Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 571–574 | Cite as

Systematic Review of Definitions of Failure in Revisional Bariatric Surgery

  • Jake P. Mann
  • Adam D. Jakes
  • Jeremy D. Hayden
  • Julian H. Barth
Brief Communication

Abstract

Background

There are no agreed definitions as to what constitutes a ‘failure’ of the primary bariatric procedure in relation to weight loss.

Methods

The MEDLINE database for primary research articles was searched using obesity [title] or bariatric [title] and revision [title] or revisional [title].

Results

The MEDLINE search retrieved 174 studies. After duplicates and exclusions were removed, 60 articles underwent analysis. Fifty-one studies included inadequate weight loss or weight regain as an indication for revision: 31/51 (61 %) gave no definition of failure, 7/20 quoted <50 % of excess weight loss at 18 months and 6/20 used <25 % excess weight loss.

Conclusions

The majority of published studies do not define failure of bariatric surgery, and <50 % excess weight loss at 18 months was the most frequent definition identified.

Keywords

Bariatric surgery Obesity Revisional surgery Failure 

Notes

Statement of Informed Consent

Does not apply.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Gloy VL, Briel M, Bhatt DL, et al. Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2013;347:f5934. Epub 2013/10/24.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elder KA, Wolfe BM. Bariatric surgery: a review of procedures and outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(6):2253–71. Epub 2007/05/15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baltasar A, Perez N, Serra C, et al. Weight loss reporting: predicted body mass index after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2011;21:367–72. Epub 2010/08/04.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chang SH, Stoll CR, Song J, et al. The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003–2012. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(3):275–87. Epub 2013/12/20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rogers CA, Welbourn R, Byrne J, et al. The By-Band study: gastric bypass or adjustable gastric band surgery to treat morbid obesity: study protocol for a multi-centre randomized controlled trial with an internal pilot phase. Trials 2014;15:53 Epub 2014/02/11Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    NIH conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(12):956–61. Epub 1991/12/15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    CONSORT statement and checklist. http://www.consort-statement.org/ Accessed 7/9/2014
  8. 8.
    Reinhold RB. Critical analysis of long term weight loss following gastric bypass. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982;155(3):385–94. Epub 1982/09/01.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Courcoulas AP, Christian NJ, Belle SH, et al. Weight change and health outcomes at 3 years after bariatric surgery among individuals with severe obesity. JAMA: J Am Med Assoc. 2013;310(22):2416–25. Epub 2013/11/06.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dixon JB, McPhail T, O’Brien PE. Minimal reporting requirements for weight loss: current methods not ideal. Obes Surg. 2005;15(7):1034–9. Epub 2005/08/18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jake P. Mann
    • 1
    • 2
  • Adam D. Jakes
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jeremy D. Hayden
    • 2
  • Julian H. Barth
    • 1
  1. 1.Medical Obesity ClinicLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustLeedsUK
  2. 2.Department of Upper GI & Bariatric SurgeryLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations