Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 1308–1316 | Cite as

Sex, Race, and the Quality of Life Factors Most Important to Patients’ Well-Being Among Those Seeking Bariatric Surgery

  • Christina C. Wee
  • Roger B. Davis
  • Dan B. Jones
  • Caroline A. Apovian
  • Sarah Chiodi
  • Karen W. Huskey
  • Mary B. Hamel
Original Contributions

Abstract

Background

Evidence suggests obesity-related social stigma and impairment in work function may be the two most detrimental quality of life (QOL) factors to overall well-being among patients seeking weight loss surgery (WLS); whether the relative importance of QOL factors varies across patient sex and race/ethnicity is unclear.

Methods

We interviewed 574 patients seeking WLS at two centers. We measured patient’s health utility (preference-based well-being measure) as determined via standard gamble scenarios assessing patients’ willingness to risk death to achieve weight loss or perfect health. Multivariable models assessed associations between patients’ utility and five weight-related QOL domains stratified by gender and race: social stigma, self-esteem, physical function, public distress (weight stigma), and work life.

Results

Depending on patients’ sex and race/ethnicity, mean utilities ranged from 0.85 to 0.91, reflecting an average willingness to assume a 9–15 % risk of death to achieve their most desired health/weight state. After adjustment, African Americans (AAs) reported higher utility than Caucasians (+0.054, p = 0.03), but utilities did not vary significantly by sex. Among Caucasian and AA men, impairment in physical functioning was the most important factor associated with diminished utility; social stigma was also a leading factor for Caucasian men. Among Caucasian women, self-esteem and work function appeared equally important. Social stigma was the leading contributor to utility among AA women; QOL factors did not appear as important among Hispanic patients.

Conclusion

AAs reported higher utilities than Caucasian patients. Individual QOL domains that drive diminished well-being varied across race/ethnicity and sex.

Keywords

Race Quality of life Health utility Bariatric surgery Obesity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (R01DK073302, PI Wee). Dr. Wee is also supported by a NIH Midcareer Mentorship Award (K24DK087932). The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. Ms. Huskey had full access to the data and takes responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the data.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

The study was funded by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (R01DK073302, PI Wee). Dr. Wee is also supported by a NIH Midcareer Mentorship Award (K24DK087932).

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Apovian reports grants from National Institutes of Health, from Myos, from Aspire Bariatrics, and from GI Dynamics; grants and personal fees from Amylin, from Sanofi-Aventis, from Orexigen, and from Takeda; personal fees from Merck, from Johnson & Johnson, from Arena, from Nutrisystem, from Zafgen, from EnteroMedics, and from NovoNordisk for work unrelated to the current project. All other authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults—the evidence report. National Institutes of Health. Obes Res. 1998;6 Suppl 2:51S-209S.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, et al. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(17):1625–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Resnick HE, Valsania P, Halter JB, et al. Differential effects of BMI on diabetes risk among black and white Americans. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(11):1828–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stevens J. Impact of age on associations between weight and mortality. Nutr Rev. 2000;58(5):129–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Puhl R, Brownell KD. Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obes Res. 2001;9(12):788–805.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    White MA, O'Neil PM, Kolotkin RL, et al. Gender, race, and obesity-related quality of life at extreme levels of obesity. Obes Res. 2004;12(6):949–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerland P, Masquelier B, Helleringer S, et al. Maternal mortality estimates. Lancet. 2014;384(9961):2211.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    The medium and the message of Ebola. Lancet. 2014;384(9955):1641.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shepard DS. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. By M.R. Gold, J.E. Siegel, L.B. Russell, and M.C. Weinstein (eds). New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 1999;2(2):91–2.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wee CC, Hamel MB, Apovian CM, et al. Expectations for weight loss and willingness to accept risk among patients seeking weight loss surgery. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(3):264–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wee CC, Davis RB, Huskey KW, et al. Quality of life among obese patients seeking weight loss surgery: the importance of obesity-related social stigma and functional status. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(2):231–8. PMCID: 3614124.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wee CC, Jones DB, Davis RB, et al. Understanding patients' value of weight loss and expectations for bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2006;16(4):496–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Kosloski KD, et al. Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity. Obes Res. 2001;9(2):102–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kolotkin RL, Head S, Hamilton M, et al. Assessing impact of weight on quality of life. Obes Res. 1995;3(1):49–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wee CC, Davis RB, Huskey KW, Jones DB, Hamel MB. Quality of life among obese patients seeking weight loss surgery: the role of obesity-related social stigma and functional status. J Gen Intern Med. 2012.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tengs TO, Wallace A. One thousand health-related quality-of-life estimates. Med Care. 2000;38(6):583–637.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Consequences of a competitive research culture. Lancet. 2014;384(9960):2084.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nguyen NT, Paya M, Stevens CM, et al. The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Ann Surg. 2004;240(4):586–93. discussion 93–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS. Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294(15):1909–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fettich KC, Chen EY. Coping with obesity stigma affects depressed mood in African-American and white candidates for bariatric surgery. Obesity. 2012;20(5):1118–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Department of MedicineBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBostonUSA
  2. 2.Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of SurgeryBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Evans Department of Medicine and Department of SurgeryBoston Medical CenterBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations