Obesity Surgery

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 597–601

Lean and Fat Mass Loss in Obese Patients Before and After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A New Application for Ultrasound Technique

  • A. Z. Pereira
  • J. S. Marchini
  • G. Carneiro
  • C. H. Arasaki
  • M. T. Zanella
Clinical Research

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the thickness of the femoral quadriceps and biceps brachii and brachialis muscles bilaterally and the adjacent subcutaneous fat in patients undergoing gastric bypass Roux-en-Y before and after surgery, using ultrasound as the diagnostic method of choice.

Methods

We studied 12 patients undergoing this surgical method preoperatively and during the first, third, and sixth postoperative months. During these periods, patients were evaluated by ultrasound to determine the thickness of subcutaneous adipose tissue and muscle of the upper and lower limbs.

Results

Postoperatively, these patients showed a reduction in the thickness of the upper and lower extremities muscle and adipose tissue as compared to their preoperative values. There was a significant difference in the loss of muscle thickness in all postoperative months and in the thickness of fatty tissue in the sixth month after surgery, compared to the preoperative muscle and fatty tissue thickness.

Conclusions

Ultrasound can be considered as the diagnostic method of choice when assessment of the fat and lean body mass is required in morbidly obese patients before and after bariatric surgery.

Keywords

Muscle ultrasound Fat mass Obesity Ultrasound Lean mass Gastroplasty Bariatric surgery Gastric bypass Roux-en-Y 

References

  1. 1.
    Buckley O, Ward E, Ryan A, et al. European obesity and the radiology department. What can we do to help? Eur Radiol. 2009;19:298–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sabir N, Pakdemirli E, Kazil S, et al. Sonographic assessment of changes in thickness of different abdominal fat layers in response to diet in obese women. J Clin Ultrasound. 2002;42(1):26–30.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pontiroli AE, Pizzocri P, Ferla G, et al. Ultrasound measurement of visceral and subcutaneous fat in morbidly obese patients before and after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: comparison with computerized tomography and with anthropometric measurements. Obes Surg. 2002;12:648–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stefan N, Kantartzis K, Thamer C, et al. Identification and characterization of metabolically benign obesity in humans. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(15):1609–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Serap S, Erçin O, Nuran S, et al. Body fat distribution in childhood obesity: association with metabolic risk factors. Indian Ped 2008; 457(45).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ribeiro-Filho FF, Faria NA, Ferreira SRG, et al. Ultrasonography for the evaluation of visceral fat and cardiovascular risk. Hypertension. 2001;38(2):713–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Donadelli S, Salgado Jr W, Nonino CB, et al. Change in predicted 10-year cardiovascular risk following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: who benefits? Obes Surg. 2011;21:569–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carey DG, Pilego GJ, Raymond RL, et al. Body composition and metabolic changes following bariatric surgery: effects on fat mass, lean mass and basal metabolic rate. Obes Surg. 2006;16:469–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zalesin KC, Franklin BA, Lillystone MA, et al. Differential loss of fat and lean mass in the morbidly obese after bariatric surgery. Metabol Synd Relat Dis. 2010;8(1):15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pineau JC, Filliard JR, Bocquet M, et al. Ultrasound techniques applied to body fat measurement in male and female athletes. J Athl Train. 2009;44(2):142–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Plank LD. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005;8:305–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pineau JC, Lalys L, Dabbas-Tyan M, et al. Ultrasound measurement of total body fat in obese adolescents. Ann Nutr Metab. 2010;56:36–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Genton L, Hans D, Kyle U G et al. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition: differences between devices and comparison with reference methods. Nutrition 2002; 18(1).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gray DS, Bray GA, Kirk S, et al. Skinfold thickness measurements in obese subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;51:571–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Selkow NM, Pietrosimone BG, Saliba SA. Subcutaneous thigh fat assessment: a comparison of skinfold calipers and ultrasound imaging. J Athl Train. 2011;46(1):50–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kuczmarski RJ, Faneii MT, Koch GG. Ultrasonic assessment of body composition in obese adults: overcoming the limitations of the skinfold. Am J Clin Nutr. 1987;45:717–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pineau JC, Guihard-Costa AM, Bocquet M. Validation of ultrasound techniques applied to body fat measurement a comparison between ultrasound techniques, air displacement plethysmography and bioelectrical impedance vs. dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Ann Nutr Metab. 2007;51:421–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Port AM, Apovian C. Metabolic support of the obese intensive care unit patient: a current perspective. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2010;13(2):184–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dickerson RN. Hypocaloric feeding of obese patients in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005;8(2):189–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thornell LE. Sarcopenic obesity: satellite cells in the aging muscle. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2011;14:22–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Trip J, Pillen S, Drost G, et al. Muscle ultrasound measurements and functional muscle parameters in non-dystrophic myotonias suggest structural muscle changes. Neuromuscul Disord. 2009;19:462–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maurits N, Alexander E, Beenaker C, et al. Muscle ultrasound in children: normal values and application to neuromuscular disorders. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004;30(8):1017–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    American Diabetes Association (ADA). Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:S62–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mechanick JI, Kushner RF, Spitz AF, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the Perioperative Nutritional, Metabolic, and Nonsurgical Support of the Bariatric Surgery. Obesity. 2009;17(1):S1–S70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wadstrom C, Backman L, Forsberg AM, et al. Body composition and muscle constituents during weight loss: studies in obese patients following gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 2000;10:203–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rubenoff R, Castaneda C. Sarcopenia—understanding the dynamics of aging muscle. JAMA. 2011;286(10):1230–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Savastano S, Di Somma C, Colao A, et al. Growth hormone treatment prevents loss of lean mass after bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients: results of a pilot, open, prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(3):817–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stevens-Simon C, Thureen P, Stamm E, et al. Skinfold caliper and ultrasound assessments of change in the distribution of subcutaneous fat during adolescent pregnancy. Int J Obes. 2001;25:1340–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Radominski R, Verozzo DP, Halpern A, et al. O Uso da ultra-sonografia na avaliação da distribuição de gordura abdominal. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2000;44(1):5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Z. Pereira
    • 1
  • J. S. Marchini
    • 2
  • G. Carneiro
    • 1
  • C. H. Arasaki
    • 3
  • M. T. Zanella
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medicine, Division of EndocrinologyUNIFESPSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical NutritionUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Surgery, Division of Gastroenterological SurgeryUNIFESPSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations