Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Bariatric Surgery with Continuous Infusion of Cefazolin: Determination of Concentration in Adipose Tissue
- 428 Downloads
- 7 Citations
Abstract
Background
The aim of this study was to evaluate the concentration of cefazolin in adipose tissue of patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
Methods
Eighteen patients undergoing bariatric surgery were evaluated during the period from October 2011 to May 2012. All patients had a dosage schedule of antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin administered as follows: first, 2 g in anesthetic induction, followed by continuous infusion of 1 g diluted in 250 ml of saline solution. Adipose samples, collected soon after the incision (initial) and before the skin synthesis (final), were analyzed using reverse phase high-pressure liquid chromatography. The level of significance adopted was 5 %.
Results
The cefazolin concentration in the adipose tissue samples at the beginning of surgery was an average of 6.66 ± 2.56 ug/ml. The mean concentration before the skin synthesis was 7.93 ± 2.54 ug/ml. Patients with BMI < 40 kg/m2 had higher initial and final sample concentrations of cefazolin than patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2. There was no surgical site infection (SSI) in any of the patients.
Conclusions
In bariatric surgeries, addition of a 1 g increase of cefazolin, administered through continuous intravenous infusion, to the currently recommended dose of 2 g administered in anesthetic induction provided a concentration in the adipose tissue above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the main causal agents of SSI. An inverse correlation between BMI and concentration of cefazolin in adipose tissue was observed.
Keywords
Obesity Bariatric surgery Cefazolin Antimicrobial prophylaxisNotes
Conflict of Interests
The antibiotic manufacturer did not participate in this study, and there were no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.World Health Organization. Obesity, situations and trends. http://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/obesity_text/en/index.html. Accessed 25 July 2012.
- 2.Christou NV, Jarand J, Sylvestre JL, et al. Analysis of the incidence and risk factors for wound infections in open bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2004;14:16–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Alexander JW, Rahn R. Prevention of deep wound infection in morbidly obese patients by infusion of an antibiotic into the subcutaneous space at the time of wound closure. Obes Surg. 2004;14:970–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Freeman JT, Anderson DJ, Sexton DJ. Surgical site infections following bariatric surgery in community hospitals: a weight concern? Obes Surg. 2011;21(7):836–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg. 2001;234(3):279–89.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Chopra T, Zhao JJ, Alangaden G, et al. Preventing surgical site infections after bariatric surgery: value of perioperative antibiotic regimens. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcome Res. 2010;10(3):317–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Ho VP, Nicolau DP, Dakin GF, et al. Cefazolin dosing for surgical prophylaxis in morbidly obese patients. Surg Infect. 2012;13(1):33–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Edmiston Jr CE, Krepel C, Kelly H, et al. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in the gastric bypass patient: do we achieve therapeutic levels? Surgery. 2004;136:738–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Liu P, Müller M, Derendorf H. Rational dosing of antibiotics: the use of plasma concentrations versus tissue concentration. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2002;19:285–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Pai MP, Bearden DT. Antimicrobial dosing considerations in obese adult patients. Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27:1081–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Chen M, Nafziger AN, Drusano GL, et al. Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic target attainment of ertapenem in normal-weight, obese, and extremely obese adults. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(4):1222–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Pai MP, Noremberg JP, Anderson T, et al. Influence of morbid obesity on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of daptomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(8):2741–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Barbour A, Schmidt S, Rout WR, et al. Soft tissue penetration of cefuroxime determined by clinical microdialysis in morbidly obese patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;34:231–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Kees MG, Weber S, Kees F, et al. Pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin in plasma and tissue of morbidly obese patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:2330–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Van Kralingen S, Taks M, Diepstraten J, et al. Pharmacokinetics and protein binding of cefazolin in morbidly obese patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;67(10):985–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Cook AM, Martin C, Adams VR, et al. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous levofloxacin administered at 750 milligrams in obese adults. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(7):3240–3.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Pevzner L, Swank M, Krepel C, et al. Effects of maternal obesity on tissue concentrations of prophylactic cefazolin during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(4):877–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Rich BS, Keel R, Ho VP, et al. Cefepime dosing in the morbidly obese patient population. Obes Surg. 2012;22:465–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Anaya DA, Dellinger EP. The obese surgical patient: a susceptible host for infection. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2006;7:473–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Ferraz AAB, Leão CS, Campos JM, et al. Profilaxia antimicrobiana na cirurgia bariátrica. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2007;34(2):73–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Signs SA, File TM, Tan JS. High-pressure liquid chromatographic method for analysis of cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984;26(5):652–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Waltrip T, Lewis R, Young V, et al. A pilot study to determine the feasibility of continuous cefazolin infusion. Surg Infect. 2002;3(1):5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Koopman E, Nix DE, Erstad BL, et al. End-of-procedure cefazolin concentrations after administration for prevention of surgical-site infection. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64:1927–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: twentieth informational supplement. M100-S20. Vol 30, No. 1. Wayne (PA): Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute; 2010.Google Scholar
- 25.http://www.anvisa.gov.br/servicosaude/manuais/clsi.asp. Accessed 23 September 2012.
- 26.DiPiro JT, Edmiston CE, Bohnen JMA. Pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial therapy in surgery. Arch Surg. 1996;171:616–22.Google Scholar
- 27.Roberts JA, Paratz JD, Paratz E, et al. Continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics in severe infections: a review of its role. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007;30:11–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Roberts JA, Lipman J. Tissue distribution of beta-lactam antibiotics: continuous versus bolus dosing. J Pharm Pract Res. 2009;39:219–22.Google Scholar
- 29.Toma O, Suntrup P, Stefanescu A, et al. Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of cefoxitin in obesity: implications for risk of surgical site infection. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:730–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar