Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 157–160 | Cite as

Failed Restrictive Surgery: Is Sleeve Gastrectomy a Good Revisional Procedure?

  • Moises Jacobs
  • Eddie Gomez
  • Roderick Romero
  • Irving Jorge
  • Roberto Fogel
  • Carlos Celaya
Clinical Report

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of converting failed restrictive procedures such as laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), non-adjustable gastric banding (NAGB), and vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). A prospective database was maintained of 32 patients who failed restrictive procedures. Twenty-six patients failed LAGB, three patients failed NAGB, one of which was performed open, and three patients failed VBG. These patients were converted to LSG between January 2006 and May 2010. Post-conversion outcomes, BMI, and excess weight loss (EWL) were recorded. Four patients were excluded from the weight loss statistical data secondary to short follow-up (less than 6 months since conversion); however, these patients were included in the overall number of cases and in the discussion of complications. Causes of failed restrictive procedures in our series include inadequate weight loss, 15 (47%); weight gain, six (19%); slippage, five (16%); esophageal dilatation, one (3%); unhappy with device, one (3%); tear of silastic ring, one (3%); infection, one (3%), gastrogastric fistula with VBG and weight gain, one (3%); and intractable nausea and vomiting, one (3%). The average hospital stay was 1.5 days (range, 1–3). The average length of follow-up was 26 months. The mean pre-conversion BMI was 42.69, post-conversion to SG mean BMI was 33.3, mean EWL pre-conversion was 10%, and post-conversion mean EWL was 60%. There was no mortality, no conversion to open, and there was one complication, a contained leak resolved by antibiotic treatment. Conversion to LSG from a prior restrictive procedure may be a feasible and acceptable alternative for patients. Average EWL was 60% at an average of 26 months.

Keywords

Sleeve Gastrectomy Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding Excess Weight Loss Vertical Band Gastroplasty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Brethauer S, Hammel J, Schauer P. Systematic review of sleeve gastrectomy as staging and primary bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(4):469–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Suter M, Calmes JM, Paroz A, et al. A 10-year experience with laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity: high long-term complication and failure rates. Obes Surg. 2006;16(7):829–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tucker O, Sucandy I, Szomstein S, et al. Revisional surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(6):740–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Acholonu E, McBean E, Court I, et al. Safety and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional approach for failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2009;19(12):1612–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bueter M, Thalhemer A, Wierlemann A, et al. Reoperations after gastric banding: replacement or alternative procedures? Surg Endosc. 2009;23(2):334–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dapri G, Cadiere G, Himpens J. Feasibility and technique of laparoscopic conversion of adjustable gastric banding to sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(1):72–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elazary R, Hazzan D, Appelbaum L, et al. Feasibility of sleeve gastrectomy as a revision operation for failed silastic ring vertical gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 2009;19(5):645–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frezza E, Jaramillo E, Calleja, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy after gastric banding removal: a feasibility study. Surg Innov. 2009;16(1):68–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dolan K, Fielding G. Biliopancreatic diversion following failure of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(1):60–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karamanakos S, Vagenas K, Kalfarentzos F, et al. Weight loss, appetite suppression, and changes in fasting and postprandial ghrelin and peptide-YY levels after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective, double blind study. Ann Surg. 2008;247(3):408–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Melissas J, Koukouraki S, Askoxylakis I, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy—a restrictive procedure? Obes Surg. 2007;17(1):57–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Melissas J, Daskalakas M, Koukouraki S, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy—a “food limiting” operation. Obes Surg. 2008;18(10):1251–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moises Jacobs
    • 1
  • Eddie Gomez
    • 1
  • Roderick Romero
    • 1
  • Irving Jorge
    • 1
  • Roberto Fogel
    • 1
  • Carlos Celaya
    • 1
  1. 1.Gastric Sleeve CenterJackson South Community HospitalMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations