Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 24, Issue 12, pp 2109–2116 | Cite as

Sociodemographic Differences and Time Trends of Bariatric Surgery in Sweden 1990–2010

  • Ensieh Memarian
  • Susanna Calling
  • Kristina Sundquist
  • Jan Sundquist
  • Xinjun Li
Original Contributions

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present study was to examine demographic and socioeconomic differences and time trends of bariatric surgery in Sweden during 1990–2010.

Methods

An open cohort of all individuals aged 20–64 years was followed between 1990 and 2010. Socioeconomic differences were examined during two periods: 1990–2005 and 2006–2010 using cumulative rates in a closed cohort. Hazard ratios (HRs) of bariatric surgery were calculated in these two periods using Cox regression models.

Results

A majority of the 22,198 individuals that underwent bariatric surgery were women (76.3 %). Women were more likely to undergo surgery in younger ages (30–39 years), while men were more likely to undergo surgery around 10 years later (40–49 years). The number of surgeries increased substantially during the second period. During the whole period, the dominating surgical method was gastric bypass contributing to 69.4 % of the procedures. HRs for bariatric surgery were highest for individuals with intermediate educational level and intermediate-low income in both periods. For married/cohabiting and/or employed individuals, the HRs were highest during the first period whereas an opposite pattern was seen in the second period.

Conclusions

Individuals in the lowest socioeconomic groups undergo bariatric surgery less often than those with intermediate income and educational level, although previous research has shown that those with low socioeconomic status have the highest rates of morbid obesity. The failure to identify eligible individuals for surgery may result in negative effects on those individuals with the largest need for weight loss.

Keywords

Obesity Bariatric surgery Socioeconomic differences Time trends 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants to Dr Kristina Sundquist and Dr Jan Sundquist from the Swedish Research Council as well as ALF funding from Region Skåne awarded to Kristina Sundquist and Jan Sundquist.

Conflict of Interest

There are no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, et al. National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 million participants. Lancet. 2011;377:557–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Welfare SNBoHa. National Public Health Report 2009 (Folkhälsorapport 2009). Stockholm: Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare; 2009.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buchwald H, Panel CC. Consensus conference statement bariatric surgery for morbid obesity: health implications for patients, health professionals, and third-party payers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1:371–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. World Health Organization; 2000. pp. 252, http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/obesity/WHO_TRS_894/en/index.html.
  5. 5.
    Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National institute of Health; 1998.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Economics OoH. Shedding the pounds. Obesity management, NICE guidance and bariatric surgery in England. 2010. 2012. Accessed at www.ohe.org.
  7. 7.
    Lau DC, Douketis JD, Morrison KM, et al. 2006 Canadian clinical practice guidelines on the management and prevention of obesity in adults and children [summary]. CMAJ. 2007;176:S1–13.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Atkinson RL, Dietz WH, Foreyt JP, et al. Very low-calorie diets. National Task Force on the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity, National Institutes of Health. JAMA 1993;270:967–74.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Safer DJ. Diet, behavior modification, and exercise: a review of obesity treatments from a long-term perspective. South Med J. 1991;84:1470–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weintraub M, Sundaresan PR, Schuster B, et al. Long-term weight control study. IV (weeks 156 to 190). The second double-blind phase. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1992;51:608–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sjöström L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2683–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:741–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Livingston EH, Fink AS. Quality of life: cost and future of bariatric surgery. Arch Surg. 2003;138:383–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cremieux PY, Buchwald H, Shikora SA, et al. A study on the economic impact of bariatric surgery. Am J Manag Care. 2008;14:589–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martin M, Beekley A, Kjorstad R, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in eligibility and access to bariatric surgery: a national population-based analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:8–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leffler E, Gustavsson S, Karlson BM. Time trends in obesity surgery 1987 through 1996 in Sweden—a population-based study. Obes Surg. 2000;10:543–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    National Board of Health and Welfare. Validity of the diagnoses from the Swedish in-care Register 1987 and 1995. (In Swedish: Värdering av diagnoskvaliteten för akut hjärtinfarkt i patientregistret 1987 och 1995): Epidemiologiskt Centrum, Socialstyrelsen; 2000.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ludvigsson JF, Andersson E, Ekbom A, et al. External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:450.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    International Classification of Diseases (ICD). World Health Organization: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/.
  21. 21.
    Calling S, Li X, Sundquist J, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities and infant mortality of 46,470 preterm infants born in Sweden between 1992 and 2006. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011;25:357–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Age standardization of rates: a new WHO standard: World Health Organization. 2001. www.who.int/healthinfo/paper31.pdf
  23. 23.
    SAS Institute Inc. SAS 9.3. NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.; 2011.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yearly report 2011. (Årsrapport 2011) Scandinavian obesity surgery registry (SOREG). 2011. http://www.ucr.uu.se/soreg/index.php/dokument/cat_view/58-dokument/57-arsrappoerter.
  25. 25.
    Halloran K, Padwal RS, Johnson-Stoklossa C, et al. Income status and approval for bariatric surgery in a publicly funded regional obesity program. Obes Surg. 2011;21:373–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kuntz B, Lampert T. Socioeconomic factors and obesity. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107:517–22.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sundquist J, Johansson SE, Sundquist K. Levelling off of prevalence of obesity in the adult population of Sweden between 2000/01 and 2004/05. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:119.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shahar D, Shai I, Vardi H, et al. Diet and eating habits in high and low socioeconomic groups. Nutrition. 2005;21:559–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Livingston EH, Ko CY. Socioeconomic characteristics of the population eligible for obesity surgery. Surgery. 2004;135:288–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sobal J, Stunkard AJ. Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychol Bull. 1989;105:260–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sjöberg. Have lifestyles improved? Statistics Sweden’s survey of living conditions (Har levnadsvanorna förbättrats? SCB undersökning om levnadsförhållanden) (ULF). Stat Swed J (Statistiska Centralbyråns tidskrift) 2000;2.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS. Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294:1909–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Westling A, Bjurling K, Ohrvall M, et al. Silicone-adjustable gastric banding: disappointing results. Obes Surg. 1998;8:467–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Santry HP, Lauderdale DS, Cagney KA, et al. Predictors of patient selection in bariatric surgery. Ann Surg. 2007;245:59–67.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kuskowska-Wolk A, Rössner S. Inter-relationships between socio-demographic factors and body mass index in a representative Swedish adult population. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1990;10 Suppl 1:S271–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ensieh Memarian
    • 1
  • Susanna Calling
    • 1
  • Kristina Sundquist
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jan Sundquist
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xinjun Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Primary Health Care ResearchLund University/Region Skåne, Skåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
  2. 2.Stanford Prevention Research CenterStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations