Obesity Surgery

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 163–168 | Cite as

Analysis of the Information Quality of Bariatric Surgery Smartphone Applications Using the Silberg Scale

  • Melvyn W. B. Zhang
  • Roger C. M. Ho
  • Raed Hawa
  • Sanjeev Sockalingam
Review Article

Abstract

There is a paucity of literature that has evaluated the information quality of the current bariatric and obesity applications. Our objective was to evaluate the quality of currently available smartphone applications for bariatric-patient care using the Silberg scale. The two most widely used smartphone application online stores were searched in June 2014 and a total of 39 applications were evaluated. The average Silberg score of the 39 applications was 4.0 ± 1.76. The current gaps of information quality include the lack of provision of appropriate references, full disclosure of sponsorship, and accurate disclosure whether the application has been modified in the past month.

Keywords

Bariatric surgery Smartphone Applications Information quality Silberg scale 

References

  1. 1.
    Shields M, Carroll MD, Ogden CL. Adult obesity prevalence in Canada and the United States. NCSH data brief, number 56. Hyattsville: National Centre for Health Statistics; 2011.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mitchell JE, Selzer F, Kalarchian MA, Devlin MJ, Strain GW, Elder KA,…Yanovski SZ. Psychopathology before surgery in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery-3 (LABS-3) psychosocial study. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 2012;8:533–41.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cassin SE, Sockalingam S, Wnuk S et al. Cognitive behavioural therapy for bariatric surgery patients: preliminary evidence for feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness. Cogn Behav Prac. 2013;20(4):529–43.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hamid A, Kavit A. Smartphone applications for the urology trainee. BJU Int. 2011;2011(108):1371–5.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mobile future. Social media, apps, and data growth headline 2010 mobile trends. 2010; URL: http://www.mobilefuture.org/content/pages/mobile_year_in_review_2010?/yearendvideo [accessed 2014-03-17]
  6. 6.
    Karl FBP, Heather W, Kim W. Smartphone and medical related app use among medical students and junior doctors in the United Kingdom (UK): a regional survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12:121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Katie C, Richard RWB, Bruce T, et al. Smartphone applications (apps) for the bariatric surgeon. Obes Surg. 2013;2013(23):1669–72.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daniel JS, John AJ, Noah H, et al. Obesity surgery smartphone apps: a review. Obes Surg. 2014;2014(24):32–6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Faye H, Richard RWB, Simon M. Smartphone apps to support hospital prescribing and pharmacology education: a review of current provision. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;77(1):31–8.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, et al. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287(20):2691–700.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Quality of web-based information on treatment of depression: a cross section survey. BMJ. 2000;321(7275):1511–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eunjoo J, Hyeoun-Ae P, Yul HM, et al. Analysis of the information quality of Korean obesity-management smartphone applications. Health Informatics J. 2014;20(1):23–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zermatten A, Khazaal Y, Coquard O, et al. Quality of web-based information on depression. Depress Anxiety. 2010;27(9):852–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morel V, Chatton A, Cochand S, et al. Quality of web-based information on bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2008;110(3):265–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang M, Tsang T, Cheow E, et al. Enabling psychiatrists to be mobile phone app developers: insights into app development methodologies. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2014;2(4), e53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aslani A, Pournik O, Abu-Hanna A, et al. Website evaluation tools: a case study in reproductive health information. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:895–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melvyn W. B. Zhang
    • 1
  • Roger C. M. Ho
    • 2
  • Raed Hawa
    • 3
  • Sanjeev Sockalingam
    • 3
  1. 1.National Addictions Management ServiceInstitute of Mental HealthSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Level 9, Department of Psychological MedicineYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.University Health Network, Centre for Mental Health, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations