Obesity Surgery

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 841–846

Greater Weight Loss with the Omega Loop Bypass Compared to the Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Comparative Study

  • E. Disse
  • A. Pasquer
  • P. Espalieu
  • G. Poncet
  • C. Gouillat
  • M. Robert
Original Contributions

Abstract

Background

Despite similar initial results on weight loss and metabolic control, with a better feasibility than the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), the omega loop bypass (OLB) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of the laparoscopic OLB versus the RYGBP in terms of weight loss, metabolic control, and safety.

Methods

Two groups of consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery were selected: 20 OLB patients and 61 RYGBP patients. Patients were matched for age, gender, and initial body mass index (BMI). Data concerning weight loss, metabolic outcomes, and complications were collected prospectively.

Results

Mean duration of the surgical procedure was shorter in the OLB group (105 vs 152 min in the RYGBP group; p < 0.001). Mean excess BMI loss percent (EBL%) at 6 months and at 1 year was greater in the OLB group (76.3 vs 60.0 %, p = 0.001, and 89.0 vs 71.0 %, p = 0.002, respectively). After adjustment for age, sex, initial BMI, and history of previous bariatric surgery, the OLB procedure was still associated with a significantly greater 1-year EBL%. Diabetes improvement at 6 months was similar between both groups. The early and late complication rates were not statistically different. There were three anastomotic ulcers in the OLB group, in smokers, over 60 years old, who were not taking proton pump inhibitor medication.

Conclusions

In this short-term study, we observed a greater weight loss with OLB and similar efficiency on metabolic control compared to RYGBP. Long-term evaluation is necessary to confirm these outcomes.

Keywords

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Omega loop bypass Weight loss Morbid obesity Bariatric surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2683–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maggard MA, Shugarman LR, Suttorp M, et al. Meta-analysis: surgical treatment of obesity. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:547–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Griffen Jr WO, Young VL, Stevenson CC. A prospective comparison of gastric and jejunoileal bypass procedures for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 1977;186:500–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS. Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294:1909–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    DeMaria EJ, Pate V, Warthen M, et al. Baseline data from American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery-designated Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence using the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:347–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saber AA, Elgamal MH, McLeod MK. Bariatric surgery: the past, present, and future. Obes Surg. 2008;18:121–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242:20–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reddy RM, Riker A, Marra D, et al. Open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the morbidly obese in the era of laparoscopy. Am J Surg. 2002;184:611–5. discussion 5-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Christou N, Efthimiou E. Five-year outcomes of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a comprehensive bariatric surgery program in Canada. Can J Surg. 2009;52:E249–58.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg. 2001;11:276–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rutledge R, Walsh TR. Continued excellent results with the mini-gastric bypass: six-year study in 2,410 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1304–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peraglie C. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB) in the super-super obese: outcomes in 16 patients. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1126–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1827–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, et al. One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: short- and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2012;22:697–703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fisher BL, Buchwald H, Clark W, et al. Mini-gastric bypass controversy. Obes Surg. 2001;11:773–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lonroth H, Dalenback J, Haglind E, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass. Another option in bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 1996;10:636–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    American Diabetes Association. Executive summary: standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(1):S4–10.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zingg U, McQuinn A, DiValentino D, et al. Revisional vs. primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass—a case-matched analysis: less weight loss in revisions. Obes Surg. 2010;20:1627–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ochner CN, Teixeira J, Geary N, et al. Greater short-term weight loss in women 20-45 versus 55-65 years of age following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2013;23:1650–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Contreras JE, Santander C, Court I, et al. Correlation between age and weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2013;23:1286–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122:248–56. e5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hamdan K, Somers S, Chand M. Management of late postoperative complications of bariatric surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1345–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dapri G, Cadiere GB, Himpens J. Superobese and super-superobese patients: 2-step laparoscopic duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:703–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gumbs AA, Duffy AJ, Bell RL. Incidence and management of marginal ulceration after laparoscopic Roux-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2:460–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bege T, Berdah SV, Moutardier V, et al. [Risks related to tobacco use in general and intestinal surgery]. J Chir (Paris). 2009;146:532–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Delgado-Rodriguez M, Medina-Cuadros M, Martinez-Gallego G, et al. A prospective study of tobacco smoking as a predictor of complications in general surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003;24:37–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Disse
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Pasquer
    • 3
  • P. Espalieu
    • 3
    • 4
  • G. Poncet
    • 3
  • C. Gouillat
    • 3
  • M. Robert
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Nutrition, Specialized and Integrated Center for Obesity Management, Hospices Civils de LyonCentre Hospitalier Lyon SudPierre BéniteFrance
  2. 2.Centre Européen Nutrition et Santé (CENS), Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine Rhône-Alpes, Unité INSERM 1060, Laboratoire CarMeNUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1Pierre BéniteFrance
  3. 3.Department of Digestive Surgery, Specialized and Integrated Center for Obesity Management, Hospices Civils de LyonHôpital Edouard HerriotLyonFrance
  4. 4.Centre Hospitalier Privé de la Loire (CHPL)Saint EtienneFrance
  5. 5.Department of Digestive Surgery, Hospices Civils de LyonHôpital Edouard HerriotLyonFrance
  6. 6.Department of Digestive Surgery, Specialized and Integrated Center for Obesity Management, Hospices Civils de LyonUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1LyonFrance

Personalised recommendations