prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus in bariatric patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2015Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters G. Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Surg. 2010;252:319–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deitel M, Crosby RD, Gagner M. The first international consensus summit for sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), New York City, October 25-27, 2007. Obes Surg. 2008;18:487–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Langer FB, Bohdjalian A, Shakeri-Leidenmuhler S, et al. Conversion from sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass—indications and outcome. Obes Surg. 2010;20:835–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Homan J, Betzel B, Aarts EO, et al. Secondary surgery after sleeve gastrectomy: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:771–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weiner RA, Theodoridou S, Weiner S. Failure of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy—further procedure? Obes Facts. 2011;4(Suppl 1):42–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Desart K, Rossidis G, Michel M, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux management with the LINX(R) system for gastroesophageal reflux disease following laparoscopic sleeve Gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:1782–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nedelcu M, Noel P, Iannelli A, et al. Revised sleeve gastrectomy (re-sleeve). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:1282–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Silecchia G, De Angelis F, Rizzello M, et al. Residual fundus or neofundus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: is fundectomy safe and effective as revision surgery? Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2899–903.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Galvez-Valdovinos R, Cruz-Vigo JL, Marin-Santillan E, et al. Cardiopexy with ligamentum teres in patients with hiatal hernia and previous sleeve gastrectomy: an alternative treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1539–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khan A, Kim A, Sanossian C, et al. Impact of obesity treatment on gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:1627–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eypasch E, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, et al. The gastrointestinal quality of life index. A clinical index for measuring patient status in gastroenterologic surgery. Chirurg. 1993;64:264–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice. 2002;16:274–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vage V, Sande VA, Mellgren G, et al. Changes in obesity-related diseases and biochemical variables after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a two-year follow-up study. BMC Surg. 2014;14:8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gibson SC, Le Page PA, Taylor CJ. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: review of 500 cases in single surgeon Australian practice. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85:673–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Daes J, Jimenez ME, Said N, et al. Improvement of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms after standardized laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2014;24:536–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sharma A, Aggarwal S, Ahuja V, et al. Evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux before and after sleeve gastrectomy using symptom scoring, scintigraphy, and endoscopy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:600–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ece I, Yilmaz H, Acar F et al. A new algorithm to reduce the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2016.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sheppard CE, Sadowski DC, de Gara CJ, et al. Rates of reflux before and after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity. Obes Surg. 2015;25:763–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    DuPree CE, Blair K, Steele SR, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with preexisting gastroesophageal reflux diseasennn: a national analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:328–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kular KS, Manchanda N, Rutledge R. Analysis of the five-year outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy and mini gastric bypass: a report from the Indian sub-continent. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1724–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Samakar K, McKenzie TJ, Tavakkoli A, et al. The effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with concomitant hiatal hernia repair on gastroesophageal reflux disease in the morbidly obese. Obes Surg. 2016;26:61–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sucandy I, Chrestiana D, Bonanni F, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. The importance of preoperative evaluation and selection. N Am J Med Sci. 2015;7:189–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lyon A, Gibson SC, De-loyde K, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: hiatal findings and their management influence outcome. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:530–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sieber P, Gass M, Kern B, et al. Five-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:243–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Soricelli E, Iossa A, Casella G, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy and crural repair in obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and/or hiatal hernia. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:356–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Boules M, Corcelles R, Guerron AD, et al. The incidence of hiatal hernia and technical feasibility of repair during bariatric surgery. Surgery. 2015;158:911–6. discussion 916-918CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rebecchi F, Allaix ME, Ugliono E, et al. Increased esophageal exposure to weakly acidic reflux 5 years after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2016;264:871–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bonavina L, DeMeester T, Fockens P, et al. Laparoscopic sphincter augmentation device eliminates reflux symptoms and normalizes esophageal acid exposure: one- and 2-year results of a feasibility trial. Ann Surg. 2010;252:857–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Reynolds JL, Zehetner J, Wu P, et al. Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation vs laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a matched-pair analysis of 100 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:123–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Crawford C, Gibbens K, Lomelin D et al. Sleeve gastrectomy and anti-reflux procedures. Surg Endosc. 2016.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ronkainen J, Aro P, Storskrubb T, et al. Prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus in the general population: an endoscopic study. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:1825–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gagner M. Is sleeve gastrectomy always an absolute contraindication in patients with Barrett’s? Obes Surg. 2016;26:715–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gorodner V, Buxhoeveden R, Clemente G, et al. Barrett’s esophagus after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: does regression occur? Surg Endosc. 2017;31:1849–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kindel TL, Oleynikov D. The improvement of gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett’s after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2016;26:718–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Overs SE, Freeman RA, Zarshenas N, et al. Food tolerance and gastrointestinal quality of life following three bariatric procedures: adjustable gastric banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2012;22:536–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of General Surgery, Department of SurgeryMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department for SurgeryHospital RudolfsstiftungViennaAustria
  3. 3.Department for SurgeryHospital HollabrunnHollabrunnAustria
  4. 4.Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal MedicineMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations