Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 460–466 | Cite as

Gastric Bypass is a Cost-Saving Procedure: Results from a Comprehensive Markov Model

  • Gil R. Faria
  • John R. Preto
  • José Costa-Maia
Economic Aspects

Abstract

Background

Obesity is a growing public health problem in industrialized countries and is directly and indirectly responsible for almost 10 % of all health expenditures. Bariatric surgery is the best available treatment, however, associated with important economical expenditures. So, cost-effectiveness analysis of the available surgical options is paramount.

Methods

We developed a Markov model for three different strategies: best medical management, gastric band, and gastric bypass. The Markov model was constructed to allow for the evaluation of the impact of several obesity-related comorbidities. The results were derived for a representative population of morbidly obese patients, and subgroup analyses were performed for patients without comorbidities, patients with diabetes mellitus, different age, and body mass index (BMI) groups. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed accounting for lifetime costs and from a societal perspective.

Results

Gastric bypass is a dominant strategy, rendering a significant decrease in lifetime costs and increase in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Comparing with the best medical management, in the global population of patients with a BMI of >35 kg/m2, gastric bypass renders 1.9 extra QALYs and saves on average 13,244€ per patient. Younger patients, patients with a BMI between 40 and 50 kg/m2, and patients without obesity-related diseases are the ones with a bigger benefit in terms of cost effectiveness.

Conclusions

Gastric bypass surgery increases quality-adjusted survival and saves resources to health systems. As such, it can be an important process to control the ever-increasing health expenditure.

Keywords

Obesity surgery Cost-effectiveness Markov model Gastric bypass 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Salem L, Jensen CC, Flum DR. Are bariatric surgical outcomes worth their cost? A systematic review. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200(2):270–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martin LF, Tan TL, Horn JR, et al. Comparison of the costs associated with medical and surgical treatment of obesity. Surgery. 1995;118(4):599–606. discussion606–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):741–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnson RJ, Johnson BL, Blackhurst DW, et al. Bariatric surgery is associated with a reduced risk of mortality in morbidly obese patients with a history of major cardiovascular events. Am Surg. 2012;78(6):685–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pontiroli AE, Morabito A. Long-term prevention of mortality in morbid obesity through bariatric surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials performed with gastric banding and gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2011;253(3):484–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramanan B, Gupta PK, Gupta H, et al. Development and validation of a bariatric surgery mortality risk calculator. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(6):892–900.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    SAGES Guidelines Committee. SAGES guideline for clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(3):387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Terranova L, Busetto L, Vestri A, et al. Bariatric surgery: cost-effectiveness and budget impact. Obes Surg. 2012;22(4):646–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mäklin S, Malmivaara A, Linna M, et al. Cost-utility of bariatric surgery for morbid obesity in Finland. Br J Surg. 2011;98(10):1422–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chang S-H, Stoll CRT, Colditz GA. Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery: should it be universally available? Maturitas. 2011;69(3):230–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Welbourn R, Pournaras D. Bariatric surgery: a cost-effective intervention for morbid obesity; functional and nutritional outcomes. Proc Nutr Soc. 2010;69(4):528–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Campbell J, McGarry LA, Shikora SA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic gastric banding and bypass for morbid obesity. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(7):e174–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anselmino M, Bammer T, Fernández Cebrián JM, et al. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of obesity surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes in three European countries. Obes Surg. 2009;19(11):1542–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Salem L, Devlin A, Sullivan SD, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic gastric bypass, adjustable gastric banding, and nonoperative weight loss interventions. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(1):26–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sonnenberg FA, Beck JR. Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Making. 1993;13(4):322–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hunink MGM. Decision making in health and medicine. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brethauer SA, Chand B, Schauer PR. Risks and benefits of bariatric surgery: current evidence. Cleve Clin J Med. 2006;73(11):993–1007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keating CL, Dixon JB, Moodie ML, et al. Cost-effectiveness of surgically induced weight loss for the management of type 2 diabetes: modeled lifetime analysis. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(4):567–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wadden TA, Sternberg JA, Letizia KA, et al. Treatment of obesity by very low calorie diet, behavior therapy, and their combination: a five-year perspective. Int J Obes. 1989;2(13):39–46.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA. 2003;289(1):76–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, et al. Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg. 2004;240(3):416–23. discussion423–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McEwen LN, Coelho RB, Baumann LM, et al. The cost, quality of life impact, and cost-utility of bariatric surgery in a managed care population. Obes Surg. 2010;20(7):919–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Arias E. United States life tables, 2006. National vital statistics reports: from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Flum DR, Dellinger EP. Impact of gastric bypass operation on survival: a population-based analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199(4):543–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brancati FL, Whelton PK, Randall BL, et al. Risk of end-stage renal disease in diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study of men screened for MRFIT. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. JAMA. 1997;278(23):2069–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pi-Sunyer FX. Type 2 diabetes outcomes. Obes Res. 2002;10 Suppl 1:22S–6S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    United States Environmental Protection Agency. Cardiovascular disease prevalence and mortality. Available from: http://cfpub.epa.gov/eroe/index.cfm?fuseaction=detail.viewInd&lv=list.listByAlpha&r=235292&subtop=381. Accessed 9 Jun 2012.
  28. 28.
    Sjöström L, Peltonen M, Jacobson P, et al. Bariatric surgery and long-term cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2012;307(1):56–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Davis WA, Knuiman MW, Hendrie D, et al. The obesity-driven rising costs of type 2 diabetes in Australia: projections from the fremantle diabetes study. Intern Med J. 2006;36(3):155–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Cost justification for diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Position statement of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Sleep. 2000;23(8):1017–8.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, Campion ME, et al. Direct medical costs unique to people with arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1997;24(4):719–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Potetz L. Cancer and medicare: a chartbook. Washington, DC: American Cancer Society; 2009.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    National Institutes of Health. US Renal Data System (USRDS) annual data report: atlas of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in the United States. National Institutes of Health. http://www.usrds.org/adr.htm. 2010.
  34. 34.
    Craig BM, Tseng DS. Cost-effectiveness of gastric bypass for severe obesity. Am J Med. 2002;113(6):491–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    De Smedt D, De Cocker K, Annemans L, et al. A cost-effectiveness study of the community-based intervention ’10,000 steps Ghent’. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15(3):442–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pollock RF, Valentine WJ, Pilgaard T, et al. The cost effectiveness of rapid-acting insulin aspart compared with human insulin in type 2 diabetes patients: an analysis from the Japanese third-party payer perspective. J Med Econ. 2011;14(1):36–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Padwal RS, Majumdar SR, Klarenbach S, et al. The Alberta population-based prospective evaluation of the quality of life outcomes and economic impact of bariatric surgery (APPLES) study: background, design and rationale. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ackroyd R, Mouiel J, Chevallier J-M, et al. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of obesity surgery in patients with type-2 diabetes in three European countries. Obes Surg. 2006;16(11):1488–503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chevallier J-M, Daoud F, Szwarcensztein K, et al. Medicoeconomic evaluation of the treatment of morbid obesity by Swedish adjustable gastric banding (SAGB). Ann Chir. 2006;131(1):12–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Reis CEG, Alvarez-Leite JI, Bressan J, et al. Role of bariatric-metabolic surgery in the treatment of obese type 2 diabetes with body mass index. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14(4):365–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Deitel M. Bariatric surgery is a cost-saving for the healthcare system. Obes Surg. 2005;15(3):301–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gil R. Faria
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • John R. Preto
    • 1
    • 2
  • José Costa-Maia
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Department of SurgerySão João Medical CenterPortoPortugal
  3. 3.Al. Prof. Hernani MonteiroHSJ–Cirurgia Geral Piso 5PortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations